Panoramica
Rischio di Automazione
2. Sondaggio degli utenti
3. Crescita
Salari
5. Volume
Descrizione
Risorse
Commenti

Scrittori e Autori

Rischio Moderato
52%
Dove Vorresti Andare Prossimamente?
Condividi i tuoi risultati con amici e familiari.
Vota Commenti (96)
Oppure, esplora questa professione in maggiore dettaglio...
RISCHIO DI AUTOMAZIONE
CALCOLATO
60%
(Alto Rischio)
SONDAGGI
44%
(Rischio Moderato)
Average: 52%
DOMANDA DI LAVORO
CRESCITA
5,1%
entro l'anno 2033
SALARI
73.690 $
o 35,42 $ all'ora
Volume
49.450
a partire da 2023
SOMMARIO
PUNTEGGIO LAVORO
4,9/10

Le persone hanno anche visualizzato

Programmatori di Computer
Avvocati
Grafici
Attori
Sviluppatori Web

Rischio di automazione calcolato

60% (Alto Rischio)

Rischio Alto (61-80%): Le professioni in questa categoria affrontano una minaccia significativa dall'automazione, poiché molte delle loro attività possono essere facilmente automatizzate utilizzando le tecnologie attuali o di prossima generazione.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Alcune qualità piuttosto importanti del lavoro sono difficili da automatizzare:

  • Originalità

  • Persuasione

  • Percezione Sociale

Impact of Chat GPT on this occupation

We've received many comments and emails about Chat GPT and it's impact on this occupation. It's very impressive software, so people are understandably worried and/or excited.

However, something important to note with regards to the score we've calculated here, is that this occupation is comprised of many different types of job roles. Some examples of these include Advertising Writer, Blurb Writer, Copywriter and Screenwriter.

Some roles/tasks are more susceptible than other's to being automated by Chat GPT, but the score we've calculated is one that's an amalgamation of all of them.

Unfortunately, the source for our data (o*net) doesn't split this category up to the individual roles, so we can't calculate a score for each of them. If they do at some point in the future, we'll do the same, and generate scores accordingly.

Writing occupations aren't dead, but they are changing, so the best advice we can offer is to keep up to date with the latest developments, and use the tools available to your advantage.

Sondaggio degli utenti

44% possibilità di completa automazione nel prossimo ventennio

I nostri visitatori hanno votato che non sono sicuri se questa professione sarà automatizzata. Tuttavia, il livello di rischio di automazione che abbiamo generato suggerisce una possibilità di automazione molto più alta: 60% possibilità di automazione.

Cosa pensi sia il rischio dell'automazione?

Qual è la probabilità che Scrittori e Autori venga sostituito da robot o intelligenza artificiale nei prossimi 20 anni?






Sentimento

Il seguente grafico è incluso ovunque ci sia una quantità sostanziale di voti per rendere i dati significativi. Queste rappresentazioni visive mostrano i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione significativa delle tendenze di sentimento.

Sentimento nel tempo (trimestrale)

Sentimento nel tempo (annuale)

Crescita

Crescita moderata rispetto ad altre professioni

Il numero di offerte di lavoro per 'Writers and Authors' dovrebbe aumentare 5,1% entro il 2033

Occupazione totale e stime delle offerte di lavoro

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics per il periodo tra 2021 e 2031
Le previsioni aggiornate sono previste per 09-2024.

Salari

Altamente retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Writers and Authors' era di 73.690 $, o 35 $ all'ora.

'Writers and Authors' hanno ricevuto un salario 53,3% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volume

Gamma moderata di opportunità lavorative rispetto ad altre professioni

A partire dal 2023 c'erano 49.450 persone impiegate come 'Writers and Authors' negli Stati Uniti.

Questo rappresenta circa il < 0,001% della forza lavoro impiegata in tutto il paese

In altre parole, circa 1 su 3 mille persone sono impiegate come 'Writers and Authors'.

Descrizione del lavoro

Origina e prepara materiale scritto, come sceneggiature, storie, pubblicità e altro materiale.

SOC Code: 27-3043.00

Risorse

Will Chat GPT spell the end of blogging?

Here's a very informative video from Ricky Kesler from Income School about Chat GPT as it relates to blogging (and SEO). We think it contains great advice, and can be applied to all sorts of writing job roles, not just bloggers.

Cerca lavoro nella tua zona locale

Se stai pensando di iniziare una nuova carriera, o desideri cambiare lavoro, abbiamo creato un pratico strumento di ricerca del lavoro che potrebbe aiutarti a trovare il ruolo perfetto.

Cerca lavoro nella tua zona locale

Commenti

Leave a comment

EE (Moderato) 6 days ago
While AI and other tools can write, I don't think they're advanced enough YET to write on the same caliber as a human
0 0 Reply
John Galsworthy (Molto probabile) 15 days ago
It is clearly evident our jobs are not AI proof. Hell, I think there is only a matter of time, maybe 5-6 years when human writers will not be a thing anymore
0 0 Reply
Nicole (Basso) 25 days ago
Because AI can not replace the writers's feelings,thinkings,and personal experiences. Also, the sills of creativity etc.
0 0 Reply
Hope (Basso) 1 month ago
GPT and other AI generators may be able to write stories, but they don't come anywhere near human-written stories. Whenever asked to write a story, they always write it in a certain form, with similar plots. Nothing new or exciting. Plus, all humans think differently, so it would be impossible to model and AI that can think like every human. As a young author, I try to write stories outside the box that would be difficult for an AI to try replicating.
0 0 Reply
Sophie (Incerto) 3 months ago
LLM or Large Language Models like ChatGPT only outputs the material humans write. It also has no creativity, all outputs are based on our interactions, prompts and the existing data. Who creates that data? We do. We write our hearts, emotions out on a piece of writing, causing it to influence people, and we shape the way a person's bias works. What GPT outputs is something emotionless and cannot sway people. How much times have you been through sorrow from reading a book? How much times have you felt sorrow from a piece of text? Probably none.
0 2 Reply
Laurel 4 months ago
I'm an author, and I just thought I'd share my take on this. While it's true that AI can't replicate human emotions and experiences, it has proven to be capable of writing average stories. Too many people consume media without a critical eye. As long as people as a whole start to care more about quality media, we should be fine.
1 0 Reply
Adria Donohue (Basso) 4 months ago
Because at the current moment AI does not have to opacity to write a full length story without it being very repetitive and forgetting itself, and will only get worse as time goes on. Furthermore, an AI lacks the very human and unique emotion that a person can write into the story. I have tampered with the world of Artificial Intelligence before, and all the characters it portrays seem to be the same personality, like they've been copy and pasted. This is a problem AI struggles with that even humans suffer with, but humans are more able to fix this fatal error that can ruin a story.
0 0 Reply
Ele (Low) 5 months ago
As a writer myself, AI doesn't scare me because it lacks what writing and stories originally entail: experience. You can have a fantasy dystopia story written by ChatGPT, but it can never hold up to the bar human-made fantasy dystopian stories have set. Why? These stories contain human experiences, they contain a message that authors wish to convey, experiences authors wish to convey. It's the humanity that stories hold that make them loved by people. Any text-based AI can write a story, but will it ever hold the same impact to a story an actual person wrote? No, because AI hasn't experienced anything actual people have experienced. It only "sees" what people witness and puts it into its generation without second thought. The reason people consume stories is because they can relate to it, they learn something from it. I know AI helps breakdown and teach things we can't understand by piecing together information from the internet faster than we can, but for it to write a story? Fat chance. Writing is more than just fast money content (that, sadly, already is in today's times) it is a form of art that records experiences and messages that cannot be conveyed with straightforwardness. It is something that holds bits and pieces of humanity, of someone's memories, of messages that are so big that it can never fit in a simple sentence. No matter how many years it will take, AI can never catch up with how high the bar has been set when it comes to writing.
3 0 Reply
try (Incerto) 5 months ago
the originality of writing would be the most difficult to program a bot to do.
0 0 Reply
Ray (Basso) 5 months ago
Robots will never be able to copy real writers' creativity, although they could help you write a short essay for school, AI cannot do original and creative writing.
2 0 Reply
Human # 7,522,997,653 (Basso) 6 months ago
I don't really think AI will take over writing. In my eyes, AI will never capture the thrilling, magical, real experience that humans can create.

Although they have a chance, AI can never reach the same level of imagination that we humans have when it comes to stories and fiction.

Though I have very little hope for humanity in the future, I still believe humans can change for the better.
3 0 Reply
R H DARNELL (Basso) 6 months ago
Real writing uses creativity. AI is not creative, AI can only use what you input. It can rhyme, and write grammatically correct sentences, but it cannot convey emotion or elicit a response on a human level. I believe it could write a "good" outline, but not a good screenplay, much less a great book.
2 0 Reply
Pasi (Nessuna possibilità) 6 months ago
It depends on the author, but currently the AI simply can not write a good book.
1 0 Reply
Chris Ochs (Moderato) 8 months ago
News and nonfiction are high. Fantasy, sci-fi, horror novels far less so.
2 0 Reply
Dom (Basso) 8 months ago
Creativity, novelty, capturing the social, invention.
2 0 Reply
Rebecca (Basso) 8 months ago
Because robots tend to be predictable and writers need imagination and I don't see robots having that
2 0 Reply
Philip Whittebane (Molto probabile) 8 months ago
At least many blurb and screenwriting jobs could be automated. Although there would still be the requirement for some level of creativity
2 0 Reply
Tomoko Julius (Nessuna possibilità) 9 months ago
i doubt that any time soon the originality of the human touch will fade away with the coming in of AI. It simply cannot. PERIOD!!!
0 0 Reply
Mike (Molto probabile) 9 months ago
Highly only because ChatGPT is used for writing, and it can be used in story making
0 0 Reply
copper (Nessuna possibilità) 9 months ago
the robots simply lack the creativity of a good author like J.K.Rowling or Suzanne Collins.
0 0 Reply

Lascia un commento su questa professione

Questo sito è protetto da reCAPTCHA e si applicano la Politica sulla Privacy e i Termini di Servizio di Google.