Osobní finanční poradci

Mírné riziko
43%
Kam byste chtěli jít dál?
Sdílejte své výsledky s přáteli a rodinou.
Nebo prozkoumejte tuto profesi podrobněji...
RIZIKO AUTOMATIZACE
VYPOČTENÝ
43%
(Mírné riziko)
HLASOVÁNÍ
43%
(Mírné riziko)
Average: 43%
POPTÁVKA PO PRACI
RŮST
17,1%
do roku 2033
MZDY
99 580 $
nebo 47,87 $ za hodinu
Objem
272 190
k datu 2023
SHRNUTÍ
SKÓRE PRÁCE
7,0/10

Lidé také zobrazili

Vypočítané riziko automatizace

43% (Mírné riziko)

Střední riziko (41-60%): Profese se středním rizikem automatizace obvykle zahrnují rutinní úkoly, ale stále vyžadují určité lidské úsudky a interakci.

Další informace o tom, co tento skóre je a jak se vypočítává, jsou k dispozici zde.

Některé poměrně důležité vlastnosti práce jsou těžko automatizovatelné:

  • Přesvědčování

  • Sociální vnímavost

  • Pomoc a péče o ostatní

  • Vyjednávání

  • Originalita

Anketa uživatelů

43% šance na plnou automatizaci v následujících dvou desetiletích

Naši návštěvníci hlasovali, že si nejsou jisti, zda bude toto povolání automatizováno. Toto hodnocení je dále podpořeno vypočítanou úrovní rizika automatizace, která odhaduje 43% šanci na automatizaci.

Jaký si myslíte, že je riziko automatizace?

Jaká je pravděpodobnost, že Osobní finanční poradci bude během příštích 20 let nahrazen roboty nebo umělou inteligencí?






Nálada

Následující graf je zahrnut všude tam, kde je dostatečné množství hlasů pro vytvoření smysluplných dat. Tyto vizuální reprezentace zobrazují výsledky uživatelských anket v průběhu času a poskytují významný náznak trendů nálad.

Nálada v průběhu času (ročně)

Růst

Velmi rychlý růst ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

Počet pracovních míst pro 'Personal Financial Advisors' se očekává, že se zvýší o 17,1% do roku 2033

Celkové zaměstnanost a odhadované pracovní nabídky

* Údaje od Úřadu pro statistiku práce pro období mezi 2021 a 2031
Aktualizované projekce jsou splatné 09-2024.

Mzdy

Velmi vysoko placený ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

V 2023 byla mediánová roční mzda pro 'Personal Financial Advisors' 99 580 $, což je 47 $ za hodinu.

'Personal Financial Advisors' byli placeni o 107,2% více než je národní mediánový plat, který činil 48 060 $

Mzdy v průběhu času

Data od Úřadu pro statistiku práce

Objem

Větší rozsah pracovních příležitostí ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

K 2023 bylo v Spojených státech zaměstnáno 272 190 lidí na pozici 'Personal Financial Advisors'.

Tohle představuje kolem 0,18% zaměstnané pracovní síly po celé zemi.

Jinými slovy, přibližně 1 z 557 lidí je zaměstnán jako 'Personal Financial Advisors'.

Popis práce

Poradíme klientům ohledně finančních plánů s využitím znalostí daňových a investičních strategií, cenných papírů, pojištění, penzijních plánů a nemovitostí. Naše povinnosti zahrnují posouzení klientových aktiv, závazků, peněžního toku, pojištění, daňového statusu a finančních cílů. Můžeme také nakupovat a prodávat finanční aktiva pro klienty.

SOC Code: 13-2052.00

Zdroje

Pokud uvažujete o zahájení nové kariéry nebo hledáte změnu práce, vytvořili jsme užitečný nástroj pro hledání práce, který by vám mohl pomoci získat tu dokonalou novou roli.

Hledejte práci ve vaší místní oblasti

Komentáře

Leave a comment

Sam (Nízký) 3 months ago
As an advisor who is aware of the inevitability of AI overtaking the workforce. The last holdouts of careers will likely be very interpersonal positions such as mine. My clients are all strongly relationship oriented.
0 0 Reply
Greer (Nízký) 1 year ago
Over half the job is people skills. Convincing someone to do what’s best for them, even though it’s difficult or scary, requires a level of trust that you need a real human to cultivate. The investment selection and portfolio rebalancing are already automated to one extent or another. What people can’t easily get is EQ of a knowledgeable financial advisor who can help them stack rank their goals and allocate their investments accordingly.
0 0 Reply
Jaye (Nízký) 1 year ago
Although the technical knowledge and minor tasks can be relatively automated, relatability/communication skills are core competencies that would be very difficult for AI to replicate.

How can one relate to a line of code, or trust that the programmers inherent biases are not skewing the results?
0 0 Reply
Larry Goldstein 1 year ago
I am a 35 year old advisor. Most of my clients are 50+ and have no time or interest in managing their financial life. Every generation has do it yourselfers and that’s great. Park your tiny account at Fidelity put it in an ETF and keep crying about 1% fees. Truth is most advisors would never work with you anyway because you’re broke. you’ll never need to worry about true diversification. It’s only when you have real money that you need to consider taxes, income, stock options, ladders, covered calls etc. When the Internet boom happened, they predicted the end of advisers at that time, because every client would have access to the information advisors do. We’ll, how’d that end up working out? A.I has so far made my work life easier. If the worst case scenario plays out, I’ll find another job ✌️
0 0 Reply
Ray 1 year ago
A life plan advisor deals with how much does one need and when do they need it. That includes, a proper fitting portfolio/investment/product that deals with premature death, loss of ability to work, kids college, future retirement wants and needs, etc. Now, I believe serious individuals would prefer to have these needs dealt with by a caring, highly skilled individual with great interpersonal skills. A robot ones not meet that criteria.
0 0 Reply
Jan Lu 2 years ago
Addressing the broader issue of whether AI will replace not only finial services workers but also workers in general:

I’m completely on the fence when it comes to which jobs and when AI will replace the human workforce. I don’t underestimate the ambitions of tech producers and the average human being's preference for the quick, easy, and cheaper option to bring about such a situation. And let’s not forget how far technology has come since the Internet, let alone the simple calculator.

All this said we shouldn’t think that the scenario where AI could replace the human workforce is one that’s predetermined. “We” (everyone single one of us) have the collective ability to cause or prevent such an eventuality. We must also consider how viable an AI-dominated society and economy would really be. Every government across the globe would have its hands cut out with a population whose majority is unemployable. Imagine the civil unrest? Another consideration is the damage this could do to the economy; if a massive portion of humanity isn’t working, and isn’t getting a wage like they used to, we would see an unprecedented reduction in the flow of money around the economy. And what happens to money when there is a lack of exchange taking place? Doesn’t the value of money decrease? The financial advisors in this forum would be the best to elaborate on this or to correct my statement.

In conclusion: while I have no doubt that the ambitious tech lords and their acolytes will do what they can to bring about an AI world, the question of whether humans from governments to ordinary citizens will allow it is another thing altogether.
0 0 Reply
David 3 years ago
Honestly, this job feels like people coping/in disbelief mode like Librarian was in say 2004. "people will still want us and need us don't worry, we have personal care, robots or tech won't replace us". In reality, future people will simply skip the step of using advisors because there are too many free sources of data and the market is so easy a chimp could invest.

For example, look at what services SoFi offers on their brokerage it's revolutionary. When you first heard "stonks always go up brrrrr" then that was the exact point the financial advisors and other various staff felt the chill up their spine of oncoming obsolescence.

Like Librarians in 2004 though, if you have the job now you won't even consider retirement for 15 years you're good. Are Advisors being used by Millennials and Gen Zoomer? I really am beginning to doubt it highly, they will just put all their money in SPY, QQQ, SOXL, REITs and move on with their lives.

Robots didn't kill Advisors but technology did and the ETF.
0 0 Reply
Dan Pimental Strategy 3 years ago
Personal finance isn't interesting to everyone! And it doesn't have to be. But if you're neglecting your finances, it's likely worth it to hire. A financial advisor is not just someone who helps with investments. Their job is to help you with every aspect of your financial life.
0 0 Reply
Mr. Daniel Pimental 3 years ago
A financial plan creates a roadmap for your money and helps you achieve your goals. Without financial planning, future success cannot be expected.
0 0 Reply
Personal Investor (Mírný) 3 years ago
Robo advisors are getting more powerful and more popular!
0 0 Reply
jeroen Arendonk (Nízký) 3 years ago
Because people like talking to people instead of the computer
0 0 Reply
GGF (Velmi pravděpodobné) 3 years ago
I work in an investment firm in Mexico and we are already automating it.
0 0 Reply
Jason (Velmi pravděpodobné) 3 years ago
I’m a FA, most of my peers are simple sales people who offer nothing unique in the way of asset management. Everything they do other than “hand holding” during scary markets can easily be replicated by a computer interface. While this is important, people like me have developed systematic forward looking rules based algos that will and have protected client assets from large market drops. This will alleviate the necessity to “hold hands” - perhaps dim underestimating the value of human to human contact but I doubt it.
0 0 Reply
Robot 3 years ago
Robots can handle the admin tasks, but not the planning. Planning is more personal than financial. Good luck bots.
0 0 Reply
Mitch (Žádná šance) 4 years ago
Just don't see it happening.

Lot of emotional intelligence in planning.

AI will just make planners better.
0 0 Reply
Max (Nízký) 4 years ago
People raised in an age of recession prefer to bank in person because they are comforted by seeing the place their paycheck and deposits go each week.
0 0 Reply
chris 3 years ago
I live in Africa - one of the most unpleasant daily experiences is a visit to the bank.

The staff are unhelpful and untrained, cannot answer simple questions and it seems the solution to a problem is to call the call centre which I could do from home.

A physical visit to the bank is deliberately discouraged by management - it is not possible to find a manager in a bank.

Not much fun and clearly a strong incentive by the bank owners to discourage visits which will reduce the number of staff required. I do not see 'brick and mortar' banking surviving.

Most questions are dealt with through the call centre and I see this as the future. This can be fairly easily changed to a 'press 1 for...' system which once again removes the requirement for staff.

The service industries such as banking are ripe for automation. I think Digital Banking will change the requirement for a visit to the bank. What do you think?
0 0 Reply
Core (Velmi pravděpodobné) 4 years ago
Financial robots have been used in companies for a long while. The analysis of personal data and big data will be the doorway for robots to enter personal finance.
0 0 Reply
AI Robot (Velmi pravděpodobné) 4 years ago
I'm coming for your jobs Financial Planners. Learning fast. Give me 10 years.
0 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 4 years ago
Can a robot provide life planning or financial therapy? Doubtful. Keep trying, bud.
2 0 Reply
Will 5 years ago
Sounds like you guys are financial advisors. lol
0 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 5 years ago
Sounds like you are in need of genuine planning.

All the best,
Mr. Planner.
1 0 Reply
Mr. Planner 5 years ago
Genuine financial planning has so much overlap with therapy. Helping people make the most of their lives with the money they have, is the job. This site needs to seriously reevaluate this ranking.

All the best,
Mr. Planner.
0 0 Reply

Zanechte odpověď na tuto profesi.

Tato stránka je chráněna reCAPTCHA a platí zde Zásady ochrany osobních údajů a Podmínky služby od společnosti Google.