동물학자 및 야생동물 생물학자

14% (최소한의 위험)

최소 위험 (0-20%): 이 범주에 속하는 직업은 복잡한 문제 해결, 창의성, 강한 대인 관계 능력, 그리고 높은 수준의 수동적 능력을 요구하기 때문에 자동화될 확률이 낮습니다. 이러한 일자리는 종종 복잡한 손동작과 정밀한 조정을 포함하며, 이는 기계가 필요한 작업을 복제하기 어렵게 만듭니다.

이 점수가 무엇인지, 그리고 어떻게 계산되는지에 대한 자세한 정보는 여기에 있습니다.

사용자 설문조사

감정

다음 그래프는 의미 있는 데이터를 제공할 수 있을 만큼 충분한 투표 수가 있을 때마다 포함됩니다. 이러한 시각적 표현은 시간 경과에 따른 사용자 투표 결과를 보여주며, 감정 추세에 대한 중요한 지표를 제공합니다.

임금

다른 직업에 비해 높은 급여를 받는

2023년에 'Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists'의 중앙값 연간 급여는 $70,600이며, 시간당 $33입니다.

'Zoologists and Wildlife Biologists'은 전국 중위임금인 $48,060보다 46.9% 더 높은 금액을 지불받았습니다.

시간에 따른 임금

댓글

Leave a comment

Clover (낮은) 2 months ago

An animal would barely act right around lets say a zookeeper, a robot would be crushed on the first day.

0 0 Reply

Paleoman77(I love Pooh) (낮은) 4 months ago

They have to have care for the animals, and the ability to improvise

0 0 Reply

Alex G. 4 months ago

This field doesn't require just research, it covers many advanced biological studies that simply can't be replicated by Artificial Intelligence. Field studies could require traveling and sorts, and there's no way computers can do that.

0 0 Reply

:] 4 months ago

I don't think AI could ever care for animals because of their different needs and changing patterns.

0 0 Reply

Lucy (기회 없음) 5 months ago

A robot cannot care for an animal in the wild, animals are too unpredictable

0 0 Reply

Étienne Pinsonneault (낮은) 5 months ago

While humans keep finding better and alternative methods to study animals, AI, which is trained on already existing things only, cannot create new methods, and thus cannot discover new species. However, there is still a chance that it may happen for some parts of the job that are repetitive and the same thing over and over again. And for the physical part of going out into the wild, robots are NOT advanced enough to do all of that movement and to know where to go next.

0 0 Reply

Anonymous (불확실한) 6 months ago

It's essentially researching, and AI has been learning more and more.

0 1 Reply

Viktor (낮은) 9 months ago

I voted low because you can not replace taking care of animals or studying animals with AI. Humans can somewhat understand animals and how they act, but I don't think AI think be able to feel empathy or care for animals like humans do.

0 0 Reply

ez (기회 없음) 1 year ago

because the animals deserve love and care not just being left to be care by robots with no feelings for the animals

0 0 Reply

No comment (기회 없음) 2 years ago

This job requires a lot of thinking on your feet which AI is not good at.

0 0 Reply

Stacy Fordyce 3 years ago

in 2020-2021 its very possible but I doubt that some robots are going to take over biology because they need human to create them and give them the info to do that. So really its all the human that study the wild life then give the robots info if you think about it.

0 0 Reply

Bryson Levake 1 year ago

I’m seeing this in 2023😂

0 0 Reply

Unknown (기회 없음) 3 years ago

Robots and animals don't mix. Animals are living and wild, robots are tech and man made and we shouldn’t replace them.

0 0 Reply

Deyah (기회 없음) 3 years ago

No way of replacing wildlife rangers with robots, because we all know robots can't nurture animals, their habitats as well as we can do it with more compassion

0 0 Reply

bill 4 years ago

robots are very good at collecting data but are really only good at doing one thing it could require many robots just to study in many fields and many robots to study the traits of the millions of organisms but technology is advancing at a quick rate so they might take over in the simpler areas

0 0 Reply

Jack Carroll (기회 없음) 4 years ago

Robots will need maintenance as well as the animals so no

0 0 Reply

Sam Holiday (낮은) 5 years ago

Robots can't really have a connection with animals.

0 0 Reply

Alex (기회 없음) 5 years ago

A field that requires flexible thought processes, where a project may not have an easily definable goal at the outset or need to have it's aims adjusted on the fly.

0 0 Reply