Programmatori di Computer

70% (Alto Rischio)

Rischio Alto (61-80%): Le professioni in questa categoria affrontano una minaccia significativa dall'automazione, poiché molte delle loro attività possono essere facilmente automatizzate utilizzando le tecnologie attuali o di prossima generazione.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Sondaggio degli utenti

Sentimento

Il seguente grafico è incluso ovunque ci sia una quantità sostanziale di voti per rendere i dati significativi. Queste rappresentazioni visive mostrano i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione significativa delle tendenze di sentimento.

Salari

Molto ben retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Computer Programmers' era di 99.700 $, o 47 $ all'ora.

'Computer Programmers' hanno ricevuto un salario 107,4% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

Commenti

Leave a comment

Sinus46 (Basso) 4 days ago

AI cannot create new content outside of the data it was trained on. There is no way that an AI can write an entire new computer program without first looking at actual programs written by humans

0 0 Reply

Francesco Giovannini (Basso) 4 days ago

Contrary to popular belief, the work of a quality programmer is very creative and is not easily replaceable by automated processes.

0 0 Reply

Mark Orsted (Basso) 1 month ago

I think that we cannot trust software to understand the human experience. I use agentic and non-agentic AI to help code now, after 30 years doing this, and it's primary benefit is saving me from typing a lot of code that I know how to write, and can confirm is written properly, or correct as needed. The "correct as needed" factor is VERY high still.

3 2 Reply

Dev (Moderato) 1 month ago

AI adds another attack surface to software development companies

1 0 Reply

Titus (Molto probabile) 1 month ago

Once A.I. overtakes human intelligence it will write billions of lines of code error free with simple prompts from any person wanting a digital product. Why would any company need overpaid, error prone people at that point. Learn a trade quickly programmers!

1 7 Reply

Jim 10 days ago

AI is not intelligent at all. It uses basic pattern matching and heuristics. That is why it needs massive amounts of training data, most of which is created by companies. This has big limitations and second order effects like how AI will be biased according to data (Facial recognition software labels black people gorillas, etc, grok with neo-nazi views).

0 1 Reply

Swayam Bhowmick (Molto probabile) 1 month ago

Everyone who's commenting and judging is basing their judgment on the current state of things. But, the current state is rapidly evolving, and most people are failing to account for the trajectory that the progress of AI is taking. 2 years ago, we were laughing at AI-generated videos of Will Smith eating spaghetti; today, the realism sends shivers down our spines. 2 years ago, AI generated broken code, now, it's capabale of somewhat functional code, replacing junior devs entirely.

Please take into account the trajectory of progress rather than the current state of things.

5 3 Reply

Ab (Molto probabile) 2 months ago

It does not require any physical interaction with the real world

1 9 Reply

Habs (Incerto) 2 months ago

Software development includes understanding requirements and talking to customers (who do not know what they want). My job will be heavily automated but not yet to be fully replaced by AI.

2 2 Reply

Name (Basso) 2 months ago

AIs kind of suck at programming and logic they always add more bugs into my code

10 4 Reply

A 2 months ago

Currently. What about in 10 years though

8 1 Reply

John 2 months ago

Just as a few other professions, I’d say it would simply be limited to reducing unspecialized, entry-level positions. Those who find a niche would find that programming with chatbots are like lugging a junior dev that doesn’t learn around.

1 0 Reply

Everyone’s in denial 3 months ago

I am not saying I support the automation of everything, it’s just that in reality no one is safe as it accelerates. This is not just an assistant, nor just a displacement of humans, it is the complete replacement of the human mind. Pandora’s box was opened, now we have no idea if we will enter dystopia or utopia...

8 6 Reply

Jordan 2 months ago

No it is not. LLM's don't replicate how human brains work at all.

3 2 Reply

Tony B (Basso) 3 months ago

AI has so far been good for created standard well known solutions. It is not good at all at understanding large amounts of existing code.

7 3 Reply

Jersey Jim 3 months ago

Getting better every week. MCP. Augment Code. LLM rules.

2 1 Reply

Mu (Basso) 3 months ago

They will be reduced but not entirely replaced. This can be in ai research to improve the programming or new novel types of Research

1 2 Reply

Jacob (Basso) 4 months ago

It will change a sofware engineer is still going to be required to check the code. You aren't going to want this to automated that's crazy.

5 0 Reply

Timothy (Moderato) 4 months ago

"For example, tasks or task components that appeal to capacities in which AI systems excel, will have to be less (or less fully) mastered by people, so that less training will probably be required. AI systems are already much better than people at logically and arithmetically correct gathering (selecting) and processing (weighing, prioritizing, analyzing, combining) large amounts of data. They do this quickly, accurately and reliably. They are also more stable (consistent) than humans, have no stress and emotions and have a great perseverance and a much better retention of knowledge and skills than people. As a machine, they serve people completely and without any “self-interest” or “own hidden agenda.”"

0 0 Reply

Michał (Molto probabile) 4 months ago

Without knowing programming at this point you can easily write a good program with the help of AI. I completely agree that this work can be automated.

0 8 Reply

Jordan 2 months ago

There's a serious difference between it works and it works correctly. Without understanding the code and testing it, all you've done is make a polished turd.

2 0 Reply

TAmzid2872 (Incerto) 5 months ago

Programming isnt just about writing code, its about problem solving

12 0 Reply

Sven H. (Molto probabile) 5 months ago

AI can already code extremely well; there will be no need for human programmers in the future.

1 7 Reply

Doubtful (Basso) 5 months ago

AI is horrible at following instructions, and bad at understanding architecture. Also, as context grows it tends to forget instructions.

7 1 Reply

Jersey Jim 4 months ago

Model Context Protocol helps give AI better context. AI can work across many files now (way better IDE integration has happened in the past 6 months). The limits of AI have dwindled and will continue to dwindle as time goes on. Vibe coding is now a thing and AI can follow directions to build complete mvp's in under an hour.

0 1 Reply

Jordan 2 months ago

MVPs are not working reliable software that solves a real problem.

1 0 Reply

Michael Bohn (Incerto) 6 months ago

For the AI to work properly, you need people who know how to write the prompts and how to evaluate the written code.

6 2 Reply

... 5 months ago

How does this relate to programmers? Programmers program not write prompts. Evaluation to code is already possible

0 0 Reply

Pavel 5 months ago

But if AI becomes as good as humans then why programmers would be ever needed if not those who work on AI itself? Maybe for some complex and big programms people would still be needed.

0 0 Reply