信息安全分析师

中等风险
51%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (14)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
58%
(中等风险)
投票
45%
(中等风险)
Average: 51%
劳动力需求
增长
32.7%
到2033年
工资
$120,360
或每小时 $57.86
体积
175,350
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
6.8/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

58% (中等风险)

中等风险(41-60%):中等风险的职业通常涉及常规任务,但仍需要一些人类的判断和交互。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为45%

我们的访客投票表示,他们不确定这个职业是否会被自动化。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有58%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

信息安全分析师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,非常快速的增长。

预计"Information Security Analysts"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长32.7%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业,薪酬非常高

在2023,'Information Security Analysts'的年度中位数工资为$120,360,或每小时$57。

'Information Security Analysts'的薪资比全国中位工资高150.4%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,更大的就业机会范围

截至2023,在美国有175,350人被雇佣为'Information Security Analysts'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.12%

换句话说,大约每866人中就有1人被雇佣为“Information Security Analysts”。

工作描述

计划,实施,升级或监控用于保护计算机网络和信息的安全措施。评估系统的安全漏洞,提出并实施风险缓解策略。可能会确保适当的安全控制措施到位,以保护数字文件和重要的电子基础设施。可能会对计算机安全漏洞和病毒进行应对。

SOC Code: 15-1212.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Musaa (不确定) 21 days ago
As the nature of cybersecurity still requires a human keen eye and problem solving skills with some creativity, which are beyond what a machine can do right now, it's uncertain that machines will take the job of an information security analyst, as it covers many aspects.
0 0 Reply
Arjun Mepa (适度) 1 year ago
The main reason for a SOC analyst or information security analyst role will be automated is because of alert fatigue. The current model responding doesn't work anymore especially when you have thousands of alerts to deal with. No one has the time threat detection rules to for each event or a malicious event. ML will either aim to replace or optimize this.
2 0 Reply
Meh 1 year ago
Once "ai" models are implemented with a dash of agency/cognitive architecture to find novel vulnerabilities and models are implemented to fix those vulnerabilities in tandem, finding exploitable bugs will become increasingly difficult with little ROI for the pentesters, hunters, whatever.

It'll be a race between red and blue team businesses to implement increasingly better models. Social engineering sure, but meh honestly. Will you be able to find incredibly difficult scraps or oversights the model missed? Will it be worth the risk and investment of the pentester? Overall bleak outlook.
0 0 Reply
Old Spice (没有机会) 1 year ago
You can't trust AI to protect your networks, it will probably be able to get manipulated by hackers in the future.
0 0 Reply
Anon 1 year ago
In the Cyber Threat Intelligence circles automation is already occuring. My job is being replaced by automated scripts that create and generate documentation and use APIs to scrape the data. most of it will be junk and not targeted the same way as a human but hey that's what the company is doing oh and they are asking me to work with the programmer who is literally making me firable. So angry. Would avoid this role if possible.
1 0 Reply
Jack (低) 2 years ago
Social engineering risks are highly unlikely to be detected by AI.
0 0 Reply
James (低) 2 years ago
Unlikely. Security analysis often have to think outside the box to find novel vulnerabilities.
0 0 Reply
Richard P (适度) 3 years ago
Could be disrupted by Quantum computers
0 0 Reply
Tom 12 months ago
QC could disrupt a lot or not much. Too early to really say for sure.
0 0 Reply
FD 3 years ago
New regulations will force the software developing companies to create less vulnerabilities in products (at the source.) Hardware vendors will similarly have to sell networked devices with secure settings programmed in by default.

This will increase the ability of automated systems to detect any remaining vulnerabilities, but will not completely remove the need for technicians to maintain, remediate, and upgrade the systems. There will still be a need to touch the hardware. Depending on individual situation, some companies will use more of AI tech than the others. We can already see something similar in the engineering, accounting, and law practice, where paralegals and drafters have not been completely replaced by software. Sole practitioners might use automation more extensively than the large corporations, but there will be a legal requirement for a human audit.

In addition, location-independent digital nomads who train themselves to use the automation tools could do a lot of accurate work in a short amount of time, as independent consultants and freelancers, and do business with multiple clients.

Making the choice to transition from repetitive and tedious manual work to automation, will be akin to transitioning from flintstones to nuclear power. Nuclear power still needs humans, and so will information security solutions.
0 0 Reply
Anderson Test 10 months ago
Fred should be worried
0 0 Reply
Fakiha (低) 4 years ago
I believe that is is less likely because mostly automatically finding vulnerabilities may be performed by AI but it will be the security analyst to enable computer do it, help it learn by giving feedback, as the result may not always be right. AI will help make task easier and fast for security analyst
0 0 Reply
Michael (低) 4 years ago
there are some areas such as malware detection and IPS , IDS that will be fully automated , but others like policy and social engineering are very hard to .
0 0 Reply
frankie (极有可能) 4 years ago
Automated penetration testing
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。