Programátoři počítačů

70% (Vysoké riziko)

Vysoké riziko (61-80%): Práce v této kategorii čelí významné hrozbě z automatizace, protože mnoho jejich úkolů lze snadno automatizovat pomocí současných nebo blízkých budoucích technologií.

Další informace o tom, co tento skóre je a jak se vypočítává, jsou k dispozici zde.

Anketa uživatelů

Nálada

Následující graf je zahrnut všude tam, kde je dostatečné množství hlasů pro vytvoření smysluplných dat. Tyto vizuální reprezentace zobrazují výsledky uživatelských anket v průběhu času a poskytují významný náznak trendů nálad.

Mzdy

Velmi vysoko placený ve srovnání s ostatními profesemi

V 2023 byla mediánová roční mzda pro 'Computer Programmers' 99 700 $, což je 47 $ za hodinu.

'Computer Programmers' byli placeni o 107,4% více než je národní mediánový plat, který činil 48 060 $

Mzdy v průběhu času

Komentáře

Leave a comment

J 15 days ago

Robots aint gonna code themselves, if we get to that point then that's Skynet/matrix. Aka end of the world for everyone so who cares

1 0 Reply

John pork (Žádná šance) 24 days ago

it is because AI and robots require programming and without programmers, they cannot function

0 0 Reply

Emy (Velmi pravděpodobné) 25 days ago

Even though programming can demand thinking sometimes, 70% of the work is repetitive or the same across different business. Not only that, but 80% of the time you are not solving any complex problem that demands creativity or deep thinking.

3 0 Reply

Jersey Jim 19 days ago

You can convert from one language to another with AI and a developer is not protected by knowing Java vs C#. This further erodes job protection. Recreating the wheel will drastically stop in programming and I'd imagine known problems will converge to one solution.

0 0 Reply

@irton (Žádná šance) 1 month ago

Why do they already develop this, and AI is not smart enough to do more? To complement, it is good.

1 2 Reply

Cessna (Nejistý) 2 months ago

Some AI can program or help a person program like chatgpt

1 0 Reply

Siddhant Tambe (Nejistý) 2 months ago

In order for AI to truly replace a Human computer programmer job, they will need to be "human" enough to handle the multiple complexities of building a whole ecosystem of a software product, along with defining clients who has accurately specify requirement.
For instance, I asked ChatGPT to write me a simple code that creates a "conversation" with OpenAI's APIs. It could not even do that accurately.
Current likelihood of replacing a computer programmer is laughable at best. Maybe over 20 years there might be "some" progress.

4 1 Reply

pleb 22 days ago

To be honest, it's quite scary that most people think this job will be entirely replaced. If AI ever fully becomes "human enough" (as you said! That's a brilliant way to put it) to take over every single Computer Programmer job... well, I don't think we have to worry about whether CS Majors will get employed.

0 0 Reply

Some Programmer (Nízký) 2 months ago

We need programmers to make AI, the programmers themselves propel AI ahead by making new ideas, AI cannot do that it is simply using the knowledge it has to gen a quick answer for the user based on training, however i do believe that there is a chance that AI will replace humans if its way of thinking becomes completely identical as to a human would think and if quantum computing gets invented.

3 0 Reply

half-full 22 days ago

a good example of this would be asking an ai to generate a wineglass thats full to the brim; it cant because all the pictures online are half-full, lmao

0 0 Reply

Arsh (Mírný) 2 months ago

Some concepts like orginaltity and thinking can not be replicated, but base code is in danger

1 0 Reply

Somone (Mírný) 3 months ago

This job could be revamped/transformed but i don't think AI will take over completely because AI isn't good at randomness and complex thinking/problem solving so i think AI will be a tool that will assist coders, engineers, etc not take over completely.

2 0 Reply

random idiot (Žádná šance) 3 months ago

Don't Computer programmers code AI...

2 4 Reply

Distragin (Nízký) 3 months ago

The amount of Ai copying from one another is insane if one Ai makes a mistake it could be devastating to other AI informational sources. This is why coding and programming are minimal risk, AI is most likely just gonna copy each other leading to inefficient mayhem!

1 1 Reply

Jersey Jim 19 days ago

These reasons have little bearing on the push for automation. Modern DevOps can push out fixes quickly. Companies don't really suffer much from downtime or security breaches. AI only has to be good enough with slight imperfections to kill jobs. Companies have already be proven willing to eat some losses from self-checkouts versus cashiers. It is cold math. The cost savings will far exceed the losses from downtime or government fines.

0 0 Reply

Guilherme (Nízký) 3 months ago

Because client's need change and language models can't pick up nuances 100% of the time there will always be a place for programers. But the kind of tasks they perform might change.

1 0 Reply

darkmewtwo (Nízký) 3 months ago

Ask an ai to simplify code. It will not work

2 2 Reply

Wes (Žádná šance) 4 months ago

You still need someone to understand every line of code the AI produces. Although AI is decent at programming now, I am certain that we will always need a human to write code to some degree.

6 1 Reply

` (Nejistý) 5 months ago

I think that while there is a high chance that AI will be used to automate the creation of basic code, AI will always make mistakes that have to be corrected by humans who know what they're doing, and I don't think AI will replace programmers in the next ~20 years because of the need for complex and intricate code used in projects such as game engines.

10 3 Reply

Guy (Velmi pravděpodobné) 5 months ago

Already starting, automation has begun being used for coding in many places.

6 4 Reply

Adrian 3 months ago

Agreed. AI will continue to grow, and it learns faster than any human could. The only type of software development postions I see staying is the creation of new languages. However, these jobs will be very few and require an insanely high level of education and years of experience. Heck, these jobs are offshored right now.

1 0 Reply

Luke 4 months ago

Often incorrect and needs fixing though, at least from my experience.

4 0 Reply

Caro (Nízký) 5 months ago

There will probably be many bugs (Like how Ai has trouble with fingers), so no matter what, the job will be necessary.

5 5 Reply

Aiden (Mírný) 5 months ago

bc like it might but prob not and like it will always be important to have human programmers because if ai ever become sentient and gain their own objectives, they will have all the power in the world if they're the only ones that know how to run our code and stuff like that so yea it would be dangerous to give that much power away to them

1 7 Reply

Mistral Claude 8 months ago

Here is the thing my dudes. As professional programer (30 years on the job, so of that thing even replaces out job, I will surely be retired already anyway) I tried chatgpt, copilot, Claude and even Mistral for coding. They are all pretty darn helpful to code on nephew level...you know, that terrible code we got from a 3rd party to maintain? Yeah. It goes great on that level. It's also great to do start level stuff that has been done 1000s of times. Try doing something new though, or some actual logic, and they fail, always. And never even realize they are failing. The reason is pretty simple. what we have (the llms) are not real AIs. When (if) we have a real AI, then, the moment a computer can replicate human level programming, is also the moment the computer can code another AI doesn't it? What would happen if it can code a AI better than itself?

20 4 Reply

Jose 6 months ago

Some of the best programmers in the world are working daily to help improve ChatGTP and other models. The capabilities are quickly increasing and given some time they will be better than most programmers. So yes some very good programmers will have a job, but most will not be needed. You wrote the comment 2 months ago, there is now a new model which you thought was not possible 2 months ago. What will happen in another 2 months, or 2 years?

9 6 Reply

DB 2 months ago

New model does not not mean better solution always

0 0 Reply

Ritchie Duncan (Velmi pravděpodobné) 8 months ago

AI suites such as ChatGPT etc have the ability to code functions in a variety of languages and for various platforms. A simple description of the function to be created, along with the system, such as Visual Studio, Unity etc allows the code to be copied and pasted into the code base.
Arguably within the next 10 years, programmers, in the form we know them now, will be obsolete.

5 5 Reply

Socks 8 months ago

Until AI programs can always fix everything in e.g. app that is being made as well as in themselves they will be just a tool for already competent programmer that has to understand most details anyway.

5 1 Reply