Kirurger, alla andra

0,0% (Minimal risk)

Minimal risk (0-20%): Yrken i denna kategori har en låg sannolikhet att automatiseras, eftersom de vanligtvis kräver komplex problemlösning, kreativitet, starka mellanmänskliga färdigheter och en hög grad av manuell skicklighet. Dessa jobb involverar ofta komplexa handrörelser och exakt koordination, vilket gör det svårt för maskiner att replikera de nödvändiga uppgifterna.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Användarundersökning

Känsla

Följande graf inkluderas där det finns en betydande mängd röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en viktig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Kommentarer

Leave a comment

CAROLINE (Måttlig) 3 months ago

Because you see AI is developing .There are already technology that helps with surgery so that may DEVELOPE.

0 1 Reply

chat we're so cooked 6 months ago

I've read through the comments, and most people say that "AI will cause accidents and fatalities" without considering how a single hand twitch could end your life. Machine error happens less than human error, after all.

Also, surgeons don't require the same empathy factor as something like psychologists. The 0% replacement rate seems absurd, considering how much AI will advance in the next twenty years. Surgeons may be the ones to operate and give instructions to the machines, but this job (like basically every other job under the sun) will be hit hard by AI.

9 9 Reply

Balaj (Låg) 6 months ago

Nobody would want a robot to perform a surgery on them

4 7 Reply

TECHNOBLADE NEVER DIES (Måttlig) 6 months ago

robots are already helping, and eventually they may be able to do surgeries by themselves, but somebody has to control the robots too

2 1 Reply

Economist (Mycket troligt) 6 months ago

Incentive to replace highest paid employees with upfront investment combined with low maintenance costs - economic incentive will outweigh liability risk as technologies and data sets advance

0 0 Reply

m (Mycket troligt) 7 months ago

It is highly likely. Many robotic technologies are now being used in operations. A surgeon will only be controlling the robot, and afterward, in about 20 years, will be independently automated.

0 0 Reply

NAZLY GARCÉS MURILLO (Ingen chans) 7 months ago

Because I believe that surgeons will be the ones operating the machines, given that these machines cannot take control of themselves and generate real and healthy results for the patients.

0 1 Reply

Jabobski (Ingen chans) 8 months ago

Accidents in programing could cause fatal damage and lots of deaths

0 0 Reply

Jimmy (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

because robots are most likely to make mistakes and kill people

0 0 Reply

Dr Suggon Deeznots 28 days ago

no robot surgeon has ever killed a person, but doctors make mistakes all the time. you nincompoop

2 0 Reply

atharv 8 days ago

i agree

0 0 Reply

Hamood (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

Too complicated to make a robot that can do many surgeries. Too risky to put a robot in healthcare.

0 0 Reply

Malala (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

Too many regulations in the medical industry

0 0 Reply

Playmylevel (Mycket troligt) 1 year ago

There are already robots that have been developed for surgery, and using robots instead of humans can allow for way more precision

2 1 Reply

Jabobski Mahomi Skibidias Rizzi Misimgablo 8 months ago

depends what type of surgery the robot will be performing

0 0 Reply

Andrew (Ingen chans) 1 year ago

You need the interaction between the doctor and patient to read the body language and emphasise with him and have a perception about the pain

0 0 Reply

Anonymous 2 years ago

Surgeons won't be automated for a long time. Also, do you really think people would trust a robot? I sure wouldn't. All it takes is one malfunction or software error and you're finished.

2 0 Reply

MJ 12 months ago

I mean, all it takes is one slip of the hand for you to be finished as well. In the future, I don't see why AI would be less accurate than humans, as they don't have to account for human error. Surgery having a 0% automation risk is ludicrous. Of course you wouldn't trust it right now since AI is still in it's infancy age, but it will get far better than we could possibly imagine.

2 0 Reply

Elon Musk 1 year ago

well, do you think humans don't have errors and make mistakes? Do you even understand how AI and robotics work? Doesn't sound like it.

0 0 Reply

000 8 months ago

But like, aren't surgeons highly trained for like eight years or more or something? They are way more reliable than a robot swinging around in your open chest. I don't think you understand how skilled surgeons really are.

1 1 Reply

Alexandra (Mycket troligt) 2 years ago

We already have startups like Star, which want to automate and democratize surgeries. Even though we aren't there yet, I think that automated surgery can increase surgery quality while driving down prices.

1 1 Reply

Karl 1 year ago

I wouldn't lend much credence to that. Even if automated surgery were an option it would still require extensive supervision from actual surgeons. Surgeries are volatile endeavors involving volatile individuals. Possibilities that robots alone won't be able to account for at least for decades to come.

1 0 Reply