Caixas
Deseja este resumo em seu site? Código de incorporação:
Risco de automação
Risco Iminente (81-100%): Ocupações neste nível têm uma probabilidade extremamente alta de serem automatizadas num futuro próximo. Esses trabalhos consistem principalmente em tarefas repetitivas e previsíveis, com pouca necessidade de julgamento humano.
Mais informações sobre o que é essa pontuação e como ela é calculada estão disponíveis aqui.
Enquete do usuário
Nossos visitantes votaram que é muito provável que esta ocupação seja automatizada. Esta avaliação é ainda mais apoiada pelo nível de risco de automação calculado, que estima 88% de chance de automação.
O que você acha que é o risco da automação?
Qual é a probabilidade de que Caixas seja substituído por robôs ou inteligência artificial nos próximos 20 anos?
Sentimento
Os seguintes gráficos são incluídos sempre que há uma quantidade substancial de votos para fornecer dados significativos. Essas representações visuais exibem os resultados das pesquisas de usuários ao longo do tempo, fornecendo uma indicação significativa das tendências de sentimentos.
Sentimento ao longo do tempo (trimestralmente)
Sentimento ao longo do tempo (anualmente)
Crescimento
Espera-se que o número de vagas de emprego para 'Cashiers' diminua 10,0% até 2032
Emprego total e estimativa de vagas de emprego
As projeções atualizadas são devidas 09-2023.
Salários
Em 2022, o salário anual mediano para 'Cashiers' foi de $28.240, ou $13 por hora
'Cashiers' receberam 39,0% a menos que o salário médio nacional, que ficou em $46.310
Salários ao longo do tempo
Volume
A partir de 2022 havia 3.296.040 pessoas empregadas como 'Cashiers' dentro dos Estados Unidos.
Isso representa cerca de 2,2% da força de trabalho empregada em todo o país
Dito de outra maneira, cerca de 1 em 44 pessoas são empregadas como 'Cashiers'.
Descrição do trabalho
Receba e distribua dinheiro em estabelecimentos que não sejam instituições financeiras. Pode usar scanners eletrônicos, caixas registradoras ou equipamentos relacionados. Pode processar transações de cartão de crédito ou débito e validar cheques.
SOC Code: 41-2011.00
Recursos
Se você está pensando em começar uma nova carreira ou procurando mudar de emprego, criamos uma ferramenta de busca de empregos útil que pode ajudá-lo a conseguir aquele novo papel perfeito.
Comentários
Deixe um comentário
Say Walmart.. These cashiers will be replaced by the customers whom they currently serve. IT is already happening.
McDonalds and the like: These will most likely be replaced by inhuman automation, and most people will not even care as these people are the ones who brought it on themselves thinking that they DESERVE to make more per hour than someone who actually has a skill set. THIS TOO, is already starting to happen, and as I thought, most people are more than happy to do this task on their own.
At Walmart however, people are a little upset that self serve is overtaking jobs. Kinda cool how that works.
Karma Baby!
My position required asking if a customer has an account or the benefits of taking a servey. A person who doesn’t understand English might also misinterpret the robot if it’s not built to accommodate their language. Robots can also misinterpret speech impediments, or even alternative augmented communications. Sudden glitches can exacerbate this.
However, some English native speakers are very skilled in understanding and communicating with ppl who don’t speak English compared to the average English native speaker not familiar with their language. You don’t have to be familiar with a person’s native language in order to precisely interpret accents or charades, that is, better than other English native speakers, with or without writing. I could make some of those non English speaking customers understand that they’re being asked about a store account and that they can win money from a survey, with or without writing, and I don’t share an ethnic background with most of those customers. This can make the buying process quicker and less frustrating with human interaction.
Many of the customers mentioned have English speaking relatives or translators, and PCs have translators in virtually every language. The US has no official languages, so they find a way to maneuver without speaking English. Unlike PCs, store computers only have Spanish and English. (I was exposed to people from all continents.)
Verbal communication and body language are the most vital keys to cashiering with people if all languages, and that’s why we still have human cashiers.
Our inventory computer system renews every night and is thus sometimes not accurate, so an empathetic humanistic voice may calm a customer.
A number of native English speakers fear AI replacing cashiers, whether it’s machine breakdown, misinformation, possible machine complexity, or political motivation later in the future (since they might become more human like but won’t get paid, or have some disadvantageous algorithmic agenda.) In the future, customers may feel more comfortable attacking the machine than another person.
Sorry joke. In fact you're right. Most people quit their job because of a bad boss, not because of the job.
So, there would still need to be at least one human employed in every restaurant to handle complaints by customers who didn't get their orders -- such as the manager.
1. Retail businesses may not have the profit margins to invest in robots/kiosks, the risk of this investment simply does not outweigh potential gains from it.
2. People are stupid and need help. People get frustrated already with kiosks, between finding things, coupon issues, questions about products, getting heavy things to vehicles. In a lot of retail settings cashiers double as customer service. Tech is ever evolving and it is hard for the average person to keep up, you would not believe how often I have to explain to people how to simply use there credit card.
3. Human to Human communication has a very large impact of returning customers. friendliness ratings have a very significant effects on weather or not a customer returns. robots simply cant recreate this.
4. retail businesses are constantly changing hands. When owners change so does the tech solutions, and integrating systems from different companies has caused many costly problems for retailers. Adding robots that run on these complicated inventory systems is just one more thing that can go wrong and potentially cause far more losses than the cost of an employee.
5. Tech is a business and the wouldn't be pushing for automation in retail without the potential for future profits. competition would lead to planned obsolescence and a lack of industry standards. This will mean that automation will not only be a huge investment, but will also come with routine costs to run. In the long run it may not be at all cheaper to replace minimum wage employees, If it made fiscal sense why hasn't macdonalds already done it? Big companies would have made the transition long ago if it was a guaranteed way to raise profits.
Deixe uma resposta sobre esta ocupação