概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

公共安全电信员

中等风险
40%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (20)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
46%
(中等风险)
投票
35%
(低风险)
Average: 40%
劳动力需求
增长
4.0%
到2033年
工资
$48,890
或每小时 $23.50
体积
97,820
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
5.1/10

人们还浏览了

学前教师，小学教师，初中教师，高中教师，特殊教育教师
计算机程序员
律师
警察和警长巡逻官员
会计师和审计师

计算自动化风险

46% (中等风险)

中等风险（41-60%）：中等风险的职业通常涉及常规任务，但仍需要一些人类的判断和交互。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化：

  • 帮助和照顾他人

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 社会洞察力

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为35%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有46%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

公共安全电信员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Public Safety Telecommunicators"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长4.0%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪资较低

在2023，'Public Safety Telecommunicators'的年度中位数工资为$48,890，或每小时$23。

'Public Safety Telecommunicators'的薪资比全国中位工资高1.7%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，更大的就业机会范围

截至2023，在美国有97,820人被雇佣为'Public Safety Telecommunicators'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.06%

换句话说，大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Public Safety Telecommunicators”。

工作描述

操作电话、无线电或其他通信系统，接收并传达在9-1-1公共安全应答点和紧急操作中心的紧急援助请求。从公众和其他来源获取有关犯罪、威胁、骚乱、恐怖主义行为、火灾、医疗紧急情况以及其他公共安全事项的信息。可能需要协调并向执法和紧急响应人员提供信息。如有需要，可能会访问敏感数据库和其他信息源。根据对执法、消防或紧急医疗程序的知识和认证，可能会向来电者提供额外的指示。

SOC Code: 43-5031.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Dan/911 Dispatcher (极有可能) 1 year ago
Protocol based yes/no programs are becoming the norm in this industry. An AI program that can have a conversation with a 911 caller and interpret the results will replace 911 calltakers. Field units can input requests into an AI interface in their vehicle resulting in very little need for radio operators.
0 0 Reply
Maria (低) 1 year ago
As a police Dispatcher, no matter how intelligent AI may become, in my opinion, there will always be a need for the human factor to communicate with people in distress.
0 0 Reply
Alex (低) 3 years ago
Robots might not be able to filter out prank calls and if there are too many calls the system might break down.
0 0 Reply
Noname 3 years ago
Some people die being police so robots will take over the job for safety reasons
0 0 Reply
주연재 4 years ago
My future job is a police officer and I don't think this job can be handled by artificial earthworks in the future. The reason is that errors occur in the process of reasoning, or that they are not accurate and specific, and that the actual criminal cannot be caught.
0 0 Reply
Hyewon 4 years ago
Because it is only human beings who can help and soothe someone who is in danger without having feelings.
0 0 Reply
feeeek (低) 4 years ago
Maybe in 2050 they'd have robot dispatchers but no robot is climbing a tree or going into a active bank robbery with hostages.
0 0 Reply
no, no name for me (没有机会) 4 years ago
i don't personally believe so, because i don't think that a robot would be able to adapt to a situation as possibly complicated as that. "911, press 1 for kidnapping, press 2 for..." sure it would be better than that but you get the idea. I also believe that if someone is in crisis who can relate more and help calm someone down? The human can that's who.
0 0 Reply
Keji Alex (没有机会) 4 years ago
Robots can't do what humans do.
0 0 Reply
Warwick 4 years ago
I don't think the people who work as dispatchers are going to be easily replaced. They perform a complex job, integrating a heap of different inputs, often working with incomplete information (for example a phone call that's initially just silent, or someone who can't talk freely due to injury or duress). They have to highly developed interpersonal skills both in working with the public and working with the front-line staff (e.g. the police on the beat). I can't see something like Siri replacing them.
0 0 Reply
Olivia (适度) 4 years ago
Because robots can't die in which cases humans can
0 0 Reply
Shaneika (没有机会) 5 years ago
Because then what is the point of being around or some people won’t like robots and they could be scared of them because they have no feelings and they are just programmed
0 0 Reply
hannie (低) 5 years ago
because robots don't see everything and robots don't compare to humans. also robots can get broken and cant do things humans can.
0 0 Reply
Bob (低) 5 years ago
I can't see the average citizen being perfectly fine being subvert to robot overlords.
0 0 Reply
Hope Pringle (不确定) 5 years ago
It could go either way we might have robots that take this job which I don't want because robots have no emotion for the community like the men in blue do who everyday care for us. And I want to serve the community I care about every day and protect them when the robots can't and can't feel emotion for the people who are victims every day.
0 0 Reply
Somebody (极有可能) 5 years ago
With AI and machine learning, the need for cops will be minimal as a lot of what could happen can be predicted and prevented. Look at minority report.
0 0 Reply
connor cathcart (没有机会) 5 years ago
robots cant do what people do
0 0 Reply
not gonna say (没有机会) 5 years ago
They are not likely to take jobs from police, they can't run or tackle
0 0 Reply
Khan 4 years ago
call dispatchers are not police officers they hear the calls and send them to the police.
They are already automated in Chicago.
0 0 Reply
Khan 4 years ago
This is about call dispatchers for police, NOT cops.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。