Piloti Commerciali

Rischio Moderato
47%
Dove Vorresti Andare Prossimamente?
Condividi i tuoi risultati con amici e familiari.
Vota Commenti (96)
Oppure, esplora questa professione in maggiore dettaglio...
RISCHIO DI AUTOMAZIONE
CALCOLATO
55%
(Rischio Moderato)
SONDAGGI
39%
(Rischio Basso)
Average: 47%
DOMANDA DI LAVORO
CRESCITA
5,7%
entro l'anno 2033
SALARI
113.080 $
o 54,36 $ all'ora
Volume
52.750
a partire da 2023
SOMMARIO
PUNTEGGIO LAVORO
6,2/10

Le persone hanno anche visualizzato

Rischio di automazione calcolato

55% (Rischio Moderato)

Rischio Moderato (41-60%): Le professioni con un rischio moderato di automazione coinvolgono solitamente compiti di routine, ma richiedono ancora un certo giudizio umano e interazione.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Alcune qualità piuttosto importanti del lavoro sono difficili da automatizzare:

  • Spazio di Lavoro Stretto, Posizioni Scomode

  • Destrezza Manuale

  • Destrezza delle Dita

  • Assistere e Prendersi Cura degli Altri

  • Percezione Sociale

Sondaggio degli utenti

39% possibilità di completa automazione nel prossimo ventennio

I nostri visitatori hanno votato che c'è una bassa probabilità che questa professione sarà automatizzata. Tuttavia, il livello di rischio di automazione che abbiamo generato suggerisce una probabilità più alta di automazione: 55% probabilità di automazione.

Cosa pensi sia il rischio dell'automazione?

Qual è la probabilità che Piloti Commerciali venga sostituito da robot o intelligenza artificiale nei prossimi 20 anni?






Sentimento

Il seguente grafico è incluso ovunque ci sia una quantità sostanziale di voti per rendere i dati significativi. Queste rappresentazioni visive mostrano i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione significativa delle tendenze di sentimento.

Sentimento nel tempo (trimestrale)

Sentimento nel tempo (annuale)

Crescita

Crescita rapida rispetto ad altre professioni

Il numero di offerte di lavoro per 'Commercial Pilots' dovrebbe aumentare 5,7% entro il 2033

Occupazione totale e stime delle offerte di lavoro

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics per il periodo tra 2023 e 2033
Le previsioni aggiornate sono previste per 09-2025.

Salari

Molto ben retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Commercial Pilots' era di 113.080 $, o 54 $ all'ora.

'Commercial Pilots' hanno ricevuto un salario 135,3% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volume

Gamma moderata di opportunità lavorative rispetto ad altre professioni

A partire dal 2023 c'erano 52.750 persone impiegate come 'Commercial Pilots' negli Stati Uniti.

Questo rappresenta circa il < 0,001% della forza lavoro impiegata in tutto il paese

In altre parole, circa 1 su 2 mille persone sono impiegate come 'Commercial Pilots'.

Descrizione del lavoro

Pilota e naviga il volo di aerei a ala fissa su rotte di compagnie aeree non programmate, o elicotteri. Richiede il certificato di Pilota Commerciale. Include piloti charter con certificazione simile, e piloti di ambulanze aeree e tour aerei. Esclude piloti di compagnie aeree regionali, nazionali e internazionali.

SOC Code: 53-2012.00

Risorse

Cerca lavoro nella tua zona locale

Se stai pensando di iniziare una nuova carriera, o desideri cambiare lavoro, abbiamo creato un pratico strumento di ricerca del lavoro che potrebbe aiutarti a trovare il ruolo perfetto.

Cerca lavoro nella tua zona locale

Commenti

Leave a comment

Luca (Basso) 20 days ago
requires human interference in accidents and emergencies
have to be 1000% reliable in order to not cause problems
can scare public away
0 0 Reply
Felipe (Basso) 22 days ago
Simple. The pilot is the hierarchy within the system. Today, AI can indeed perform even complex tasks, but you can never trust an AI 100% to pilot an airplane. The critical factor is simple: if there is any change or problem with the aircraft, a pilot can act quickly by not strictly following airline protocols. Following protocols 100% does not always guarantee safety.

Examples like TACA Flight 110, where a Boeing 737-300 lost both engines, show this. Instead of following the manual and returning, the pilots landed on the grass ahead, which was the right decision. This applies to many situations. In the case of United Airlines Flight 232, it's another example. Following the correct protocols isn't always the right choice and can sometimes prevent worse tragedies.

In the United case, let's suppose an AI is in command and the plane loses all three hydraulic systems. The company's manual doesn't cover a situation where all engines are lost. At that moment, what would the AI do? Even if it follows the tower controller's voice commands correctly, it’s impossible to determine the flight's fate because there's no human inside. However, this isn't to say that following protocols is always wrong. It’s just a reminder to follow protocols, but if you ever need to break them, it should be in a life-or-death situation.
2 0 Reply
Furry Racoon Cat (Moderato) 1 month ago
With autopilot becoming more prevalent and the rise of autonomous navigation systems, there is a chance that pilots could be replaced.
0 2 Reply
Joe (Nessuna possibilità) 2 months ago
Pilots cannot be replaced by AI since there are many skills that AI can't possess like complex decision making and most passengers wouldn't trust AI to operate their aircraft. 20 years from now, many of the newer planes that fly nowadays will still be flying in 2040. Another consideration is the single pilot operation, which is the primary focus right now which will not likely happen before the 2040s. Pilots have minimal risk of being automated.
2 1 Reply
Stirling Martin (Basso) 2 months ago
Cybersecurity could make this impossible.
0 1 Reply
Ron Hounslow (Nessuna possibilità) 2 months ago
All large commercial aircraft currently in production and coming off the production line today need two pilots for operation during crucial stages of flight. It will take a decade plus plus for the regulatory requirement to change,

Many of those airframes are going to be in service for the next fifteen to twenty years plus.

What you may see in the next decade or so is a reduction in the number of pilots required by the industry overall if single pilot in the cruise becomes allowable on Long Haul Flights.
1 1 Reply
do not want to say (Basso) 2 months ago
because eve with ai there will be thousand of plane in the sky at one time and one miscalculation from the ai on a plane can cause it to crash
0 1 Reply
EK1934 (Incerto) 3 months ago
The thing is, it will take a long time to develop and for AI to get approved by the FAA
1 1 Reply
Miles (Basso) 3 months ago
commercial pilots have some instances of ai but commercial pilots take years of training naps and skills to complete
And ai would need to learn a lot of controls and would need precise management one small move and the ai is done.
0 1 Reply
Mani salah (Basso) 4 months ago
The artificial intllegence can't replace the human's emotion and it's way of thinking in some situations and must be supervised by a trained and experienced pilot
3 1 Reply
Aranyak Maitra (Moderato) 5 months ago
The development of automated and remote flying technology for military equipment can be a game changer for civil aviation industry. Automation has already reduced the number of pilots from 3 to 2.
1 5 Reply
Luke (Nessuna possibilità) 5 months ago
Pilots can do things robots can't. Somtimes you can't follow the rules and need to break them. Think about the gimli glider. The pilot had no landing gear, he was way too high and way too fast. He did a side slip menuveur, only able to be completed in glider aircraft. It was a risky move but it would have to be done if they wanted to land. They succeded by breaking the rules and testing the limits. That is somthing that can nevery be done by a robot.
9 0 Reply
Lucas 5 months ago
true
2 0 Reply
someone (Basso) 6 months ago
because there is still going to be someone watching over the ai to make sure it doesn't make mistakes and also someone needs to take over in an emergency
0 0 Reply
Mohammad 5 months ago
That is true but i don't think the AI will move to commercial planes any time soon, but for military planes, they will take 90% for sure soon
0 0 Reply
Lisa (Incerto) 7 months ago
This one is tricky! I do not doubt AI could learn to proficiently drive a plane, though I do doubt if they're reliable in terms of safety. I foresee companies using this to cut costs, only to receive public outcry in return. I think the real question here is: Do we want artificial intelligence driving our planes?
2 0 Reply
Matheus (Basso) 8 months ago
The competent regulatory body, (FAA) is VERY conservative. So even if we had the technology, I doubt that they would allow autonomous commercial planes.
In this case, regulation is the hold-up, not the technology.
2 0 Reply
Hayden (Nessuna possibilità) 9 months ago
I am training to become a pilot. Knowing how complicated everything is and how many things can go wrong, I would never step foot on an AI-flown plane. What will AI do when an emergency that it hasn't been programmed for occurs? If you go look through the history of incidents, you'll find that there are way more complicated issues than a simple engine failure that can occur. Not to mention the concern of hacking.
1 2 Reply
Not important 7 months ago
Remember that AI is able to think. It's not like a random program that runs to control the plane. AI will have ALL the information on the internet. So, it is difficult for you but not for AI.

And mind you, most plane accidents happen due to pilot error. :) AI can eliminate that.
0 5 Reply
Lisa 7 months ago
I'm not sure if the term "think" would be best for the situation. I say AI uses logic and percentile to decide what is best, based off of what humans have done before. Looking at the success rates, artificial intelligence picks out which route is safest and goes with it.

I agree with you, although there are some concerns with how AI could work in unique emergencies that have never occurred in the past, and how AI would work with the human crew members.
6 0 Reply
Ryan (Nessuna possibilità) 9 months ago
It's already dangerous enough as it is so I don't think it'll be wise to let AI take control of planes, especially with all its faults. Maybe in 50 years at least.
0 2 Reply
Anonymous 5 months ago
You are in more danger driving your car to work then taking a flight to Chicago.
0 0 Reply
.. 8 months ago
planes are the single safest form of transportation there is but i agree it will take atleast 50 yrs
0 1 Reply
asdf (Basso) 9 months ago
people don't trust em
0 0 Reply
Bao Nam (Nessuna possibilità) 9 months ago
Because flying airplanes is very hard to do, if done not correctly, the plane could crash, the A.I is smart but some times the A.I will have errors that cannot be fixed. I think just that.
2 0 Reply
Sina (Nessuna possibilità) 10 months ago
A human being is required to accept legal responsibility
1 0 Reply

Lascia un commento su questa professione

Questo sito è protetto da reCAPTCHA e si applicano la Politica sulla Privacy e i Termini di Servizio di Google.