政治学家
人们还浏览了
计算自动化风险
低风险（21-40%）：这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低，因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。
有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。
用户投票
我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有29%的机会实现自动化。
你认为自动化的风险是什么？
政治学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？
情感
以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。
随着时间（每年）的情绪变化
增长
预计"Political Scientists"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长2.6%
总就业人数和预计的职位空缺
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.
工资
在2023，'Political Scientists'的年度中位数工资为$132,350，或每小时$63。
'Political Scientists'的薪资比全国中位工资高175.4%，全国中位工资为$48,060。
随着时间推移的工资
体积
截至2023，在美国有5,580人被雇佣为'Political Scientists'。
这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%
换句话说，大约每27 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Political Scientists”。
工作描述
研究政治系统的起源、发展和运作。可能研究的主题包括公众意见、政治决策和意识形态。可能分析政府的结构和运作，以及各种政治实体。可能进行公众意见调查，分析选举结果，或分析公共文件。
SOC Code: 19-3094.00
资源
如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。
评论
and even in terms of scientific data, they cannot be used in their entirety to create a portrait of current politics, as there are ideas that only current affairs can provide. such as the change in mass media that stopped being through TV, radio and newspapers and moved completely, or partially, to the internet, another of these changes is the undeniable access to social networks. These changes are so important that they have changed the current political scenario in a significant way, but as I said previously, they do not demonstrate the totality of human relations, an issue that also has significant changes such as, for example, the rise of Fenism, the increase in the rights of populations to deny and native peoples, segregation and emancipation of gender choices and sexual options, these changes that are very important and significant for humanity in general, were somewhat forced into the algorithm internally, something that, recently in the few weeks before the publication on March 5, 2023 of this comment caused problems in images that contained falsifications and delusions of reality, such as an image that contained two women, including one black, in the American legislature in the 19th century, a time when not even women Not even black people participated directly in the US political system, that is, they did not vote and could not be voted for any political position.
in short, for a robot to be a political scientist, it would need to be within the bonds of social reality, that is, to be, living in the real world, to be outside the binary system, something that is literally impossible even with a quantum computer as it would return to the binary system because this is the universal basis of computing, not just being made up of databases and having a perspective created by your life experiences and never in any way trying to have an answer for everything, as this can generate machine delusions. That's not human-centrism on my part, it's just an observation of reality. Furthermore, it is worth adding that a being cannot create a being more intelligent than itself, it is a basic mathematical concept, that is, it is not the AI that will become more intelligent than humans, it is the human being that will become more stupid every day.
Political information can be overwhelming, but advanced algorithms have the ability to process it faster and more accurately than any human.
There is no reason why we cannot replace or assist entire parliaments with robots and artificial intelligence, if we wish.
关于这个职业请留下您的评论