概述

自动化风险

2. 用户投票

3. 增长

工资

5. 体积

描述

资源

消防员

自动化风险

计算出的

0.0%

风险等级

投票

24%

根据 421 票的投票结果

劳动力需求

增长

4.3%

到2032年

工资

$51,680

或每小时 $24.84

体积

321,450

截至 2022

摘要

工作评分

7.1/10

想在您的网站上显示这个摘要吗？嵌入代码：

投票

Analysis

自动化风险

0.0% (最小风险)

最小风险（0-20%）：这一类别的职业被自动化的可能性较低，因为它们通常需要复杂的问题解决能力，创造力，强大的人际交往能力和高度的手动灵巧。这些工作通常涉及复杂的手部动作和精确的协调，使得机器难以复制所需的任务。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些非常重要的品质很难实现自动化：

帮助和照顾他人

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化：

狭窄的工作空间，尴尬的姿势
手工熟练度
社会洞察力
手指灵巧

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内，实现全自动化的可能性为24%。

我们的访客投票表示，这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持，该等级预计有0.0%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么？

消防员在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大？

极有可能
适度
不确定
低
没有机会

情感

以下图表会在有大量投票数据可以呈现有意义的数据时包含在内。这些视觉表示显示了用户投票结果随时间的变化，提供了对情绪趋势的重要指示。

随着时间（每年）的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业，呈现适度增长。

预计"Firefighters"的工作空缺数量将在2032内增长4.3%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据，该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2023到期.

工资

相对于其他职业，薪酬适中

在2022，'Firefighters'的年度中位数工资为$51,680，或每小时$24。

'Firefighters'的薪资比全国中位工资高11.6%，全国中位工资为$46,310。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比，明显更多的工作机会范围。

截至2022，在美国有321,450人被雇佣为'Firefighters'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.22%

换句话说，大约每460人中就有1人被雇佣为“Firefighters”。

工作描述

控制和扑灭火灾，或在生命、财产或环境处于危险的紧急情况下进行应对。职责可能包括火灾预防、紧急医疗服务、危险物质应对、搜救以及灾害援助。

SOC Code: 33-2011.00

资源

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯，或者想要换工作，我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具，它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

留下评论

Idk (没有机会)说

I think that is impossible the robots become firefighetrs, they combat fires, that can burn robots systems

May 01, 2023 at 06:00 下午

Will (没有机会)说

As a first responder who has responded to some absolutely weird and unexpected calls I can’t imagine making a robot capable of adapting to the unknown in the same ways a human can. Not in 20 years anyway; no chance.

Apr 13, 2023 at 05:14 下午

Daniel (没有机会)说

Too much adaptation to very diverse environments.

Nov 01, 2022 at 06:10 上午

Lee Edwards Wright (极有可能)说

One of the main points of using robots is to do something that isn't safe, robots fighting fire would be highly likely because it's a dangerous job as we all know. Robots would be fearless... quite literally and might have more strength.

Sep 30, 2022 at 12:26 下午

Enzo (没有机会)说

I believe that although automated fire prevention systems will help to reduce the need significantly, the environment in a fire is too hostile and changes too quickly for a robot to be able to completely replace humans.

Apr 20, 2022 at 02:09 下午

V (没有机会)说

In the next 20 years, there is no chance of technology advancing enough to completely replace firefighters maybe supplement like some departments are using UAVs now but in the next 20 years expect a robot to perform the complex tasks required by firefighting in changing environments that are structurally degraded and in which visibility will be significantly degraded isn't realistic in any way. In 50-100 years... maybe but predicting that far ahead is essentially useless. Who knows what crazy technology we'll have by then.

Oct 13, 2021 at 12:40 上午

Alvin (不确定)说

As someone who works in the field of machine learning, I can tell you that firefighters absolutely can be replaced. Now whether or not the general population will be ok with their hero’s going away, that’s another question itself. But if people can come off their pedestal and realize the lives automating this progression would save, then yes, it’ll be automated.

Oct 11, 2021 at 07:11 上午

Will说

As a firefighter, I wonder if you’re basing your response on the extinguishment of fires only. Fighting fires is only about 10percent of a firefighters job. The bulk is Medical and Rescue. Creating a robot capable of adapting to the unknown in the same way a first responder is tasked to do is, I would imagine, not something we will be capable of in the near future.

Apr 13, 2023 at 05:11 下午

Rh (低)说

Replace firefighters altogether? Most likely not. However, we will definitely see technology and robots as more of an assistant to firefighters. At most, I think the robot would be good for the really hazardous tasks that would require you to be very close to said fire almost to the point of being burned. Everything else is best done by a human.

Sep 30, 2021 at 04:20 上午

Josef (适度)说

Couldn't we make machines to hose down fires automatically? It doesn't seem that unlikely

Apr 09, 2021 at 10:50 上午

Will说

Remember: Fighting fire is a very small part of firefighting.

Apr 13, 2023 at 05:15 下午

Oscar说

a firefighter not only fight the fire ... try to learn a robot traffic rescue. More robots helping the firefighters? ... yes, but no way to replace.

Mar 08, 2021 at 11:21 上午

Drake (没有机会)说

It's 2020 and if we haven't been automated yet what makes you think we ever will?

Dec 03, 2020 at 11:05 下午

Kyle (极有可能)说

Improvements in automatic sprinklers and fire suppression systems will replace the need for the fire fighting aspect of the job.

Mar 26, 2020 at 07:50 下午

yeah说

yeah so lets get rid of firefighters altogether, nothing can go wrong can it?

Oct 30, 2020 at 12:14 上午

Firefighter manager说

Wake up and smell the coffee technology is already impacting on the job ever heard of Boston Robotics https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=boston+robotics+youtube&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-gb&client=safari

Mar 09, 2020 at 06:44 下午

Jack说

I image humans being fire fighters forever, because the robots may be on fire...

Mar 08, 2020 at 10:26 上午

Kevin (极有可能)说

I think that AI should take over this job, because it is dangerous.

Jan 31, 2020 at 11:03 下午

Nguyen (没有机会)说

There's not way a robot can preform the Heimlich manoeuvre on someone

Jan 28, 2020 at 04:22 上午

An Actual Firefighter说

If you think this will happen you’re f**king stupid.

Oct 18, 2019 at 12:32 上午

Em (没有机会)说

You can't send a robot into a flaming building and expect it to adapt to its surroundings.

Oct 03, 2019 at 03:37 下午

Cdd说

For real, like it's stupid people think robots can actually do that, like???

Apr 17, 2024 at 03:18 下午

Alvaro说

I can´t disagree more with this. Robots can be fireproof and humans are very affected by fire.

May 09, 2019 at 12:01 下午

Alvarado说

Problem I see with automation, still would be fun to attempt. Is that every building is different and the environment is changing, would also need to be able to feel and hear materials and their strengths. A lot of little details to automate, so extremely difficult. In terms of robots being physically more capable I'd say of course, but at same time likely heavier so would not work as well in a weaken building. But most likely I can see them being most useful being piloted remotely by firemen, and generally mostly when the environment is already rated as unpassable, so at the point where no firemen would enter the building anymore due to safety concerns. But in a potentially weakened building but safe enough to enter building, I could see humans having an advantage due to our lighter bodies.

Dec 18, 2019 at 02:37 上午

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。

人们还浏览了

律师

计算机程序员

警察和警长巡逻官员

学前教师，小学教师，初中教师，高中教师，特殊教育教师

演员