概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

物理学家

最小风险
11%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (40)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
0.6%
(最小风险)
投票
22%
(低风险)
Average: 11%
劳动力需求
增长
7.2%
到2033年
工资
$155,680
或每小时 $74.84
体积
18,350
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
8.3/10

人们还浏览了

计算机程序员
律师
机械工程师
网页开发者
平面设计师

计算自动化风险

0.6% (最小风险)

最小风险（0-20%）：这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低，因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力，创造力，强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调，使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化：

  • 原创性

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 社会洞察力

  • 说服

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为22%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有0.6%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

物理学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业的快速增长

预计"Physicists"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长7.2%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬非常高。

在2023，'Physicists'的年度中位数工资为$155,680，或每小时$74。

'Physicists'的薪资比全国中位工资高223.9%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，就业机会的下限范围较低。

截至2023，在美国有18,350人被雇佣为'Physicists'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说，大约每8 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Physicists”。

工作描述

进行物理现象的研究，基于观察和实验发展理论，并设计方法来应用物理定律和理论。

SOC Code: 19-2012.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Guest 17 days ago
AI already taking over math (in summer 2024 AI reached silver medal at IMO) so I think physics is next in order to be replaced and automated... So math and physics very related to each other so there no chance for both of them
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (低) 2 months ago
Honestly, robots only have have so much processing power, and with today’s tech, (and possibly tomorrow’s) it’s just not possible to run such complex calculations.
0 0 Reply
E (没有机会) 2 months ago
Physics requires complex models and creativity that artificial intelligence can not replicate without a human mind.
0 0 Reply
Oliver Cavendish 2 months ago
differentiating between experimental and theoretical physicists, i think that there is a chance that experimental physics will be replaced by automation in the near future especially as nuclear engineering also comes under this bracket and the militaries of major world powers such as America, China and India are looking to incorporate more cyber-warfare and robotics into their offensive (and defensive) technologies and there is also a high chance that as other fields like chemistry, for example, begin to get automated, experimental physics will too. but theoretical physics, on the other hand, is the purest discipline of science there is. it requires originality, innovation, creativity, fun, a genuine interest in science and physics for its own sake and the ability to make coherent theories and hypotheses based on observations and data gathered of and from natural phenomena. this, at least in the near future, is something that AI is thoroughly incapable of doing. so on the whole, no, theo.physicists' shouldn't be going anywhere; exp.physicists on the other hand..............unless, of course, elon surprises us again with a sentient AI that can actually take over everything and become the next SkyNet!
1 1 Reply
Saket (低) 5 months ago
I think that robots will not be able to find new things as of right now they can only use a database and find things out of there a robot doesnt have enough creativity to look out into space for example and think"Hmm why is it moving" for something htat shouldnt move it is just gonna see it and be like"cool"
1 0 Reply
Samik Yanque Amable (没有机会) 5 months ago
A pure science is a kind of art where your creativity must shine to observe problems and devise solutions. The truth is, it hurts to think that my future will be filled with the anxiety of "finding a problem" that is relevant to science, but it's the hell I chose.

If any junior reads this message, I can only wish you the best. While your work is irreplaceable by AI, your future will be filled with problems where AI cannot assist you. Good luck.
2 0 Reply
Alec 4 months ago
Thank you. I am 12, and this is my dream job. Seeing this message really made me excited!
2 1 Reply
9 (没有机会) 1 year ago
We teach AI. That's how it understands. Although it can learn, it can't accumulate pure factual knowledge by itself.
0 0 Reply
Jamie (极有可能) 1 year ago
Hard science fields will be the easiest fields for AI to take-over.
0 2 Reply
MainEditor 8 months ago
But if AI can do hard science why it wouldn't as easy do soft science?
1 0 Reply
Zuzia (适度) 1 year ago
AI can already teach itself new things and it escalates very quickly, it probably will be able to analyze all the knowledge we have on Earth and come to some important conclusions.
1 0 Reply
Samuel (没有机会) 1 year ago
It requires thinking outside the box, solving new problems, writing new programs. It has already implemented computers for calculations.
0 0 Reply
Toast (没有机会) 1 year ago
Being a physicist requires, at least to a certain degree, being able to come up with purely original ideas, rather than interpolating the existing body of knowledge.
3 0 Reply
Quarked_Out (低) 1 year ago
Hmm, a lot of areas in physics do incorporate ML techniques and AI to some degree. However, people with physics training play an undisputedly dominant role in research.

If anything, I can see some simulation aspects or redundant experimental procedures being automated in the near term. But parts that incorporate creative problem solving or the physical intuition needed in determining directions to take research are things that are pretty safeguarded to humans for a bit.

I think those "intuitions" are very difficult to map to general problem-solving algorithms.
0 0 Reply
Brian (No Chance) 2 years ago
Many other experimental physicists and I already automate every measurement we can, but there is still plenty of work to do.
1 0 Reply
David (没有机会) 2 years ago
I wonder what all those people were thinking when they said there was a realistic possibility that physicists will be obsolete in 20 years. That's absurd on its face and every physicist I have ever met would agree.

We can have a discussion on whether it is possible in the next 200 years, sure, but 20 years? That's laughable. Given that only physicists are qualified to write, train, and optimize the algorithms that would be used to replace them, it will take a long, long, long time.

I suspect that we would need true machine sentience before we could actually start to talk about replacing theoretical and mathematical physicists.
0 0 Reply
Bimsara Bodaragama (没有机会) 2 years ago
It's more about intuition and innovativeness. Of course, we will use more tools, but with Physics, since we interpret as we observe (there is a little problem with that conclusion, though), AI may not be able to take it over.
0 0 Reply
Wesley I (没有机会) 3 years ago
I believe that it will be possible but not for a very long time, the process of positing new questions and then solving them is rather complex and I'm guessing that it will be at least 100 years before the jobs of theoretical physicists start to become threatened.
0 0 Reply
just bored (没有机会) 3 years ago
Even though computers may get more intelligent than us humans, there is still a very small chance because computers don't have the basic questioning ability which we humans have
0 0 Reply
Rowan (不确定) 3 years ago
The development of AI is rapidly improving, AI maybe 10 years in the future being able to predict or understand the universe better through random generation or pure knowledge is very probable. However I doubt they will replace Physicists in the near decade it should be very increasingly possible.
0 0 Reply
rafel 3 years ago
We are users of AI to improve some calculations and we need robots and AI for experimental precision and performance. Until the singularity, we will be in charge.
0 0 Reply
Pinaki Patra 3 years ago
A huge section of theoretical physicists do algorithm based research, which can easily be replaced by automation.
However, Philosophy based theoretical research is difficult to be replaced.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。