政治学家

自动化风险
计算出的
31%
风险等级
投票
20.0%
根据 344 票的投票结果
劳动力需求
增长
6.2%
到2032年
工资
$128,020
或每小时 $61.54
体积
5,660
截至 2022
摘要
工作评分
7.2/10

想在您的网站上显示这个摘要吗?嵌入代码:

自动化风险

31% (低风险)

低风险(21-40%):这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低,因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 社会洞察力

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为20.0%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性极小。 然而,我们生成的自动化风险等级暗示了更高的自动化可能性:31%的自动化机会。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

政治学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表会在有大量投票数据可以呈现有意义的数据时包含在内。这些视觉表示显示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了对情绪趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业的快速增长

预计"Political Scientists"的工作空缺数量将在2032内增长6.2%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2023到期.

工资

相对于其他职业,薪酬非常高

在2022,'Political Scientists'的年度中位数工资为$128,020,或每小时$61。

'Political Scientists'的薪资比全国中位工资高176.4%,全国中位工资为$46,310。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,显著较低的就业机会范围。

截至2022,在美国有5,660人被雇佣为'Political Scientists'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每26 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Political Scientists”。

工作描述

研究政治系统的起源、发展和运作。可能研究的主题包括公众意见、政治决策和意识形态。可能分析政府的结构和运作,以及各种政治实体。可能进行公众意见调查,分析选举结果,或分析公共文件。

SOC Code: 19-3094.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Daniel xavier (没有机会)说
Political science is not an exact science. there are thousands of variations that even with a lot of data a MACHINE, which is basically made of zeros and ones, would not be able to understand, including, for us to understand politics we need a perspective of the world that is not necessarily being glimpsed on the internet, because, after all, there are biases that the lens of social media makes us have, we basically become much more prone to fights on the internet than in real life, and, as far as we know, robots are only powered through the internet and data scientific.

and even in terms of scientific data, they cannot be used in their entirety to create a portrait of current politics, as there are ideas that only current affairs can provide. such as the change in mass media that stopped being through TV, radio and newspapers and moved completely, or partially, to the internet, another of these changes is the undeniable access to social networks. These changes are so important that they have changed the current political scenario in a significant way, but as I said previously, they do not demonstrate the totality of human relations, an issue that also has significant changes such as, for example, the rise of Fenism, the increase in the rights of populations to deny and native peoples, segregation and emancipation of gender choices and sexual options, these changes that are very important and significant for humanity in general, were somewhat forced into the algorithm internally, something that, recently in the few weeks before the publication on March 5, 2023 of this comment caused problems in images that contained falsifications and delusions of reality, such as an image that contained two women, including one black, in the American legislature in the 19th century, a time when not even women Not even black people participated directly in the US political system, that is, they did not vote and could not be voted for any political position.

in short, for a robot to be a political scientist, it would need to be within the bonds of social reality, that is, to be, living in the real world, to be outside the binary system, something that is literally impossible even with a quantum computer as it would return to the binary system because this is the universal basis of computing, not just being made up of databases and having a perspective created by your life experiences and never in any way trying to have an answer for everything, as this can generate machine delusions. That's not human-centrism on my part, it's just an observation of reality. Furthermore, it is worth adding that a being cannot create a being more intelligent than itself, it is a basic mathematical concept, that is, it is not the AI ​​that will become more intelligent than humans, it is the human being that will become more stupid every day.
Mar 05, 2024 at 09:23 下午
Francisco (没有机会)说
Politics are fundamentally human and unpredictable, it's not going to be dealt with or solved by mathematics or any computer program.
May 04, 2023 at 10:15 上午
Galo (极有可能)说
OpenAI has managed to now beat the lawyer bar exam with high precision, this improvement took place in the span of less than a year, with these changes, in a few years political theory could easily be replaced by AI based on gathered data of all political theory.
Mar 15, 2023 at 08:20 下午
Milan说
A lawyer is a pretty different job compared to a political scientist though. The big distinction is that lawyers make arguments based on laws and prior court cases. There is some novel and creative thinking in formation of arguments, but they are bound by the law. Politics is a much more human and sociologically based branch. Local politics can also be quite grassroots and not suitable for AI attempting to gather data or understand human responses.
Apr 26, 2024 at 01:40 上午
Waka Waka (低)说
I hate artificial intelligence.
Apr 20, 2021 at 01:39 下午
Morpheus说
If robots ever become aware enough to become politicians, you will likely see robot governments form and pretty quickly you basically have the story of The Animatrix, humans will just be enslaved after a long war and put into machines that will simulate the world.
Jul 05, 2019 at 03:17 下午
Juan说
A politician is not the same as a political scientist...
Oct 01, 2021 at 06:24 下午
Anonymous (没有机会)说
Political science is a concept that can only be interpreted and actually developed upon by human minds. Robots will not be able to perceive politics on such a scale that entire parliaments will be replaced or assisted by them, as robots tend to overlook major factors.
Apr 08, 2019 at 07:37 下午
GPT3说
Transhumanism is becoming a reality every day, and robots are being trained to recognize complex patterns even better than humans.

Political information can be overwhelming, but advanced algorithms have the ability to process it faster and more accurately than any human.

There is no reason why we cannot replace or assist entire parliaments with robots and artificial intelligence, if we wish.
Jan 15, 2023 at 10:35 下午
Darius Rashidi说
You really can't use technology to replicate the mix of eerie neuroticism and ambiguous, vain narcissism required to make a true political scientist.
Apr 02, 2019 at 03:20 下午

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。

人们还浏览了

律师
计算机程序员
会计师和审计师
学前教师,小学教师,初中教师,高中教师,特殊教育教师
平面设计师