Stewardessen

Laag Risico
32%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
38%
(Laag Risico)
PEILING
26%
(Laag Risico)
Average: 32%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
9,9%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 68.370
of $ 32,87 per uur
Volume
126.020
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
7,3/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

38% (Laag Risico)

Lage Risico (21-40%): Banen op dit niveau hebben een beperkt risico op automatisering, omdat ze een mix van technische en mensgerichte vaardigheden vereisen.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele zeer belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Krappe Werkruimte, Ongemakkelijke Posities

  • Anderen Assisteren en Verzorgen

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Sociale Waarneming

  • Overtuiging

Gebruikerspeiling

26% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 38% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Stewardessen binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Zeer snelle groei in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Flight Attendants' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 9,9% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Hoog betaald in vergelijking met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Flight Attendants' $ 68.370, of $ 32 per uur

'Flight Attendants' werden 42,3% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Groter bereik van werkgelegenheidskansen in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 126.020 mensen in dienst als 'Flight Attendants' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer 0,08% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 1 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Flight Attendants'.

Functieomschrijving

Bewaak de veiligheid van de vliegtuigcabine. Lever diensten aan luchtvaartpassagiers, leg veiligheidsinformatie uit, serveer eten en drankjes, en reageer op noodgevallen.

SOC Code: 53-2031.00

Middelen

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

annie (Geen kans) 2 months ago
because companies wont be willing to pay for that amount of robots and the maintenince that is needed on them, real people would be cheaper
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 9 months ago
You automate the plane to give instructions during turbulence and emergencies. Ease passengers into by updating the seats, rows, and overhead panels with attendants still onboard. From a safety perspective what is 2 attendants per class going to do for 20+ people, nothing other than give instruction and help 1 or 2 women and children. After introducing passengers to those improvements kick it up a notch and introduce 1 robot attendant for every 1 human attendant. This robot would initially be programmed to serve drinks and snacks. You would order it prior to the flight and on your phone or TV during the flight. Now that you have safety and procedures programmed right in to the plane and passengers have interacted with it over the last 10 years with a few iterations to their programming over time and passengers have been able to be served by a robot, the in cabin experience can now be fully automated. You could even design the robots to be smaller in size to fit more than two attendants in the class. Ultimately decreasing burnout by human staff, boarding times, the time it takes to get to the customer, etc.
0 1 Reply
PK (Geen kans) 11 months ago
FAA requires a crew member 1 for every 50. Flight attendant position is based on safety and security designated by FAA not customer service!!!
2 0 Reply
tony (Laag) 1 year ago
You're still going to need human intervention in an emergency. There are too many changes on a moments notice during flight to completely trust it to AI.
2 0 Reply
Philip (Onzeker) 1 year ago
I think aspects of the job could be automated but parts of the job won't be
0 0 Reply
Sofie (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 2 years ago
Humans can decide quicker in an emergency situation, but robots can take a while.

Plus, robots can't do such things as CPR or use a first aid kit, for example. So, it's pretty risky.
0 0 Reply
h (Laag) 2 years ago
AI and robots could mess up emergencies and need a connection to stay "alive"
1 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Laag) 3 years ago
By federal law (FAA), there needs to be 1 flight attendant per 50 seats on a plane. The number can never decrease even with robots. Good luck getting those robots to handle medical emergencies or breaking up fights between ignorant passengers or helping all you ungrateful passengers evacuate during an emergency in 90 seconds or less with no ability of rational thought LOL
0 0 Reply
Collin Tredo (Laag) 3 years ago
This job requires a friendly human face, people will be less comfortable having to talk to and trust a robot/AI when they get on a plane.
0 0 Reply
A (Geen kans) 3 years ago
Flight attendants use their knowledge to solve a situation given the surprise factor... it’s impossible to programme a robot that knows how to act in front of a surprise factor situation.

And by the way flight attendants are there to save u not to make u happy.

First priority is safety the If it’s possible the service time will come.
0 0 Reply
Spiros (Geen kans) 3 years ago
Flight attendants are there for one specific reason: safety. For this, human presence is important
0 0 Reply
Erebus (Laag) 3 years ago
It involves emotional labour which only a human is capable of.
0 0 Reply
JP (Matig) 4 years ago
With the global pandemic focusing minds on the amount of human contact passengers have on flights, I could see cabin crew being reduced in number to improve safety, with a Purser and assistant at each end of the aircraft being supplemented by robots which would handle more of the non-emergency workload. Robots would reduce the expense of accommodating cabin crew at destinations and would be able to clean the cabin autonomously using UV lights to disinfect the cabin air and surfaces.
0 0 Reply
A flight attendant (Geen kans) 4 years ago
Will absolutely not happen. What most do not realize is that flight attendants are on board for safety. It's just not something that can be replaced by robots.
1 0 Reply
Ebork (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 4 years ago
Flight attendants make or break flying. They'll be robots soon enough.
0 0 Reply
Izme;-; 3 years ago
I think that is wrong you see robots can also break easy, if there is a drunk passenger or causing harm robots can break with their wires. In medical procedures or any emergency humans would be faster than the robots having to mechanically bend down taking longer than humans.
0 0 Reply
THM 4 years ago
Flight attendants make your flying safe you ignorant.
1 0 Reply
JD (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 5 years ago
With the lousy customer service and the awfully attitudes these "air stewards(esses)" possess nowadays, I wouldn't be surprised that a machine will end up doing their job not only more quickly and efficiently, but for little to no cost of maintenance on said droids compared to paying salaries w/ benefits, retirement, etc & dealing with greedy unions, to people who don't do their job properly and are not even qualified to in the first place.

Given the recent horrific experiences passengers had to endure from these "flight attendants", I see machines replacing these incompetent humans in the future. It'll save the airlines plenty of revenue and avoid lawsuits and having to pay these poorly trained service attendants for mediocre to dismal services provided.

The only ones to blame would be the flight attendants themselves, because a machine did a better job than they ever would.
0 1 Reply
MC 1 year ago
JD I don't know what airline you have been flying on. I have been involved in the airline industry for over forty years, have traveled on numerous air carriers, and have never experienced what you have described in terms of lacking flight attendant professionalism, training, emergency, and medical preparedness.

I have witnessed a decline in the manners and decorum of the passengers traveling. Possibly, the added stress to passengers of airport safety procedures has taken a toll on their nerves. I remember when friends and family could accompany passengers to the gate. Now, the seats are packed in like sardines in a can.

Airline competition made the way for no-frills service and more passengers in smaller seats on airplanes. This has taken a toll on everyone's stress levels. Still, I see friendly FAs who are doing their best to accommodate everyone onboard and assuage those who are already frazzled by the time they take their seats.

A robot may make the dispersion of in-flight commodities easier but it can never take care of all of the emergencies that FAs are trained to handle, the medical emergencies, the duplicate and other seating problems, the myriad of human interactions that FA's handle, unaccompanied children, wheelchair passengers, interaction with cockpit and ground staff, etc., etc. the list goes on, not even considering a major emergency like a hijack incident.

You have vastly underestimated the uber-selective hiring, initial and ongoing training that FAs have. Did you know that they have to take FAA-mandated emergency testing yearly on every airplane which they are qualified to work and pass the test with a 90-100% grade. This includes physical testing in airplane simulators., first aide, resuscitation and cardio procedures etc.

If you see an FA behaving in the unprofessional manner you have described, you should write a letter to the airline about that employee.
1 0 Reply
GG 5 years ago
JD deserves the most awful flying experiences after the rudeness he showcased here.
1 0 Reply
Karen 5 years ago
When you have a heart attack on the plane who’s going to administer first aid to you? A robot? A flight attendant is there to save your ass not kiss it and their customer service is based on your attitude. It goes both ways
1 0 Reply
Eternity 4 years ago
With COVID, it would be ideal if airlines used robots instead. We'd rather not use flight attendant "services".
0 0 Reply
Ordinary Internet User 5 years ago
They will hire some flight attendants for those situations.
For example,
Today : 10 human flight attendants
Future: 1-3 human flight attendants, 7+ robot flight attendants.
Capish? :P
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.