概述
自动化风险
2. 用户投票
3. 增长
工资
5. 体积
描述
资源
评论

数学家

低风险
25%
您接下来想去哪里？
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (22)
或者，更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
28%
(低风险)
投票
21%
(低风险)
Average: 25%
劳动力需求
增长
3.7%
到2033年
工资
$116,440
或每小时 $55.98
体积
2,220
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
7.0/10

人们还浏览了

计算机程序员
律师
网页开发者
机械工程师
物理学家

计算自动化风险

28% (低风险)

低风险（21-40%）：这个级别的工作面临的自动化风险较低，因为它们需要技术和以人为中心的技能的混合。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为21%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有28%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

数学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Mathematicians"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长3.7%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬非常高。

在2023，'Mathematicians'的年度中位数工资为$116,440，或每小时$55。

'Mathematicians'的薪资比全国中位工资高142.3%，全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，显著较低的就业机会范围。

截至2023，在美国有2,220人被雇佣为'Mathematicians'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说，大约每68 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Mathematicians”。

工作描述

在基础数学或将数学技术应用于科学，管理和其他领域的研究中进行研究。使用数学方法解决各种领域的问题。

SOC Code: 15-2021.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Guest 4 months ago
Aaaand Google DeepMind invented AI (AlphaGeometry 2 and AlphaProof) that solves IMO on silver medal. That escalated quickly...
1 1 Reply
Kevin Gonzalez Gordillo 4 months ago
Lately, I have been studying Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, and I was thinking, could an AI, or even an AGI, discover that in a consistent system of arithmetic, there are true statements that cannot be proven (incomplete system)? I mean the level of self-awareness and nuance that it would take to discover such a theorem and prove it true would be astounding since not even the best mathematicians of Gödel's times were convinced that was the case. So at this level of logic, I would really doubt an AI would take the jobs of people responsible for opening the heart of mathematics and showing the gaping hole of its fundamental flaw; for any mathematician reading this: Let's keep proving the true, the false, and the unprovable truths, and let's "embrace the unknown at the heart of any quest for truth" -(TED-Ed).
1 0 Reply
papo (没有机会) 5 months ago
Mathematics is a science that is still in discovery, AI will not be able to understand this context
0 0 Reply
skyss0fly (适度) 7 months ago
Robots have to utilise logic in their programming using arithmetic skills and therefore use mathematics to perform tasks and as such can compute mathematical tasks quite easily
0 0 Reply
Chickenlover69 4 months ago
Being a mathematician is researching math itself, like science. It needs creativity and human intelligence. For example, I certainly don't think AI can discover or invent complex numbers such as i, i = sqrt(-1). But I think you misunderstood the job of a mathematician as you probably thought that they just solve regular math questions that we already know how to solve, no it's not. Math is part of science and will always will be. Science will never be able to be taken over by AI. Remember that.
0 0 Reply
Anon (不确定) 11 months ago
Logic can be programmed, so they may be able to eventually prove theorems
0 0 Reply
Europe2048 (适度) 1 year ago
Maybe WolframAlpha is taking over?
0 0 Reply
Me (没有机会) 1 year ago
Mathematical insights rely on human originality.
0 0 Reply
Anish (极有可能) 1 year ago
It will simply outclass us in every field.
0 0 Reply
Probabilist 1 year ago
Mathematicians generally find new ideas to solve problems, they also find new questions, whereas AI is just able to copy what already exists and to adapt it to classical situations. But maybe mathematicians will be able to create themself a new AI which will be able to replace them !!
0 0 Reply
Andre (极有可能) 1 year ago
People saying this is unlikely are silly. The progress in the field of computer generated proofs has been faster than the progress in AI art. I don't expect any of the Millennium Prize problems to be solved by humans, and I expect them all solved by 2030.
0 0 Reply
Jason 4 months ago
I find it equally silly when you say that none of the Millennium Prize problems will be solved by Humans and all of them will be solved by 2030 (I consider myself an amateur mathematician at best, but from what I understand, the Poincare conjecture has been solved, and the solver, Grigori Perelman I think he's human?) I've hanged out in some mathematics communities and from what I've seen ai has proved some competitive math questions, I guess the four color theorem requires computer assistance, and I've seen Terrence Tao say that Ai could be used to help give Ideas to mathematicians? I've tried searching up ai replacing mathematicians and i only get results of lean which from what i know really only checks if a theorem is right or not. Overall I find the statement that Ai will complete all of the Millennium problems by 2030 to be ridiculous Ai does not seem to be anywhere close to proving some of the most fundamental century old problems in essentially 6 years
2 0 Reply
Carlos (没有机会) 2 years ago
I believe that even general AI will require a lot of time to reach a level where it can be compared on a full basis to a human in regards to maths.
0 0 Reply
Saurabh Sarkar (没有机会) 3 years ago
AI was created from Math. Its development is dependent on the development of new Math. It will be next to impossible for AI to develop new functional math.
0 0 Reply
James (不确定) 3 years ago
Because, AI and supercomputer can overtake the common knowledge
0 0 Reply
Jo 3 years ago
If you've ever done college level math and the number of ways you've been told to "Do it by inspection" and the unconventional method that every solution takes, Math is very unlikely to become automated.
0 0 Reply
AK (没有机会) 3 years ago
Mathematics can go so far, there are literally so infinite possibilities. That may sound extreme but there are so many number systems out there that mathematicians are uncovering everyday as a team and they still can not find all of them. A computer may be faster but since there are so many possibilities both mathematicians and computers must work TOGETHER.
0 0 Reply
Alex (低) 3 years ago
Mathematics requires quite a bit of creativity, which AI is not capable of.
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al-Zharani 4 years ago
Mathematicians being replaced by AI technology is not a bad idea. But this still upsets some people. Like me yes I'm a little upset but I don't I'll be thinking about creating jobs for mathematicians that hasn't bee in the (mathematics society) something like a direct career path for full time mathematicians. If is that secondary school teaching alright but not other job opportunities provided for mathematicians. I'm still thinking about the medicine field & how are experts in the field medicine are going to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) & also occupations like engineers or scientists.
0 0 Reply
Mon 2 years ago
Which career is most persistent to be replaced by AI according to you?
0 0 Reply
kevin (低) 5 years ago
Mathematics at its core requires a lot of creativity, something which AI is as of yet not good at. However AI will of course play a big role in defining potential research and we already see AI being used to find interesting mathematical patterns that we as humans have overlooked. It will be an aid to us, at least for the short/medium term.
0 0 Reply
seojin (没有机会) 5 years ago
well at first you need creativity to think about what should he do,
and AI does not have creativity!
so AI could be assistant not mathematicians.
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。