Garçons e Garçonetes

Alto Risco
69%

Para Onde Você Gostaria de Ir a Seguir?

Compartilhe seus resultados com amigos e familiares.

Ou, explore esta profissão em maior detalhe...

RISCO DE AUTOMAÇÃO
CALCULADO
70%
(Alto Risco)
VOTAÇÃO
68%
(Alto Risco, Com base em 604 votos)
Average: 69%
DEMANDA DE TRABALHO
CRESCIMENTO
1,0%
pelo ano 2033
SALÁRIOS
$ 31.940
ou $ 15,35 por hora
Volume
2.237.850
a partir de 2023
RESUMO
O que este floco de neve mostra?
O Floco de Neve é um resumo visual das cinco insígnias: Risco de Automação (calculado), Risco (pesquisado), Crescimento, Salários e Volume. Ele oferece um instantâneo do perfil de uma ocupação. A cor do Floco de Neve está relacionada ao seu tamanho. Quanto melhor a ocupação pontua em relação às outras, maior e mais verde o Floco de Neve se torna.
PONTUAÇÃO DO TRABALHO
2,5/10
O que é isto?
Pontuação do Trabalho (quanto maior, melhor):

Nós classificamos os trabalhos usando quatro fatores. Estes são:

- Chance de ser automatizado
- Crescimento do trabalho
- Salários
- Volume de posições disponíveis

Estes são alguns pontos chave para pensar quando estiver procurando um emprego.

As pessoas também visualizaram

Advogados Programadores de Computador Atores Contabilistas e Auditores Pilotos Comerciais

Risco de automação calculado

70% (Alto Risco)

Alto Risco (61-80%): Empregos nesta categoria enfrentam uma ameaça significativa da automação, pois muitas de suas tarefas podem ser facilmente automatizadas usando tecnologias atuais ou de futuro próximo.

Mais informações sobre o que é essa pontuação e como ela é calculada estão disponíveis aqui.

Algumas qualidades bastante importantes do trabalho são difíceis de automatizar:

  • Percepção Social

  • Ajudando e Cuidando dos Outros

Enquete do usuário

68% chance de automação completa nas próximas duas décadas

Nossos visitantes votaram que é provável que esta ocupação seja automatizada. Esta avaliação é ainda mais apoiada pelo nível de risco de automação calculado, que estima 70% de chance de automação.

O que você acha que é o risco da automação?

Qual é a probabilidade de que Garçons e Garçonetes seja substituído por robôs ou inteligência artificial nos próximos 20 anos?

Sentimento

O gráfico a seguir é exibido onde há votos suficientes para produzir dados significativos. Ele mostra os resultados das enquetes dos usuários ao longo do tempo, fornecendo uma indicação clara das tendências de sentimento.

Sentimento ao longo do tempo (anualmente)

Crescimento

"Crescimento lento" em relação a outras profissões.

Espera-se que o número de vagas de emprego para 'Waiters and Waitresses' aumente 1,0% até 2033

Emprego total e estimativa de vagas de emprego

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho para o período entre 2023 e 2033
As projeções atualizadas são devidas 09-2025.

Salários

Muito mal remunerado em relação a outras profissões

Em 2023, o salário anual mediano para 'Waiters and Waitresses' foi de 31.940 $, ou 15 $ por hora

'Waiters and Waitresses' receberam 33,5% a menos que o salário médio nacional, que ficou em 48.060 $

Salários ao longo do tempo

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho

Volume

Alcance significativamente maior de oportunidades de emprego em comparação com outras profissões

A partir de 2023 havia 2.237.850 pessoas empregadas como 'Waiters and Waitresses' dentro dos Estados Unidos.

Isso representa cerca de 1,5% da força de trabalho empregada em todo o país

Dito de outra maneira, cerca de 1 em 67 pessoas são empregadas como 'Waiters and Waitresses'.

Descrição do trabalho

Aceite pedidos e sirva alimentos e bebidas aos clientes nas mesas do estabelecimento de refeições.

SOC Code: 35-3031.00

Comentários (28)

Deixe um comentário
Gracie
04 nov 2025 14:59
As someone currently working as a waitress, it’s both interesting and a little scary to think about how fast things are changing. Robots could handle simple tasks like carrying food or taking orders, but real servers do so much more than that. We make people feel welcome, remembering regulars, and create personal experiences. Technology can help with the repetitive parts, but it can’t replace human connection. I think the future might have space for both robots and humans, working together to make dining more efficient while still keeping that personal touch that only humans can provide (personality and communication skills) .
Dan
21 jul 2025 16:01
I’ve been a server for 20 years. I feel my job has never been more threatened than it is right now due to AI. Customers do want an interactive social experience, yes, but I feel the businesses will try their absolute hardest to replace servers with AI and hope it doesn’t fail. Businesses have been fighting hard to make up the profits lost from covid, supply chain issues, inflation etc, so getting rid of the labor will be a high priority for them. Humans call out sick, demand benefits, complain to HR, get tired, make mistakes etc. AI won’t do any of those things. Having AI will help get rid of half the management staff too cause there will be less employees to babysit. Look at McDonalds. When you place your order you use the touchscreen computer now. Years ago you’d go to the counter and talk to a human. It will happen everywhere, grocery stores too.
Dan (Baixo)
22 mai 2025 20:55
People want a human experience. Maybe the kitchen staff will be replaced.
reilly (Altamente provável)
02 jul 2024 00:47
Japan.
ya (Altamente provável)
24 mar 2024 20:39
Now I start to see more robot waiters which can mean that soon, waiter jobs will be taken.
youausduasdasa (Altamente provável)
17 out 2023 02:49
because they just walk around and take order. Japan is already doing it so we should too
Alisha
31 ago 2023 23:17
AI is REALLY taking over the world!!!
SCARED for the next generation!!
Ernest Onunze (Baixo)
01 ago 2023 03:01
It is because it involves emotion and social understanding. Can AI interprets moods, feelings and stress this what waiters and waitress does better
Gwen (Baixo)
09 jun 2023 20:22
Food service workers in fast food, buffets, etc., do face a risk of replacement and you can already see it happening. Actual servers who provide full table service do not face the same risk, in my opinion.

Ultimately, going out to eat is an experience. Going through a drive-thru serves a functional purpose, you need food and you need it within minutes. Full service restaurants exist to give people somewhere to *go*. Somewhere to socialize, celebrate, grab a drink, mourn a bad day, take a load off, sit down with a good book, write a good book, get some office work done, etc., etc. It’s about experiencing human connections, even if you’re eating alone, you still have the company of your server, of the other patrons surrounding you. We crave human connection, we’re social creatures by nature, otherwise, everyone would just stay home. To-go and delivery has existed for forever and full service restaurants still stand, because the *people* are the draw.

Customers want to become regulars, they delight in their name or order being remembered, couples want a place they think of as “theirs” that they return to every year for their anniversary, they want to tell the server it’s their birthday so they can get that free piece of cake, so their waiter will wish them well or sing for them. They want someone to joke around with, to tease and be teased, to flirt, to leave their number on a receipt even though they know they won’t call. They want their baby to be cooed at and made to laugh. They want the bartender to listen to them wax poetic about their bad breakup. Speaking of bartenders, I don’t think people realize how much they keep you safe. They’ll keep an eye on your drink, put your purse behind the bar, toss out the drunken idiot harassing everyone.

And on a less positive note—people *especially* want someone to level their fury at. When their order is messed up or the food isn’t to their liking or when they have to wait too long to be seated. You can’t be mad at a robot. I mean, you can be, but I’m certain it won’t give the same satisfaction that whatever it is miserable people get out of bullying waitstaff. What I’m saying is—people crave human interaction…and that includes asking for the manager.

Maybe it would be a different story if AI could mimic human behavior, but even then, it can’t get around the uncanny valley effect. People need people.
Stu
07 abr 2023 09:42
As a customer it won’t be nearly as fun to watch a robot run after the condiments. Haha
Cd Guthrie (Sem chance)
06 mar 2023 11:45
Can’t anticipate guests needs and time constraints simultaneously while providing the warmth of caring
Stefan Deleanu (Baixo)
30 jul 2022 01:02
It is highly unlikely due to the social aspect of being a waiter. We can see this based on the effect home delivery services had on the HORECA industry. People still want social contact and not some robotic interaction.

I assume culture will change in future generations. This is similar to how there are love hotels and vending machines for everything in Japan, which wouldn't be acceptable in the Western world.
Bro
28 dez 2021 00:38
All the fast food restaurants now do this and most restaurants use seamless/Grubhub for delivery. Delivery to my table in the restaurant via my phone is next.
Mitch (Altamente provável)
08 out 2021 07:09
Low skill. Unnecessary. Humans performing the task are unpredictable and often unreliable.
Karl (Sem chance)
23 ago 2021 18:20
Where do servers make 11$ an hour? That's crazy low.
Chloe (Sem chance)
24 mai 2021 04:16
I do think robots could replace waiters at certain restaurants but not entirely. As a waitress I feel a lot of the customers are looking for a waitress not a robot or a screen to press, they’re coming to be served and for the personal interaction. Just look at places like hooters or the restaurants where the staff is paid to make crude jokes and insults to you. A robot can’t do that.
Bruna
20 mai 2021 21:54
Will robots also hear your romantic dramas or give you advice? Waiters' job is also about interaction
Jeffro (Baixo)
13 abr 2021 19:55
Upscale restaurant servers will always be human.
Julia
25 out 2020 14:29
I really hope not, some waiters and waitresses are really nice
austin (Incerto)
11 jun 2020 02:18
i certainly see fast food waiters being eliminated however "fancy" dine-in i think is less likely

Deixe uma resposta sobre esta ocupação
0/8000