摄影师

自动化风险
计算出的
24%
风险等级
投票
34%
根据 620 票的投票结果
劳动力需求
增长
8.9%
到2032年
工资
$40,170
或每小时 $19.31
体积
47,380
截至 2022
摘要
工作评分
5.8/10

想在您的网站上显示这个摘要吗?嵌入代码:

自动化风险

24% (低风险)

低风险(21-40%):这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低,因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 原创性

  • 美术

  • 社会洞察力

  • 手工熟练度

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为34%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有24%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

摄影师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表会在有大量投票数据可以呈现有意义的数据时包含在内。这些视觉表示显示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了对情绪趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业的快速增长

预计"Photographers"的工作空缺数量将在2032内增长8.9%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2023到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪资较低

在2022,'Photographers'的年度中位数工资为$40,170,或每小时$19。

' Photographers '的薪酬比全国中位工资低13.3%,全国中位工资为$46,310。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,工作机会的适中范围。

截至2022,在美国有47,380人被雇佣为'Photographers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每3 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Photographers”。

工作描述

拍摄人物、风景、商品或其他主题。可能使用照明设备来增强主题的外观。可能使用编辑软件来制作完成的图像和印刷品。包括商业和工业摄影师、科学摄影师和摄影记者。

SOC Code: 27-4021.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

留下评论

Laurentiu Juravle (低)说
I think that photography is a mix of emotion, talent, and technique. Sure, a robot can make a picture as beautiful as mine, but it can't capture the precious moments like a photographer.
Mar 28, 2024 at 09:26 下午
Owen (低)说
Humans taking photographs of the world is a much more accurate and valuable approach rather than having AI generated images etc. It's more authentic
Aug 21, 2023 at 04:36 下午
Tomeu Ozonas (极有可能)说
Product CGI plus Generative AI will supply most photographic needs, such as home decor and food. Stock images will be absorbed and or replaced by Generative AI. Blockchain digital watermarks can help to save some traditional artistic and commercial photography.
Aug 05, 2023 at 09:49 上午
Laurel说
I'm a photographer, and the photography industry is doomed. AI image generation technology already exists, so all that has to happen is for it to become mainstream enough to be cheap to produce and add to most smartphones. Not only will the image quality be better, but it can also produce multiple images at once. In fact, AI images can even be copyrighted in some countries. The worst part is that since photographers are not paid much, there will not be much motivation to save the industry.
Jan 10, 2023 at 12:50 上午
Tacio Philip说
A lot of photographers' jobs can easily be replaced by automated drones and some AI to select frames from a high-definition video. There's no secret or creativity in many photography jobs (almost all social events, products...).

And yes, I'm a professional photographer, but as Galileo told us, we are not the center of the universe. :-P
Sep 11, 2022 at 04:46 下午
jenna talia (极有可能)说
drones. drones will fly around and take pictures
Mar 14, 2022 at 09:09 下午
Jo (低)说
I think that a robot could take a photo if it was trained to, but it could never see beauty or creativity like a human.

For example, a robot could take photos with the correct settings and a cool angle, but a robot could never look at something and realize the true beauty and emotions that a human could feel.

So, a robot might take a photo with the correct ISO, AP, SP, and an angle that it has been programmed to look at. But never emotions because in the end, it's a machine.
Jan 03, 2022 at 06:01 下午
jagbar (极有可能)说
Already happening with AI photos
Apr 22, 2021 at 09:17 上午
Abby (没有机会)说
Robots could not take over the personal touch and creative ideas photographers use in every single shot. There is not programing that could replace a person for this job.
Mar 30, 2021 at 06:18 下午
isuzu222说
The only reason this won't be replaced by robots is because the pay is so low there is no real reason to actively try to replace the profession. Also, this is easily a hobby profession/'freelancing' and will continue to have its niche just like we still have people using the Polaroids for fun.
Mar 04, 2021 at 06:08 上午
Derek说
Cashiers will be replaced and they are paid even less.
Sep 17, 2023 at 04:24 上午
Ryan (极有可能)说
Several forms of photography, particularly product photography, have already been largely automated with locations where you can bring your product, place it in a lightbox set, and AI assists the (non-photographer) customer in taking a series of professionally lit product shots. They're quite effective, will be easy to expand to new locations. Many of the techniques will eventually be possible to extend to portrait photography as well.

AI algorithms are already deeply progressed in combing through google street view to crop and process landscape and urban photography according to classical composition standards. At this point, the primary limiting factor is the sample quality, but much of the principles used will be possible to extend to drones surveying scenic areas.

While the small field of fine art photography will likely be unaffected, the majority of commercial or stock applications of photography are very likely to be done "well enough" by automatization to satisfy the primary customers of the field.
Oct 15, 2020 at 07:07 上午
Celso Ribeiro (低)说
Atividade que envolve dinâmica com grande variação que não se prevê..e o fator determinante que o robô (IA) não vai atingir...a Sensibilidade Humana.
Oct 02, 2019 at 03:37 下午
xenon2 (适度)说
AI can measure photo quality and take "infinite" number of photos, then based on selection will select best shots.
Imagine ball with lenses floating around, then from 100k pictures 100 is selected, based on "rememberability" and other defined patterns trained from famous photographers.
Aug 26, 2019 at 11:56 上午
Suffyim说
I think one reason photography will not be entirely automated is because robots can't exactly be inspired by anything.

From the little experience I have, I know it takes more than being knowledgeable and aware of the techniques of photography to take a good photo. Sure, it plays a role, but you need to feel emotion from the image to know that it is a good photo.

An AI can't do that.
Sep 06, 2022 at 04:24 上午
E说
I think e-commerce photography that is very technical could be replaced by robots but from my experience, I think it very unlikely and hard to imagine that robots will do better than agency talents for editorial/creative photography
Mar 28, 2019 at 02:25 下午

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。

人们还浏览了

平面设计师
计算机程序员
律师
网页开发者
电影和视频编辑器