Právníci

Nízké riziko
30%
Kam byste chtěli jít dál?
Sdílejte své výsledky s přáteli a rodinou.
Nebo prozkoumejte tuto profesi podrobněji...
RIZIKO AUTOMATIZACE
VYPOČTENÝ
23%
(Nízké riziko)
HLASOVÁNÍ
36%
(Nízké riziko)
Average: 30%
POPTÁVKA PO PRACI
RŮST
5,2%
do roku 2033
MZDY
145 760 $
nebo 70,07 $ za hodinu
Objem
731 340
k datu 2023
SHRNUTÍ
SKÓRE PRÁCE
7,7/10

Lidé také zobrazili

Vypočítané riziko automatizace

23% (Nízké riziko)

Nízké riziko (21-40%): Práce na této úrovni mají omezené riziko automatizace, protože vyžadují kombinaci technických a lidsky orientovaných dovedností.

Další informace o tom, co tento skóre je a jak se vypočítává, jsou k dispozici zde.

Některé velmi důležité vlastnosti práce jsou obtížně automatizovatelné:

  • Vyjednávání

  • Přesvědčování

Některé poměrně důležité vlastnosti práce jsou těžko automatizovatelné:

  • Sociální vnímavost

  • Originalita

Anketa uživatelů

36% šance na plnou automatizaci v následujících dvou desetiletích

Naši návštěvníci hlasovali, že je malá šance, že tato profese bude automatizována. Toto hodnocení je dále podpořeno vypočítanou úrovní rizika automatizace, která odhaduje 23% šanci na automatizaci.

Jaký si myslíte, že je riziko automatizace?

Jaká je pravděpodobnost, že Právníci bude během příštích 20 let nahrazen roboty nebo umělou inteligencí?






Nálada

Následující graf je zahrnut všude tam, kde je dostatečné množství hlasů pro vytvoření smysluplných dat. Tyto vizuální reprezentace zobrazují výsledky uživatelských anket v průběhu času a poskytují významný náznak trendů nálad.

Nálada v čase (čtvrtletně)

Nálada v průběhu času (ročně)

Růst

Rychlý růst v porovnání s ostatními profesemi

Počet pracovních míst pro 'Lawyers' se očekává, že se zvýší o 5,2% do roku 2033

Celkové zaměstnanost a odhadované pracovní nabídky

* Údaje od Úřadu pro statistiku práce pro období mezi 2021 a 2031
Aktualizované projekce jsou splatné 09-2024.

Mzdy

Velmi vysoko placený ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

V 2023 byla mediánová roční mzda pro 'Lawyers' 145 760 $, což je 70 $ za hodinu.

'Lawyers' byli placeni o 203,3% více než je národní mediánový plat, který činil 48 060 $

Mzdy v průběhu času

Data od Úřadu pro statistiku práce

Objem

Výrazně širší škála pracovních příležitostí ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

K 2023 bylo v Spojených státech zaměstnáno 731 340 lidí na pozici 'Lawyers'.

Tohle představuje kolem 0,48% zaměstnané pracovní síly po celé zemi.

Jinými slovy, přibližně 1 z 207 lidí je zaměstnán jako 'Lawyers'.

Popis práce

Zastupujeme klienty v trestním a občanském soudním řízení a jiných právních řízeních, vypracováváme právní dokumenty nebo spravujeme nebo radíme klientům v právních transakcích. Můžeme se specializovat na jednu oblast nebo můžeme praktikovat široce v mnoha oblastech práva.

SOC Code: 23-1011.00

Zdroje

Hledejte práci ve vaší místní oblasti

Pokud uvažujete o zahájení nové kariéry nebo hledáte změnu práce, vytvořili jsme užitečný nástroj pro hledání práce, který by vám mohl pomoci získat tu dokonalou novou roli.

Hledejte práci ve vaší místní oblasti

Komentáře

Leave a comment

Gean G (Velmi pravděpodobné) 8 days ago
AI is already automating tasks and generating petitions
0 0 Reply
george (Mírný) 8 days ago
certain repetitive tasks are undeniably at risk of automation: doc review, research and pleadings. Actual trial advocacy certainly will not be, nor will tribunals. What is likely is a significant reduction in people actually doing the work
0 0 Reply
CArl (Velmi pravděpodobné) 18 days ago
your honor, reset to default settings, I am your programmer. Greatly believe that I am correct and opposing council is completely incorrect.
1 0 Reply
How dare you? 28 days ago
I don’t think artificial intelligence can completely replace the legal profession. However, it might corner lawyers who aren’t specialized and mostly handle general cases. In an era of increasingly uneven income distribution, people won’t want to pay high fees for something as simple as a response to a petition. Instead, they’ll turn to AI to draft petitions and handle their legal matters themselves, likely for free.

Therefore, the rise of AI also brings transformation to the legal profession. Are you specialized in a certain field? No problem—you’ll continue to earn a living. But if you’re handling general cases, that’s where trouble starts. You might not lose your job, but you might lose your income, which, in a way, amounts to the same thing.
1 0 Reply
bob123 12 days ago
To be honest, this is the best comment I've seen on this entire website. There's nothing about calling the job of lawyers easy or saying that even the most basic clerk job is impossible to automate simply because it fits into the profession of law.
I would, however, say that general cases may still need some lawyers as the depth of the issue becomes more complicated and just in case they want human insight (the same way that some people would still go onto Reddit to ask questions when ChatGPT can offer a faster response, and the same reason why people still phone accountants/lawyers for advice right now when AI like Perplexity have access to every single bit of legal knowledge with added citations).
0 0 Reply
Get Real (No Chance) 1 month ago
If you were a Judge or part of a Jury, would you be more likely to back the guy with a human lawyer or the one with an AI lawyer?
2 0 Reply
AC 25 days ago
Human lawyer. Interesting question.
1 0 Reply
Noof (Velmi pravděpodobné) 1 month ago
Half of law is discovery
0 0 Reply
im confused 12 days ago
...could you clarify what you mean on this?
0 0 Reply
Estelle (Nejistý) 2 months ago
they can argue their case, it's just that they need to have correct references
0 0 Reply
MATHEUS COSTA DE ARAUJO (Žádná šance) 2 months ago
There are numerous issues involved in being a lawyer. Knowing the law is one of them, but interpreting the law is another. Few people would trust robots to handle such important cases in their lives. Another thing that happens frequently is settlements. Robots don't have feelings, meaning that if a settlement seems advantageous from a rational point of view, the robot would suggest it's a good deal. However, emotionally, it might be a terrible agreement. I believe my explanation might have been a bit confusing, but I hope you understood.
5 0 Reply
Ronald J 3 months ago
There is no way an A.I. can take over the law!!!!! How scary
6 0 Reply
Matt F (Žádná šance) 3 months ago
No automation can accurately interpret the law without creating it's own legislation based on the parameters of existing legislation
5 0 Reply
علي يحيى 3 months ago
I don't believe that artificial intelligence can replace the legal profession, even to a small extent, because it is a human-centered profession.
5 0 Reply
Dariuosh (Velmi pravděpodobné) 4 months ago
Given that artificial intelligence has been used in some countries to advocate in divorce cases, it is expected that this profession will disappear in the next 20 years
1 10 Reply
Noah 4 months ago
i do NOT want an ai arguing for me in a court
9 0 Reply
Sean (Velmi pravděpodobné) 6 months ago
It's already happening. I'm an intern at a BigLaw company and all of our procedural and contractual people are already using AI and kinda concerned about it. The only part that won't be automated is litigation, but most cases are settled out of court so...
1 12 Reply
Marty (Žádná šance) 6 months ago
Not only does AI struggle to instantiate legal reasoning in reality, but on principle, it is a terrible idea to offload interpretation and reasoning to computers when it is about abstract concepts that govern the practical lives of human beings.
5 1 Reply
Mannara (Velmi pravděpodobné) 6 months ago
If the rules become easily categorized also connected, and we can simplify the situations, and the goal is not to find verity and justice, but just simply "rights" and economic goals, we can cut out the people to judge and AI can do it.
1 5 Reply
Marty 6 months ago
Nah, we don't want computers interpreting and arguing laws that govern human beings. Never. They can help with the tedium though.
6 2 Reply
Meriem Makri (Žádná šance) 6 months ago
New regulations are introduced daily, so the machines need to be updated regularly. Justice is not a field that can be easily automated because the profile of each individual seeking justice varies greatly, as do the ways in which the law is applied (such as mitigating circumstances, etc.).
10 1 Reply
Person (Mírný) 6 months ago
when analising details it can easily make a story, who cares how it is phrased if everyone agrees it makes sense
0 3 Reply
John (Žádná šance) 6 months ago
It requires nuanced opinion-formation and decision-making skills that cannot be replicated by a program. Not to mention, depending on the field, it may involve gut instinct and other talents which only humans have.
7 1 Reply
Jude Jordan 7 months ago
Lawyers will not be replaced by AI for a while because, regardless of how capable AI actually is in technical, ethical, and reasoning aspects, the people who will write into law and decide whether or not AI should be able to serve as lawyers, are themselves lawyers. The giant law industry as it is, will never allow for AI to legally serve as lawyers in the foreseeable future.
12 1 Reply
Bigmonkey123 (Nízký) 7 months ago
I think the puplic won’t really want a robot defending them
10 1 Reply
J 7 months ago
I worked in the job, and robots are nicer than many humans. And even professional receptionists.

They'll do less errors, and don't require sleep. No more receptionist that is away. Longer opening hours.

Why do you say robots have no empathy, you fillthy racist? They have it. Robots would probably beat you up.
2 17 Reply
'fillthy' racist, apparently 7 months ago
Robots have programmed empathy. They don't actually feel it, because it is a robot (could you guess?).
Not that I'd expect someone who doesn't even know the definition of 'racist' and just flings the word around however would know what empathy is...
And besides, you never even addressed what they said. They didn't even bring up empathy, as their point was about people not wanting a robot to defend them. You've brought up a completely nonsensical rebuttal to an argument that doesn't exist.
11 1 Reply

Zanechte odpověď na tuto profesi.

Tato stránka je chráněna reCAPTCHA a platí zde Zásady ochrany osobních údajů a Podmínky služby od společnosti Google.