Legitimerade praktiska sjuksköterskor och legitimerade yrkessjuksköterskor

RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
26%
risknivå
UNDERSÖKNING
26%
Baserat på 104 röster
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
6,3%
från år 2032
LÖNER
54.620 $
eller 26,26 $ per timme
Volym
632 020
från och med 2022
SAMMANFATTNING
JOBBPOÄNG
7,0/10

Vill du ha denna sammanfattning på din webbplats? Bädda in kod:

Risk för automatisering

26% (Låg risk)

Låg risk (21-40%): Jobb på denna nivå har en begränsad risk för automatisering, eftersom de kräver en blandning av tekniska och människocentrerade färdigheter.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa mycket viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Att hjälpa och ta hand om andra

  • Social Perceptiveness - Social Förståelse

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Fingerfärdighet

  • Manuell Fingerfärdighet

Användarundersökning

26% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att det är en låg chans att detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Detta bedömning stöds ytterligare av den beräknade automationsrisknivån, som uppskattar 26% chans för automation.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Legitimerade praktiska sjuksköterskor och legitimerade yrkessjuksköterskor kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?






Tillväxt

Snabb tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 6,3% till 2032

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2021 och 2031
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2023.

Löner

Måttligt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2022 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses' 54.620 $, eller 26 $ per timme.

'Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses' betalades 17,9% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 46.310 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Betydligt större utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2022 var det 632 020 personer anställda som 'Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka 0,43% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 233 personer är anställda som 'Licensed Practical and Licensed Vocational Nurses'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Omsorg för sjuka, skadade eller återhämtande patienter eller personer med funktionshinder på sjukhus, vårdhem, kliniker, privata hem, gruppbostäder och liknande institutioner. Kan arbeta under övervakning av en legitimerad sjuksköterska. Licens krävs.

SOC Code: 29-2061.00

Resurser

Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Kommentarer

Al (Ingen chans) säger
Honestly, this should be the same rating as Registered Nurse, which is very low or no chance at all. I work as a CNA (i.e., a Certified Nurse Assistant), and I will be going into nursing school to become an Licensed Vocational Nurse or LVN for short. With this in mind, I do not think it is the case that Artificial Intelligence, or AI, can replace LVNs at all, and if it does, it will do so in a limited fashion. I think this is so, based on my experience as a CNA. Since I am speaking anecdotally, please do not take my reasoning as infallible or conclusive. The LVNs I work with, and the job they work, require a great amount of humanised skill. This means that their work necessitates abilities and qualities unique to biological human beings. This is so, because many human beings possess natural particular capabilities that are either difficult for AI to replicate, or cannot possess at all. This does not mean that AI will never possess some abilities. This is the case, because one cannot, even with the greatest amount of abstract reasoning or empirical evidence, completely predict the future in full accuracy. At least not all the time. It could still very well be the case that AI may be able to replicate some humanised skills that they find difficult to replicate. I will exemplify my argument in the following paragraph.

As an example, take the humanised skill of empathy. Empathy is the emotional skill to understand and share the feelings of another person. This shared emotional connection is something many, if not all, patients crave and desire. Empathy is something that AI cannot replicate well. In order for empathy to occur between two individuals, both individuals must be capable of emotions. Humans are capable of emotions, but AI robots are not. Emotions are biological, chemical, and mental reactions to certain stimuli. These reactions are uniquely inherent to organic living biological beings. An AI robot is not an organic living being, and thus cannot produce emotions. The best an AI can do is be programmed in a way to say certain things when a patient exhibits particular facial responses or verbal/tonal nuances. However, there is more to empathy than just being responsive. There exists a shared feeling that a human can only feel with another human, or another animal, especially when one of those humans is in a medically ill or injurious state.

Critical thinking serves as another example of a humanised skill that AI will find difficult to replicate. Critical thinking is the intellectual act of considering certain concepts, and constructing a charitable and objective take on said concepts through abstract reasoning or empirical evidence. To further this, the more unique and nuanced those concepts are, the more difficult it will be to critically think about said concepts. In the healthcare settings that LVNs find themselves in, there exists many unique concepts, or in this case, situations. I will illuminate one and that would be the case of patients with severe dementia. Patients with this mental condition may showcase behaviour that includes, but not limited to, loud screaming, random crying and potential desires for killing. What to do with these kind of patients is something LVNs face on a daily basis. Should the LVN just ignore the patient? Doing so may endanger the patient to him or herself, or worse, endanger other patients situated in the same room. Ignoring patients is also considered abuse in healthcare settings. On the other hand, ignoring the patient may allow the LVN to give care to other patients with much more debilitating conditions in the meantime, and thus allowing the LVN efficient time management. The LVN can also attend to that patient first, but only to administer medication that will calm him down, and make the LVN’s work less difficult. This may prove detrimental, if a family member of another patient asked the LVN to administer medicine to him first, because he missed a dose earlier in the day. With all this in mind, one can see how as an LVN there are many factors that they have to consider when making a reasonable decision, such as proper ethics, personal feelings, logical order of work, and so on. The LVN must be able to evaluate these factors and utilise his intellectual capacity for reason to support making the right decision. An AI’s intellectual capacity is much more rigid than a human’s mind. An AI robot cannot improvise at any given moment in the same fashion as a human. Unique situations, such as the aforementioned dementia case, requires a mind being able to asses many nuanced factors unique to the situation. Unfortunately, AI is just not capable yet of such critical thinking.
Jan 27, 2024 at 04:55

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke

Denna webbplats skyddas av reCAPTCHA och Googles sekretesspolicy och användarvillkor gäller.

Personer tittade också på

Legitimerade sjuksköterskor
Datorprogrammerare
Advokater
Revisorer och revisorer
Förskollärare, Grundskollärare, Mellanstadielärare, Gymnasielärare och Speciallärare