概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

特效艺术家和动画师

高风险
61%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (82)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
70%
(高风险)
投票
53%
(中等风险)
Average: 61%
劳动力需求
增长
4.3%
到2033年
工资
$99,060
或每小时 $47.62
体积
29,940
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
4.8/10

人们还浏览了

平面设计师
计算机程序员
律师
演员
网页开发者

计算自动化风险

70% (高风险)

高风险（61-80%）：这个类别的工作面临着来自自动化的重大威胁，因为他们的许多任务可以使用当前或近期的技术轻松自动化。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为53%。

我们的访客投票表示，他们不确定这个职业是否会被自动化。 然而，我们生成的自动化风险等级表明自动化的可能性要高得多：有70%的机会会被自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

特效艺术家和动画师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间的推移的情绪（季度）

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Special Effects Artists and Animators"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长4.3%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬非常高。

在2023，'Special Effects Artists and Animators'的年度中位数工资为$99,060，或每小时$47。

'Special Effects Artists and Animators'的薪资比全国中位工资高106.1%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，就业机会的下限范围较低。

截至2023，在美国有29,940人被雇佣为'Special Effects Artists and Animators'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说，大约每5 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Special Effects Artists and Animators”。

工作描述

使用电影、视频、计算机或其他电子工具和媒体制作特效或动画，用于计算机游戏、电影、音乐视频和商业广告等产品。

SOC Code: 27-1014.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Ele (Low) 4 months ago
As an artist, I'd give some doubt to this because I've seen the ropes done behind animation. Sure, AI can recreate animation, but at the same time it will not hold a candle to the quality human-made animation has. The way it constantly shifts between several art styles because it farms stolen media it's been fed which leads to major inconsistencies. Much more, it's rather impossible to make an "original" animated short made entirely out of AI. Why? Consistency (and originality) are the reason. I find that AI "generalizes" images to be able to create an image, which is difficult especially when it comes to pushing facial expressions because AI needs to farm hundreds of images to "understand" how to recreate the image. I don't think it's possible in the long run either because at some point in time IF society and the industry as a whole decides to just USE AI for everything, there's gonna be a lot of "inbreeding" happening. AI will feed on other AI because there's not gonna be anymore human-made images it can freely farm off of which results to the most whacked quality you'd think of. AI will make the most general looking animation that can ever exist, but that thing will lack the soul, the humanity, human-made animations have.
9 0 Reply
Sundew (适度) 4 months ago
Because a.i can already generate videos n stuff
0 4 Reply
August Nelson (适度) 4 months ago
With all the art AIs we already have, it is inevitable.
0 3 Reply
human (低) 4 months ago
originality and high quality
2 1 Reply
Moss (不确定) 4 months ago
Ai is smart, but also stupid. In time it could, but we dont know for sure.
1 2 Reply
bob (适度) 5 months ago
ai is getting better at making automated vidseos
0 2 Reply
Aaron (没有机会) 5 months ago
This requires soul and robots can’t replicate the soul that humans produce. Bad or otherwise.
6 1 Reply
Aizen 5 months ago
I saw a lot of highly likely comments, so as an artist I thought I should give my point of view.
I don’t think ai can replace these types of jobs as if you wanted to actually make a movie or series, you would still need a good plot and a storyboard and color for at least one frame and for the ending and beginning scene or else how would you make a movie that follows the exact plot and looks that you want. (if your an in-between artists.. uhhhh-)
an example would be any ghibli film. even if ai were to create a movie and make it look exactly the same, it’s not as appealing because every ghibli film not only takes years to make but uses traditional animation and hand draw each frame and that’s what makes it appealing and different from other films not because an ai made it in just 5 seconds.
5 0 Reply
Ahmed (极有可能) 5 months ago
Simply because of the hyper realistic AI that’s making these videos it’s becoming hard to tell what is real and what isn’t personally I think it’s going to be worse but it’s a high chance it may take over
0 3 Reply
Jason Chen (极有可能) 5 months ago
sora ai and generative video models can have a text input create any video or film imagery now, hence no need for armies of humans creating these works of digital art.
0 3 Reply
P3S4NT (极有可能) 5 months ago
ai art, it steals pieces of art without permission and merges them into something else.
1 2 Reply
Max Sky (适度) 6 months ago
ai animation could become super avalible from OpenAI Sora, ngl its scary, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YEX4t79e0Q
0 2 Reply
no >:( (低) 6 months ago
copyright and laws and stuff
2 0 Reply
Max Sky 6 months ago
it could change in the future you never know.
0 2 Reply
Bryan (student) 7 months ago
With the amount of new technology and AI coming through the years, people may think about robotic replacement in the industry of artists/designers. I don’t completely agree with them (maybe because I do want to make it my job in the future) but there will always have a limit and as we all know, technology, AI, computer, programming, etc… are made by humans. For me, technology should assist humans, doing daily task for example. But not replace them. And as we all says, they don’t have the originality, creativity of human being.
0 0 Reply
Ro (极有可能) 9 months ago
Sora AI
0 2 Reply
james adamson 10 months ago
Everyone here is looking at this from the perspective of a creative. I am also in that bucket, but when the bean counters see something cheaper and more efficient the little nuances and facets of human beauty and creativity will not be considered.
A powerful and forceful director/CEO/MD on board could swing that in human creativity's favour, but look at all the areas in production where the money goes for the lowest common denominator.
Art and money are not good bedfellows and AI art like plastic and industrial streamlining are where we are headed unfortunately.( IMHO.)While we got a bit cleverer at being efficient we will also get A LOT cheaper a lot saddder and A LOT more unpleasant on the eye!

From DaVinci to plastic impressions and AI interpretations of beauty.
I'm thinking of the film Brazil and a horrendous retail park I visited in LA! Gaudy gossip magazines cheap toy shops and the show Black Mirror!
0 0 Reply
armando camero 10 months ago
you'll be replaced by AI if the client is okay with 'good enough' . but you won't if the client needs minor detail adjustments and lots of precision and control
0 0 Reply
Navarone (极有可能) 1 year ago
Im a 3D rigging artist with 5+ years in the industry and if things keep going the way they are, i think that by 2040, 3D art is going to be just a few directors and producers using AI instead of a pipeline.
Art is dead.
0 1 Reply
JD (极有可能) 1 year ago
AI art is already being embraced in small ways. the complexity and quality is only going to grow out of convenience to bigger animation companies, and demand from film production studios.
0 1 Reply
Joe 1 year ago
If you'd posed this question to me just two years ago, my response would have been a firm "absolutely not." However, given the emergence of advanced AI generative models, my current perspective leans towards a scenario in which the role may not vanish entirely, but instead undergo a substantial reduction in workforce. So the hundreds of visual effects artists typically employed in a film's production might dwindle down to 5-10 individuals
0 1 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。