Dyrektorzy muzyczni i kompozytorzy

21% (Niskie ryzyko)

Niskie ryzyko (21-40%): Zawody na tym poziomie mają ograniczone ryzyko automatyzacji, ponieważ wymagają połączenia umiejętności technicznych i skoncentrowanych na człowieku.

Więcej informacji na temat tego, czym jest ten wynik i jak jest obliczany, jest dostępne tutaj.

Ankieta użytkownika

Nastroje

Poniższy wykres jest zamieszczany wszędzie tam, gdzie istnieje znaczna liczba głosów, aby przedstawić istotne dane. Te wizualne reprezentacje pokazują wyniki ankiet użytkowników w czasie, dostarczając istotnych wskazówek dotyczących trendów nastrojów.

Płace

Umiarkowanie opłacany w porównaniu do innych zawodów

W 2023, mediana rocznej pensji dla 'Music Directors and Composers' wynosiła 62 590 $, czyli 30 $ za godzinę.

'Music Directors and Composers' otrzymali wynagrodzenie wyższe o 30,2% od średniej krajowej, która wynosiła 48 060 $

Płace z biegiem czasu

Komentarze

Leave a comment

beanz (Nie ma szans) 16 days ago

Because Automated machines don't have emotions (as you probably know by asking Siri or whatever,) a conductor, for one, would be impossible to replace because it would lack, first of all, free movement of the joints, and in the event it does become automated, would look EXTREMELY uncanny...

0 0 Reply

Nicholas Venet (Nie ma szans) 4 months ago

music can be performed by bots and you can have a robot conductor however the emotion of a musician, providing interpertions of word is not able to be replicated by robots

0 0 Reply

Joey (Niski) 4 months ago

You need a lot of emotion - something unable to be reproduced by robots - to have and do this job well. Also, originality is a BIG part of the job.

0 0 Reply

Bel (Niski) 10 months ago

Robots (IA's) will never match human creativity.

2 0 Reply

Joe (Niski) 12 months ago

It makes sense why some people would use AI for small things, like as background music for a YouTube video. Everywhere else, you'd have to have human minds and human limbs behind it. The way I see it, AI will never be Hans Zimmer or Jacob Collier. Not by a longshot.

2 0 Reply

Jaybird (Niski) 12 months ago

It’s too complex and subjective for individual AI feedback to be effective over the arc of learning

1 0 Reply

J (Niski) 1 year ago

The only people are impressed by the music AIVA and other AI technologies create are people who either lack an ability to evaluate music properly (they are not musical themselves and don't actively listen to music) or people who stand to gain if they can replace the creativity of composers with a program.

This is without taking into account all of the interpersonal elements of composition, which are also not well understood by people who don't do this work.

Finally, given that humans are subject to copyright law and that the level of imitation and inspiration from previous works is controlled and limited by these laws, it is unlikely that music created by AI that was not drastically reshaped by a human composer would avoid copyright lawsuits or be subject to copyright itself, as current technology in this field only knows how to aggregate and make stylistic choices based on probability. A human composer is not going to waste time fiddling with AI compositions to "get them there" when they could just write something themselves.

Show me an evangelist who actually produces music and isn't heavily invested in AI themselves in some way, and I'll reconsider.

4 0 Reply

Rachel Farina (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 2 years ago

AI is already composing and generating music. Algorithms can already curate. There will always be work for the top - John Williams, Hans Zimmer won't find their work gone. But for indie films and anyone on a budget, AI composing will be the thing within the next few years. The technology grows at an exponential pace. Though stuff sounds embarrassing now, six months from now, that will not be the case.

0 4 Reply

Marcus (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 2 years ago

As we already see everything can be done by sophisticated software. It started with pictures, then text and next is music. We all thought Software can never replace artists, but as we see that was a wrong assupmtion and in fact got hit first by the "AI" hype. With enough data and "training" any sort of music will be possible. Using a DAW will be obsolete.

0 2 Reply

Fl studio 20 (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 2 years ago

Art like graphic design is already being synthesized with superb detail using AI. What's to say that music isn't next?

0 3 Reply

yo lads (Umiarkowany) 3 years ago

i seen some robots making chunes and people saying they bussin beats
bye bye dutse, hesh and koot

1 2 Reply

Zac (Nie ma szans) 4 years ago

Even if they could it wouldn't be the same as a person composing and putting their input and ideas into the composition. The feeling and emotion has to come from within to create something astonishing in my opinion. Because of this, they wouldn't fully replace humans in music writing/composing.

2 0 Reply

John (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 4 years ago

There are already many ai composers like AIVA, so I am pretty sure in the next 15-20 years ai composers will replace human music composers.

0 1 Reply

DJ (Nie ma szans) 4 years ago

Produce own style of music, create melody you like, there is just no way AI could replace it

1 0 Reply

Gadgetsz 4 years ago

The act of composing will not be replaced BUT it will definitely change and maybe become more easy and accessible for all people. Maybe one day, everyone is a composer because you don't even need to learn score writing, DAW, playing or singing. Maybe just by thinking, you can create masterworks.. We will see?

0 0 Reply

EdwinBrophy 4 years ago

Composing pop music is already nearly completely automated but serious music will continue to require human composers.

1 1 Reply

Dave 2 years ago

Not true, and there is no such thing as 'serious music'

0 1 Reply

nathanuppnext 4 years ago

I'm a trap producer and its true

0 0 Reply

EdwinBrophyIsAClown 4 years ago

Composing pop music is not automated. Just because it is created on a computer doesn't mean it is automated, you still need human to create the ideas.

2 0 Reply

Joshua 5 years ago

People who learn the same music theories write different songs, so do robots. Robots are rarely likely to replace human beings in the field of composition.

1 1 Reply

Natalie (Niski) 5 years ago

Music would be awful of it was automated. Music requires feelings to be any good.

1 0 Reply

Joel (Nie ma szans) 6 years ago

Music, or the act of composing music, has no formula of equation to it. Music is the expression of one's emotions, often called the outburst of the soul. A robot or machine is literally incapable of having emotions or a soul, therefore a robot will never be able to replace a human composer.

1 0 Reply

Jason 5 years ago

You are wrong. A big part of AI works by spotting patterns. Patterns is relatively simple given that there are only so many notes and scales in music. It can even come out with sounds that arent be able to be produced by normal instruments. AI can already write articles somewhat. They can already compose music (see link below). Playing music is trivial and doesnt even require AI. There are only 2 things that an AI may have trouble with.

1. Which is understanding which part of what they created did a human like and thus may have trouble using reinforced learning.

2. Lyrics have meaning behind the words. Its much more complex than just a melody. Its these lyrics and building melody in combination with lyrics which is going to be rather difficult but not impossible. Lyric writing is going to be one of the Last things AI will be able to do.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYb3Wimn01s

1 1 Reply

Dylan Dukat 5 years ago

I’ll raise you this. Music is a sphere of culture, and as such evolves with culture. Looking throughout music’s history, there are evident reasons why eras change, morph, and evolve. The role of composers is to create a unique voice that resonates with ever-shifting cultural trends. AI can easily analyze music and replicate its patterns, sure. But, that’s not really the foundation of music composition. I could, in writing a work, replicate the unique qualities of Shostakovich or Schoenberg. I could tell you all about how Shostakovich’s music was a rally against the USSR, and balanced nationalism with individualism and a rebellion against the machine. I could tell you how Shoenberg used serialism as a direct counter to Romanticism, and how he managed to create beautiful music mathematically. And I could produce similar work. But doing that without self-stylized inspiration… is it really writing music anymore? And could AI write music as a counter to a political movement while adhering to its demands? Or could it revolutionize an entire artistic culture? That’s the question that forms the crux of the counter.

1 0 Reply

Anomius Maximus (Nie ma szans) 6 years ago

No way a robot would have ever been able to create a song as great, innovative, inspiring and culture changing as the masterpiece that is known as 'All Star' by Smash Mouth.

1 0 Reply

Matt 6 years ago

:)

1 0 Reply