摄影师

低风险
36%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (17)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
34%
(低风险)
投票
37%
(低风险)
Average: 36%
劳动力需求
增长
3.9%
到2033年
工资
$40,760
或每小时 $19.59
体积
53,630
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
4.4/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

34% (低风险)

低风险(21-40%):这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低,因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 原创性

  • 美术

  • 社会洞察力

  • 手工熟练度

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为37%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有34%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

摄影师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,呈现适度增长

预计"Photographers"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长3.9%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业,薪酬极低

在2023,'Photographers'的年度中位数工资为$40,760,或每小时$19。

' Photographers '的薪酬比全国中位工资低15.2%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,工作机会的适中范围。

截至2023,在美国有53,630人被雇佣为'Photographers'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每2 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Photographers”。

工作描述

拍摄人物、风景、商品或其他主题。可能使用照明设备来增强主题的外观。可能使用编辑软件来制作完成的图像和印刷品。包括商业和工业摄影师、科学摄影师和摄影记者。

SOC Code: 27-4021.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Hasan Tahsin Cinbaş (没有机会) 2 months ago
A photographer captures what they want to convey, and this varies according to their emotional state and mood. Just like a writer or painter, they transfer their feelings into the photograph, and this is also a form of emotional expression.
0 0 Reply
Laurentiu Juravle (低) 8 months ago
I think that photography is a mix of emotion, talent, and technique. Sure, a robot can make a picture as beautiful as mine, but it can't capture the precious moments like a photographer.
2 0 Reply
Owen (低) 1 year ago
Humans taking photographs of the world is a much more accurate and valuable approach rather than having AI generated images etc. It's more authentic
1 0 Reply
Tomeu Ozonas (极有可能) 1 year ago
Product CGI plus Generative AI will supply most photographic needs, such as home decor and food. Stock images will be absorbed and or replaced by Generative AI. Blockchain digital watermarks can help to save some traditional artistic and commercial photography.
0 0 Reply
Laurel 1 year ago
I'm a photographer, and the photography industry is doomed. AI image generation technology already exists, so all that has to happen is for it to become mainstream enough to be cheap to produce and add to most smartphones. Not only will the image quality be better, but it can also produce multiple images at once. In fact, AI images can even be copyrighted in some countries. The worst part is that since photographers are not paid much, there will not be much motivation to save the industry.
1 2 Reply
Tacio Philip 2 years ago
A lot of photographers' jobs can easily be replaced by automated drones and some AI to select frames from a high-definition video. There's no secret or creativity in many photography jobs (almost all social events, products...).

And yes, I'm a professional photographer, but as Galileo told us, we are not the center of the universe. :-P
1 1 Reply
jenna talia (极有可能) 2 years ago
drones. drones will fly around and take pictures
0 1 Reply
Jo (低) 2 years ago
I think that a robot could take a photo if it was trained to, but it could never see beauty or creativity like a human.

For example, a robot could take photos with the correct settings and a cool angle, but a robot could never look at something and realize the true beauty and emotions that a human could feel.

So, a robot might take a photo with the correct ISO, AP, SP, and an angle that it has been programmed to look at. But never emotions because in the end, it's a machine.
1 0 Reply
jagbar (极有可能) 3 years ago
Already happening with AI photos
1 0 Reply
Abby (没有机会) 3 years ago
Robots could not take over the personal touch and creative ideas photographers use in every single shot. There is not programing that could replace a person for this job.
0 0 Reply
isuzu222 3 years ago
The only reason this won't be replaced by robots is because the pay is so low there is no real reason to actively try to replace the profession. Also, this is easily a hobby profession/'freelancing' and will continue to have its niche just like we still have people using the Polaroids for fun.
0 1 Reply
Derek 1 year ago
Cashiers will be replaced and they are paid even less.
0 1 Reply
Ryan (极有可能) 4 years ago
Several forms of photography, particularly product photography, have already been largely automated with locations where you can bring your product, place it in a lightbox set, and AI assists the (non-photographer) customer in taking a series of professionally lit product shots. They're quite effective, will be easy to expand to new locations. Many of the techniques will eventually be possible to extend to portrait photography as well.

AI algorithms are already deeply progressed in combing through google street view to crop and process landscape and urban photography according to classical composition standards. At this point, the primary limiting factor is the sample quality, but much of the principles used will be possible to extend to drones surveying scenic areas.

While the small field of fine art photography will likely be unaffected, the majority of commercial or stock applications of photography are very likely to be done "well enough" by automatization to satisfy the primary customers of the field.
0 0 Reply
Celso Ribeiro (低) 5 years ago
Atividade que envolve dinâmica com grande variação que não se prevê..e o fator determinante que o robô (IA) não vai atingir...a Sensibilidade Humana.
0 0 Reply
xenon2 (适度) 5 years ago
AI can measure photo quality and take "infinite" number of photos, then based on selection will select best shots.
Imagine ball with lenses floating around, then from 100k pictures 100 is selected, based on "rememberability" and other defined patterns trained from famous photographers.
0 0 Reply
Suffyim 2 years ago
I think one reason photography will not be entirely automated is because robots can't exactly be inspired by anything.

From the little experience I have, I know it takes more than being knowledgeable and aware of the techniques of photography to take a good photo. Sure, it plays a role, but you need to feel emotion from the image to know that it is a good photo.

An AI can't do that.
0 0 Reply
E 5 years ago
I think e-commerce photography that is very technical could be replaced by robots but from my experience, I think it very unlikely and hard to imagine that robots will do better than agency talents for editorial/creative photography
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。