概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

动物学家和野生动物生物学家

最小风险
19%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (19)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
14%
(最小风险)
投票
24%
(低风险)
Average: 19%
劳动力需求
增长
4.4%
到2033年
工资
$70,600
或每小时 $33.94
体积
17,100
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
6.7/10

人们还浏览了

律师
计算机程序员
演员
生物学家
平面设计师

计算自动化风险

14% (最小风险)

最小风险（0-20%）：这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低，因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力，创造力，强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调，使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 原创性

  • 社会洞察力

  • 谈判

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为24%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有14%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

动物学家和野生动物生物学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长4.4%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023，'Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists'的年度中位数工资为$70,600，或每小时$33。

'Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists'的薪资比全国中位工资高46.9%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，就业机会的下限范围较低。

截至2023，在美国有17,100人被雇佣为'Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说，大约每8 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists”。

工作描述

研究动物和野生动物的起源、行为、疾病、遗传学和生命过程。可能专门从事野生动物研究和管理。可能收集并分析生物数据，以确定当前和潜在的土地和水域栖息地使用对环境的影响。

SOC Code: 19-1023.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Thomas sangero (没有机会) 9 days ago
Because you need the human touch and skills (like being able to sneak and precice movement)
0 0 Reply
Clover (低) 2 months ago
An animal would barely act right around lets say a zookeeper, a robot would be crushed on the first day.
0 0 Reply
Paleoman77(I love Pooh) (低) 4 months ago
They have to have care for the animals, and the ability to improvise
0 0 Reply
Alex G. 5 months ago
This field doesn't require just research, it covers many advanced biological studies that simply can't be replicated by Artificial Intelligence. Field studies could require traveling and sorts, and there's no way computers can do that.
0 0 Reply
:] 5 months ago
I don't think AI could ever care for animals because of their different needs and changing patterns.
0 0 Reply
Lucy (没有机会) 5 months ago
A robot cannot care for an animal in the wild, animals are too unpredictable
0 0 Reply
Étienne Pinsonneault (低) 5 months ago
While humans keep finding better and alternative methods to study animals, AI, which is trained on already existing things only, cannot create new methods, and thus cannot discover new species. However, there is still a chance that it may happen for some parts of the job that are repetitive and the same thing over and over again. And for the physical part of going out into the wild, robots are NOT advanced enough to do all of that movement and to know where to go next.
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (不确定) 7 months ago
It's essentially researching, and AI has been learning more and more.
0 1 Reply
Viktor (低) 9 months ago
I voted low because you can not replace taking care of animals or studying animals with AI. Humans can somewhat understand animals and how they act, but I don't think AI think be able to feel empathy or care for animals like humans do.
0 0 Reply
ez (没有机会) 1 year ago
because the animals deserve love and care not just being left to be care by robots with no feelings for the animals
0 0 Reply
No comment (没有机会) 2 years ago
This job requires a lot of thinking on your feet which AI is not good at.
0 0 Reply
Stacy Fordyce 3 years ago
in 2020-2021 its very possible but I doubt that some robots are going to take over biology because they need human to create them and give them the info to do that. So really its all the human that study the wild life then give the robots info if you think about it.
0 0 Reply
Bryson Levake 1 year ago
I’m seeing this in 2023😂
0 0 Reply
Unknown (没有机会) 3 years ago
Robots and animals don't mix. Animals are living and wild, robots are tech and man made and we shouldn’t replace them.
0 0 Reply
Deyah (没有机会) 3 years ago
No way of replacing wildlife rangers with robots, because we all know robots can't nurture animals, their habitats as well as we can do it with more compassion
0 0 Reply
bill 4 years ago
robots are very good at collecting data but are really only good at doing one thing it could require many robots just to study in many fields and many robots to study the traits of the millions of organisms but technology is advancing at a quick rate so they might take over in the simpler areas
0 0 Reply
Jack Carroll (没有机会) 4 years ago
Robots will need maintenance as well as the animals so no
0 0 Reply
Sam Holiday (低) 5 years ago
Robots can't really have a connection with animals.
0 0 Reply
Alex (没有机会) 5 years ago
A field that requires flexible thought processes, where a project may not have an easily definable goal at the outset or need to have it's aims adjusted on the fly.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。