Författare och författare
Vill du ha denna sammanfattning på din webbplats? Bädda in kod:
Risk för automatisering
Måttlig risk (41-60%): Yrken med måttlig risk för automatisering involverar oftast rutinmässiga uppgifter men kräver fortfarande en viss mänsklig bedömning och interaktion.
Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.
Impact of Chat GPT on this occupation
We've received many comments and emails about Chat GPT and it's impact on this occupation. It's very impressive software, so people are understandably worried and/or excited.
However, something important to note with regards to the score we've calculated here, is that this occupation is comprised of many different types of job roles. Some examples of these include Advertising Writer, Blurb Writer, Copywriter and Screenwriter.
Some roles/tasks are more susceptible than other's to being automated by Chat GPT, but the score we've calculated is one that's an amalgamation of all of them.
Unfortunately, the source for our data (o*net) doesn't split this category up to the individual roles, so we can't calculate a score for each of them. If they do at some point in the future, we'll do the same, and generate scores accordingly.
Writing occupations aren't dead, but they are changing, so the best advice we can offer is to keep up to date with the latest developments, and use the tools available to your advantage.
Användarundersökning
Våra besökare har röstat att det är en låg chans att detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Detta bedömning stöds ytterligare av den beräknade automationsrisknivån, som uppskattar 49% chans för automation.
Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?
Vad är sannolikheten att Författare och författare kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?
Känsla
Följande diagram inkluderas överallt där det finns ett betydande antal röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användarundersökningars resultat över tid, vilket ger en betydande indikation på sentimenttrender.
Känsla över tid (kvartalsvis)
Känslor över tid (årligen)
Tillväxt
Antalet 'Writers and Authors' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 4,1% till 2032
Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2023.
Löner
I 2022 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Writers and Authors' 73.150 $, eller 35 $ per timme.
'Writers and Authors' betalades 58,0% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 46.310 $
Löner över tid
Volym
Från och med 2022 var det 54 010 personer anställda som 'Writers and Authors' inom USA.
Detta representerar cirka < 0,001% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet
Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 2 tusen personer är anställda som 'Writers and Authors'.
Arbetsbeskrivning
Utforma och förbered skriftligt material, såsom manus, berättelser, annonser och annat material.
SOC Code: 27-3043.00
Resurser
Will Chat GPT spell the end of blogging?
Here's a very informative video from Ricky Kesler from Income School about Chat GPT as it relates to blogging (and SEO). We think it contains great advice, and can be applied to all sorts of writing job roles, not just bloggers.
Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.
Personer tittade också på
Kommentarer
Lämna en kommentar
Personally, I would hate to see the art of storytelling to be turned over to machines.
ChatGPT is not going to write things that people care about. This isn't because chatgpt is a bad writer - it's because people primarily consume written content because of the person behind it. Since the dawn of the internet, and even before, there have been an infinite number of takes, a vast supply of content. Yet, somehow, people still pay for newspapers, and substacks, and books, and all sorts of things that are seemingly available for free with just a Google search. It's because of the particulars of that person's perspective, not just "story good" or "take good."
There are already far more failed writers than successful ones, and far more failed "in the style of" works than actual successful works. What AI will do is simply raise the stakes for what it takes to be a successful writer or author, since it establishes a baseline commodity. However, that baseline is already very, very high.
it's not gonna replace real writers yet but it is coming like winter.
Humans are still the best storytellers.
Personally I went into this field because I absolutely thought I could write better than the average book, and that the "cream will rise to the top". I still believe this is true.
Where I get worried is if AI can learn to write fiction really well. Can an AI in 10 years learn beyond what it is taught (fed average books) and create amazing stories? That's what really scares me.
Will people want to read a story written by an AI or will people want to read stories written by humans? There's an element of detachment when reading AI writing and the uncanny valley effect might take hold when we read an AI trying to present human emotions through character. We will know - whoever put those words down did not understand them and they will have less meaning. Or will they? If they make sense they make sense. If it has emotional impact it has emotional impact - even if that was replicated through pulp learning and mastered through engagement scores.
Scary times to be a writer - to have any job. But this was always my dream and so I know deep down there's no chance I'll give up on it. Even if I can only build two thousand loyal readers, that is enough to make a living, and I'll do that through being very very human and marketing myself face first.
Lämna ett svar om detta yrke