Matematici

Rischio Basso
25%
Dove Vorresti Andare Prossimamente?
Condividi i tuoi risultati con amici e familiari.
Vota Commenti (22)
Oppure, esplora questa professione in maggiore dettaglio...
RISCHIO DI AUTOMAZIONE
CALCOLATO
28%
(Rischio Basso)
SONDAGGI
21%
(Rischio Basso)
Average: 25%
DOMANDA DI LAVORO
CRESCITA
3,7%
entro l'anno 2033
SALARI
116.440 $
o 55,98 $ all'ora
Volume
2.220
a partire da 2023
SOMMARIO
PUNTEGGIO LAVORO
7,0/10

Le persone hanno anche visualizzato

Rischio di automazione calcolato

28% (Rischio Basso)

Rischio Basso (21-40%): Lavori a questo livello hanno un rischio limitato di automazione, in quanto richiedono un mix di competenze tecniche e centrato sull'uomo.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Alcune qualità piuttosto importanti del lavoro sono difficili da automatizzare:

  • Originalità

Sondaggio degli utenti

21% possibilità di completa automazione nel prossimo ventennio

I nostri visitatori hanno votato che c'è una bassa probabilità che questa professione sarà automatizzata. Questa valutazione è ulteriormente supportata dal livello di rischio di automazione calcolato, che stima una possibilità di automazione del 28%.

Cosa pensi sia il rischio dell'automazione?

Qual è la probabilità che Matematici venga sostituito da robot o intelligenza artificiale nei prossimi 20 anni?






Sentimento

Il seguente grafico è incluso ovunque ci sia una quantità sostanziale di voti per rendere i dati significativi. Queste rappresentazioni visive mostrano i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione significativa delle tendenze di sentimento.

Sentimento nel tempo (annuale)

Crescita

Crescita moderata rispetto ad altre professioni

Il numero di offerte di lavoro per 'Mathematicians' dovrebbe aumentare 3,7% entro il 2033

Occupazione totale e stime delle offerte di lavoro

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics per il periodo tra 2021 e 2031
Le previsioni aggiornate sono previste per 09-2024.

Salari

Molto ben retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Mathematicians' era di 116.440 $, o 55 $ all'ora.

'Mathematicians' hanno ricevuto un salario 142,3% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volume

Gamma di opportunità lavorative notevolmente inferiore rispetto ad altre professioni

A partire dal 2023 c'erano 2.220 persone impiegate come 'Mathematicians' negli Stati Uniti.

Questo rappresenta circa il < 0,001% della forza lavoro impiegata in tutto il paese

In altre parole, circa 1 su 68 mille persone sono impiegate come 'Mathematicians'.

Descrizione del lavoro

Conduci ricerche in matematica fondamentale o nell'applicazione di tecniche matematiche alla scienza, alla gestione e ad altri campi. Risolvi problemi in vari campi utilizzando metodi matematici.

SOC Code: 15-2021.00

Risorse

Se stai pensando di iniziare una nuova carriera, o desideri cambiare lavoro, abbiamo creato un pratico strumento di ricerca del lavoro che potrebbe aiutarti a trovare il ruolo perfetto.

Cerca lavoro nella tua zona locale

Commenti

Leave a comment

Guest 4 months ago
Aaaand Google DeepMind invented AI (AlphaGeometry 2 and AlphaProof) that solves IMO on silver medal. That escalated quickly...
1 1 Reply
Kevin Gonzalez Gordillo 4 months ago
Lately, I have been studying Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, and I was thinking, could an AI, or even an AGI, discover that in a consistent system of arithmetic, there are true statements that cannot be proven (incomplete system)? I mean the level of self-awareness and nuance that it would take to discover such a theorem and prove it true would be astounding since not even the best mathematicians of Gödel's times were convinced that was the case. So at this level of logic, I would really doubt an AI would take the jobs of people responsible for opening the heart of mathematics and showing the gaping hole of its fundamental flaw; for any mathematician reading this: Let's keep proving the true, the false, and the unprovable truths, and let's "embrace the unknown at the heart of any quest for truth" -(TED-Ed).
1 0 Reply
papo (Nessuna possibilità) 5 months ago
Mathematics is a science that is still in discovery, AI will not be able to understand this context
0 0 Reply
skyss0fly (Moderato) 7 months ago
Robots have to utilise logic in their programming using arithmetic skills and therefore use mathematics to perform tasks and as such can compute mathematical tasks quite easily
0 0 Reply
Chickenlover69 4 months ago
Being a mathematician is researching math itself, like science. It needs creativity and human intelligence. For example, I certainly don't think AI can discover or invent complex numbers such as i, i = sqrt(-1). But I think you misunderstood the job of a mathematician as you probably thought that they just solve regular math questions that we already know how to solve, no it's not. Math is part of science and will always will be. Science will never be able to be taken over by AI. Remember that.
0 0 Reply
Anon (Incerto) 11 months ago
Logic can be programmed, so they may be able to eventually prove theorems
0 0 Reply
Europe2048 (Moderato) 1 year ago
Maybe WolframAlpha is taking over?
0 0 Reply
Me (Nessuna possibilità) 1 year ago
Mathematical insights rely on human originality.
0 0 Reply
Anish (Molto probabile) 1 year ago
It will simply outclass us in every field.
0 0 Reply
Probabilist 1 year ago
Mathematicians generally find new ideas to solve problems, they also find new questions, whereas AI is just able to copy what already exists and to adapt it to classical situations. But maybe mathematicians will be able to create themself a new AI which will be able to replace them !!
0 0 Reply
Andre (Molto probabile) 1 year ago
People saying this is unlikely are silly. The progress in the field of computer generated proofs has been faster than the progress in AI art. I don't expect any of the Millennium Prize problems to be solved by humans, and I expect them all solved by 2030.
0 0 Reply
Jason 4 months ago
I find it equally silly when you say that none of the Millennium Prize problems will be solved by Humans and all of them will be solved by 2030 (I consider myself an amateur mathematician at best, but from what I understand, the Poincare conjecture has been solved, and the solver, Grigori Perelman I think he's human?) I've hanged out in some mathematics communities and from what I've seen ai has proved some competitive math questions, I guess the four color theorem requires computer assistance, and I've seen Terrence Tao say that Ai could be used to help give Ideas to mathematicians? I've tried searching up ai replacing mathematicians and i only get results of lean which from what i know really only checks if a theorem is right or not. Overall I find the statement that Ai will complete all of the Millennium problems by 2030 to be ridiculous Ai does not seem to be anywhere close to proving some of the most fundamental century old problems in essentially 6 years
2 0 Reply
Carlos (Nessuna possibilità) 2 years ago
I believe that even general AI will require a lot of time to reach a level where it can be compared on a full basis to a human in regards to maths.
0 0 Reply
Saurabh Sarkar (Nessuna possibilità) 3 years ago
AI was created from Math. Its development is dependent on the development of new Math. It will be next to impossible for AI to develop new functional math.
0 0 Reply
James (Incerto) 3 years ago
Because, AI and supercomputer can overtake the common knowledge
0 0 Reply
Jo 3 years ago
If you've ever done college level math and the number of ways you've been told to "Do it by inspection" and the unconventional method that every solution takes, Math is very unlikely to become automated.
0 0 Reply
AK (Nessuna possibilità) 3 years ago
Mathematics can go so far, there are literally so infinite possibilities. That may sound extreme but there are so many number systems out there that mathematicians are uncovering everyday as a team and they still can not find all of them. A computer may be faster but since there are so many possibilities both mathematicians and computers must work TOGETHER.
0 0 Reply
Alex (Basso) 3 years ago
Mathematics requires quite a bit of creativity, which AI is not capable of.
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al-Zharani 4 years ago
Mathematicians being replaced by AI technology is not a bad idea. But this still upsets some people. Like me yes I'm a little upset but I don't I'll be thinking about creating jobs for mathematicians that hasn't bee in the (mathematics society) something like a direct career path for full time mathematicians. If is that secondary school teaching alright but not other job opportunities provided for mathematicians. I'm still thinking about the medicine field & how are experts in the field medicine are going to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) & also occupations like engineers or scientists.
0 0 Reply
Mon 2 years ago
Which career is most persistent to be replaced by AI according to you?
0 0 Reply
kevin (Basso) 5 years ago
Mathematics at its core requires a lot of creativity, something which AI is as of yet not good at. However AI will of course play a big role in defining potential research and we already see AI being used to find interesting mathematical patterns that we as humans have overlooked. It will be an aid to us, at least for the short/medium term.
0 0 Reply
seojin (Nessuna possibilità) 5 years ago
well at first you need creativity to think about what should he do,
and AI does not have creativity!
so AI could be assistant not mathematicians.
0 0 Reply

Lascia un commento su questa professione

Questo sito è protetto da reCAPTCHA e si applicano la Politica sulla Privacy e i Termini di Servizio di Google.