Specialeffektskonstnärer och Animatörer

Hög Risk
64%
Vart vill du åka härnäst?
Dela dina resultat med vänner och familj.
Eller, utforska detta yrke i större detalj...
RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
70%
(Hög Risk)
UNDERSÖKNING
58%
(Måttlig Risk)
Average: 64%
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
4,3%
från år 2033
LÖNER
99 060 $
eller 47,62 $ per timme
Volym
29 940
från och med 2023
SAMMANFATTNING
JOBBPOÄNG
4,6/10

Personer tittade också på

Beräknad automatiseringsrisk

70% (Hög Risk)

Hög risk (61-80%): Jobb i denna kategori står inför ett betydande hot från automatisering, eftersom många av deras uppgifter lätt kan automatiseras med nuvarande eller nära framtida tekniker.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Originalitet

Användarundersökning

58% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att de är osäkra på om detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Emellertid tyder den automatiseringsrisknivå vi har genererat på en mycket högre chans för automatisering: 70% chans för automatisering.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Specialeffektskonstnärer och Animatörer kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?






Känsla

Följande graf inkluderas där det finns en betydande mängd röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en viktig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känsla över tid (kvartalsvis)

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Måttlig tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 4,3% till 2033

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2021 och 2031
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2024.

Löner

Mycket högt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' 99 060 $, eller 47 $ per timme.

'Special Effects Artists and Animators' betalades 106,1% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48 060 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Lägre utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2023 var det 29 940 personer anställda som 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka < 0,001% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 5 tusen personer är anställda som 'Special Effects Artists and Animators'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Skapa specialeffekter eller animationer med film, video, datorer eller andra elektroniska verktyg och medier för användning i produkter, såsom datorspel, filmer, musikvideor och reklamfilmer.

SOC Code: 27-1014.00

Resurser

Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Kommentarer

Leave a comment

Gojo 7 days ago
No chance, anime is way better and ai will never replace what we love
0 0 Reply
Awang razak (Osäker) 7 days ago
Ai generated videos were kinda bad and a person with mediocre movements and they lack the capacity developements hell nah just think about alan beckers developements for youtube animatings he did a good job on that imagine asking ai to make a stick figure how will do it? instead they draw a litteral stick and can they do tom and jerry? instead they draw a real human person named tom and jerry or could be a cat and a mouse it depends.
0 0 Reply
Ele (Low) 5 months ago
As an artist, I'd give some doubt to this because I've seen the ropes done behind animation. Sure, AI can recreate animation, but at the same time it will not hold a candle to the quality human-made animation has. The way it constantly shifts between several art styles because it farms stolen media it's been fed which leads to major inconsistencies. Much more, it's rather impossible to make an "original" animated short made entirely out of AI. Why? Consistency (and originality) are the reason. I find that AI "generalizes" images to be able to create an image, which is difficult especially when it comes to pushing facial expressions because AI needs to farm hundreds of images to "understand" how to recreate the image. I don't think it's possible in the long run either because at some point in time IF society and the industry as a whole decides to just USE AI for everything, there's gonna be a lot of "inbreeding" happening. AI will feed on other AI because there's not gonna be anymore human-made images it can freely farm off of which results to the most whacked quality you'd think of. AI will make the most general looking animation that can ever exist, but that thing will lack the soul, the humanity, human-made animations have.
12 0 Reply
Sundew (Måttlig) 5 months ago
Because a.i can already generate videos n stuff
0 5 Reply
August Nelson (Måttlig) 5 months ago
With all the art AIs we already have, it is inevitable.
0 4 Reply
human (Låg) 5 months ago
originality and high quality
4 1 Reply
Moss (Osäker) 6 months ago
Ai is smart, but also stupid. In time it could, but we dont know for sure.
1 3 Reply
bob (Måttlig) 6 months ago
ai is getting better at making automated vidseos
0 3 Reply
Aaron (Ingen chans) 6 months ago
This requires soul and robots can’t replicate the soul that humans produce. Bad or otherwise.
8 1 Reply
Aizen 6 months ago
I saw a lot of highly likely comments, so as an artist I thought I should give my point of view.
I don’t think ai can replace these types of jobs as if you wanted to actually make a movie or series, you would still need a good plot and a storyboard and color for at least one frame and for the ending and beginning scene or else how would you make a movie that follows the exact plot and looks that you want. (if your an in-between artists.. uhhhh-)
an example would be any ghibli film. even if ai were to create a movie and make it look exactly the same, it’s not as appealing because every ghibli film not only takes years to make but uses traditional animation and hand draw each frame and that’s what makes it appealing and different from other films not because an ai made it in just 5 seconds.
7 0 Reply
Ahmed (Mycket troligt) 6 months ago
Simply because of the hyper realistic AI that’s making these videos it’s becoming hard to tell what is real and what isn’t personally I think it’s going to be worse but it’s a high chance it may take over
0 4 Reply
Jason Chen (Mycket troligt) 6 months ago
sora ai and generative video models can have a text input create any video or film imagery now, hence no need for armies of humans creating these works of digital art.
0 4 Reply
P3S4NT (Mycket troligt) 6 months ago
ai art, it steals pieces of art without permission and merges them into something else.
1 3 Reply
Max Sky (Måttlig) 7 months ago
ai animation could become super avalible from OpenAI Sora, ngl its scary, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YEX4t79e0Q
0 3 Reply
no >:( (Låg) 8 months ago
copyright and laws and stuff
4 0 Reply
Max Sky 7 months ago
it could change in the future you never know.
0 4 Reply
Bryan (student) 8 months ago
With the amount of new technology and AI coming through the years, people may think about robotic replacement in the industry of artists/designers. I don’t completely agree with them (maybe because I do want to make it my job in the future) but there will always have a limit and as we all know, technology, AI, computer, programming, etc… are made by humans. For me, technology should assist humans, doing daily task for example. But not replace them. And as we all says, they don’t have the originality, creativity of human being.
1 0 Reply
Ro (Mycket troligt) 10 months ago
Sora AI
0 3 Reply
james adamson 11 months ago
Everyone here is looking at this from the perspective of a creative. I am also in that bucket, but when the bean counters see something cheaper and more efficient the little nuances and facets of human beauty and creativity will not be considered.
A powerful and forceful director/CEO/MD on board could swing that in human creativity's favour, but look at all the areas in production where the money goes for the lowest common denominator.
Art and money are not good bedfellows and AI art like plastic and industrial streamlining are where we are headed unfortunately.( IMHO.)While we got a bit cleverer at being efficient we will also get A LOT cheaper a lot saddder and A LOT more unpleasant on the eye!

From DaVinci to plastic impressions and AI interpretations of beauty.
I'm thinking of the film Brazil and a horrendous retail park I visited in LA! Gaudy gossip magazines cheap toy shops and the show Black Mirror!
0 0 Reply
armando camero 11 months ago
you'll be replaced by AI if the client is okay with 'good enough' . but you won't if the client needs minor detail adjustments and lots of precision and control
0 0 Reply
Navarone (Mycket troligt) 1 year ago
Im a 3D rigging artist with 5+ years in the industry and if things keep going the way they are, i think that by 2040, 3D art is going to be just a few directors and producers using AI instead of a pipeline.
Art is dead.
0 2 Reply

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke

Denna webbplats skyddas av reCAPTCHA och Googles sekretesspolicy och användarvillkor gäller.