管理员和清洁工，除了女佣和家政清洁工
人们还浏览了
计算自动化风险
高风险（61-80%）：这个类别的工作面临着来自自动化的重大威胁，因为他们的许多任务可以使用当前或近期的技术轻松自动化。
有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。
用户投票
我们的访客投票表示，他们不确定这个职业是否会被自动化。 然而，我们生成的自动化风险等级表明自动化的可能性要高得多：有76%的机会会被自动化。
你认为自动化的风险是什么？
管理员和清洁工，除了女佣和家政清洁工在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？
情感
以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了情感趋势的重要指示。
随着时间（每年）的情绪变化
增长
预计"Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长3.1%
总就业人数和预计的职位空缺
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.
工资
在2023，'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners'的年度中位数工资为$35,020，或每小时$16。
' Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners '的薪酬比全国中位工资低27.1%，全国中位工资为$48,060。
随着时间推移的工资
体积
截至2023，在美国有2,172,500人被雇佣为'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners'。
这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约1.4%
换句话说，大约每69人中就有1人被雇佣为“Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners”。
工作描述
保持建筑物清洁和整洁。执行重型清洁工作，如清洁地板，洗涤地毯，清洗墙壁和玻璃，以及清除垃圾。职责可能包括照料炉子和锅炉，执行常规维护活动，通知管理层需要进行修理，以及清除人行道上的雪或碎片。
SOC Code: 37-2011.00
资源
如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。
评论
Leave a comment
Don't get me wrong, i think it could be done, i just think the cost would be outrageous and that somebody would still often have to step in for unusual messes and vandalism.
A. Invest significantly in equipment and processes that make the tasks much easier to do, and
B. Put a lot of personal responsibility on the people causing messes, generating the trash, and otherwise making the work that is needed to be done.
For A, restrooms would have to be redesigned with standards for toilets, urinals, sinks, etc where automated brushes could easily reach them. Trash receptacles would also need regular emptying and cleaning. It could be done, and I believe they've even invented self-cleaning restrooms where it basically treats the entire interior like a dishwasher, locking it off and doing high pressure sprays with sanitizing chemicals. It would be very very expensive to redesign them in such a way, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such precision equipment. Similar with locker/shower rooms, kitchenettes, and break areas.
For B, in order for desk waste receptacle collection to be automated, office workers would need to actually throw trash inside the trash can and not beside, behind, or underneath. They would need to have it in a fixed position, and keep the area in front of it clear, and not obstructed with personal items, stacks of paper, or other junk. Similar to automated vacuum robots, they would need the area they're to clean free of obstacles. The best way to clean greasy fingerprints off glass doors is simply not have them there in the first place; train people to put their hands on the handle. Office workers in particular are incredibly inconsiderate of the work they leave for others, and office facilities would rather hire double the amount of cleaning staff to be demeaned and jump through ridiculous and unnecessary hoops.
The amount of investment needed to automate janitorial tasks would be incredibly high. If they really wanted to save money, they could instantly probably cut 25-50% of their workforce budget by being considerate to others. But they'd much rather waste money on digging their heels into classism, ensuring there are "servants" to look down upon.
I am currently writing this comment using an artificial intelligence aid. It is called Grammarly. I write rather well on my own, the help though is appreciated. It can improvise upon what I'm going to write.
Does this mean it reads my mind? No, it uses algorithms to prognosticate what is coming based upon my previous writing. From that, it can then access other algorithms that study grammatical rules and policies. That allows it to use an algorithm to assist my writing by editing.
My point being case variables in programmatic instructions can be defined so as to "follow" and "cope" with people. I work as a custodian presently for our county's public schools, which we have from pre-school to grade twelve. Children are the most unpredictable of all humans.
I can easily see how timing schedules, sensors, algorithms could all be put in place to cut my workload by two-thirds, or more. My work can be greatly automated. Still, there would need to be technicians both to repair the physical and mechanical aspects and to repair the computing code at times. So I say it could go either way.
关于这个职业请留下您的评论