概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

制片人和导演

低风险
29%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (16)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
33%
(低风险)
投票
25%
(低风险)
Average: 29%
劳动力需求
增长
8.0%
到2033年
工资
$82,510
或每小时 $39.67
体积
154,470
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
7.7/10

人们还浏览了

演员
计算机程序员
平面设计师
律师
作家和作者

计算自动化风险

33% (低风险)

低风险（21-40%）：这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低，因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 社会洞察力

  • 原创性

  • 谈判

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为25%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有33%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

制片人和导演在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，非常快速的增长。

预计"Producers and Directors"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长8.0%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023，'Producers and Directors'的年度中位数工资为$82,510，或每小时$39。

'Producers and Directors'的薪资比全国中位工资高71.7%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，更大的就业机会范围

截至2023，在美国有154,470人被雇佣为'Producers and Directors'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.10%

换句话说，大约每983人中就有1人被雇佣为“Producers and Directors”。

工作描述

负责制作或导演舞台、电视、广播、视频或电影制作，用于娱乐、信息或教学。负责创意决策，如剧本的解读，选择演员或嘉宾，舞台设计，音效，特效和舞蹈编排。

SOC Code: 27-2012.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Marley (低) 4 days ago
I think this job cannot be taken because it requires a uniquely human artistic vision.
0 0 Reply
Craig (没有机会) 6 months ago
Artistic Vision requires originality and creativity, bending the rules rather than following them completely. Working with people as well.
0 0 Reply
Aditya Narayan Meena (没有机会) 1 year ago
Robots will never be able to make Films that truly relate with Human feelings & emotions.
0 0 Reply
Abhinaba Dutta (极有可能) 1 year ago
I am a budding filmmaker and I feel really heart broken since it is inevitable that filmmakers, actors, writers, singers, musicians, will be replaced by AI in the future
0 0 Reply
EC (低) 1 year ago
requires careful interpersonal relationships, negotiation, interpretation of project needs, sourcing of appropriate suppliers, coordination of multiple resources and shifting timelines, budgets and deliverables.
0 0 Reply
Bob Lillith (极有可能) 1 year ago
Most entertainment is going to AI generative. Efficiency will mean one director or producer will be able to do more projects in a smaller amount of time, reducing the numbers needed. I would say not eliminated but reduced greatly
0 0 Reply
Martin (低) 1 year ago
One problem is that you have combined “producers“ with “directors“. These are two completely different jobs, though they are sometimes done by the same person.
Directors main role is to watch video and talk to actors. For machine learning, you would need a huge database of director comments in order to generate the necessary remarks. I’m not sure how this would be done.
Producer‘s job is to organise shoots and arrange funding. This is much easier to automate.
I would produce a risk at 40%, director risk, 20%.
0 0 Reply
Aleksandra (适度) 1 year ago
AI can understand the sentiment, and emotional interactions between partners on screen, as well as analyze lighting, composition, and scripts. I wouldn't feel safe.
0 0 Reply
R 2 years ago
If AI can eventually create a short film in UE5, why can't it make TV sitcoms? For sure, there's little creative cinematography due to time constraints, and limits, and it could even enhance the medium due to the aforementioned limits in the real world.
0 0 Reply
Saketh 4 years ago
Robots can't be provided with perfect human emotions which is the most essential thing needed for a story writer or film director
0 0 Reply
윤인정 4 years ago
My future job is pd.
I don't think artificial intelligence can replace my job. I think that he is a person who communicates with many people and creates programs that deliver emotions and fun to many people. I don't think robots can bring as much imagination as humans.
0 0 Reply
Sal 10 months ago
I currently work as a producer. It's absolutely a job that can be done by AI. It requires no real creativity at all. Producers like to think they're having a creative input, but they're really not. AI could easily create Gantt charts and schedules and let the creatives be creative.
0 0 Reply
BibirMengkeroet 2 years ago
It could be possible that AI replaces film producer/directors, however when that happen, all of workers that supposed to be coordinated by PD would already replaced by AI. If that happens, what is the point of PD anyways?
0 0 Reply
Vishnu (没有机会) 4 years ago
AI cannot perceive the infinite.
0 0 Reply
Lemar (没有机会) 5 years ago
I don’t see why there would be a need to replace human film directors with robots
0 0 Reply
Dmytro Kozlov (不确定) 5 years ago
AI and Human Film director could get on with each other in a wide spectrum of directions both like operation and technology management and creative process upgrade
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。