普通内科医师

最小风险
16%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (8)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
0.0%
(最小风险)
投票
32%
(低风险)
Average: 16%
劳动力需求
增长
3.4%
到2033年
工资
$223,310
或每小时 $107.35
体积
67,210
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
7.5/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

0.0% (最小风险)

最小风险(0-20%):这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低,因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力,创造力,强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调,使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化:

  • 帮助和照顾他人

  • 社会洞察力

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 说服

  • 谈判

  • 原创性

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为32%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有0.0%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

普通内科医师在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,呈现适度增长

预计"General Internal Medicine Physicians"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长3.4%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业,薪酬非常高

在2023,'General Internal Medicine Physicians'的年度中位数工资为$223,310,或每小时$107。

'General Internal Medicine Physicians'的薪资比全国中位工资高364.6%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,工作机会的适中范围。

截至2023,在美国有67,210人被雇佣为'General Internal Medicine Physicians'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约< 0.001%

换句话说,大约每2 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“General Internal Medicine Physicians”。

工作描述

诊断并提供各种内脏系统疾病和损伤的非手术治疗。主要为成人和青少年提供护理,并主要在门诊护理环境中工作。

SOC Code: 29-1216.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Kat (没有机会) 2 months ago
I wouldn’t trust a robot with my medical care. One error and I’m dead.
0 0 Reply
Aditya (适度) 3 months ago
Lots of diagnoses are done by tests and investigations and can be increasingly managed by a single person.
0 0 Reply
Wael 1 year ago
it's human life on the edge not a reversible programing errors so we need a DOCTOR decisions in these cases
0 0 Reply
Luxy John 1 year ago
AI replacing doctor: Risk Low
AI replacing a huge number of doctors: High
AI automating jobs of many doctors : HIGH

So what do doctors do that AI can do ?
1. type up clinic letters by dictation or typing themselves: EASILY AUTOMATED
2. prescribing standard medications for a disease ONCE DIAGNOSED: easy to automate
3. referring to other specialities / involving other specialties if test results abnormal: EASILY AUTOMATED
4. have frequent tea coffee breaks and date lovely nurses: difficult to automate.......
5. DIAGNOSE ILLNESS......if a monkey can put all the data into the computer by talking to a patient, then the AI will outperform the doctor and suggest the TOP THREE BEST POSSIBILE/ LIKELY diagnosis... IT CAN PRINT OUT blood requests and scans for all those diseases instantly and forward it to all departments. ... and once the data comes back the final diagnosis can be confirmed....

BUT TAKING ONE LOOK AT A PATIENT AND SAYING YOU ARE OK, you can go home, no medications needed....NO WAY YOU CAN AUTOMATE THAT.....everyone and everything that walks will be taken blood out of and scanned to death ... life will become slowed down by all the testing.. but hey, the tests will be faster right? we will have more CT scans and MRIs or even better scanners for everyone at their own home right? well if so, yes, doctors will have to be renamed to HEALTH AI MANAGERS
1 0 Reply
wolf 1 year ago
The social aspects of this job make it safe
0 0 Reply
Barez (极有可能) 2 years ago
Because robots can't distinguish lies from people who pretend to have a disease, it becomes crucial. The type of lie that the patient themselves believe to be true is the most important thing for human intelligence to recognize.
0 0 Reply
A coder from Google (极有可能) 2 years ago
I don't know who's answering these polls...

We literally have so many AI databases that can help identify illnesses from symptoms and biostatistics. It's a project that's being worked on by many tech companies. Even doctors are already using this.

There exist remote surgeon robots that allow surgeons to perform surgery without being physically present. The only reason there's a human there is because we are too afraid of AI decision-making for liability issues.

There's no technical barrier to a fully automated single-purpose AI replacing specialist doctors slowly.
1 3 Reply
T (没有机会) 2 years ago
Robots cant think like humans
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。