Architetti, eccetto Paesaggisti e Navali

Rischio Minimo
20%

Dove Vorresti Andare Prossimamente?

Condividi i tuoi risultati con amici e familiari.

Oppure, esplora questa professione in maggiore dettaglio...

RISCHIO DI AUTOMAZIONE
CALCOLATO
0,0%
(Rischio Minimo)
SONDAGGI
40%
(Rischio Basso, Basato su 975 voti)
Average: 20%
DOMANDA DI LAVORO
CRESCITA
7,8%
entro l'anno 2033
SALARI
93.310 $
o 44,86 $ all'ora
Volume
111.170
a partire da 2023
SOMMARIO
Cosa mostra questo fiocco di neve?
Il Fiocco di Neve è un riepilogo visivo dei cinque distintivi: Rischio di Automazione (calcolato), Rischio (interrogato), Crescita, Salari e Volume. Ti fornisce un'istantanea immediata del profilo di un'occupazione. Il colore del Fiocco di Neve è correlato alla sua dimensione. Più un'occupazione ottiene un punteggio alto rispetto alle altre, più il Fiocco di Neve diventa grande e verde.
PUNTEGGIO LAVORO
7,8/10
Cos'è questo?
Punteggio del lavoro (più alto è meglio):

Valutiamo i lavori utilizzando quattro fattori. Questi sono:

- Possibilità di essere automatizzati
- Crescita del lavoro
- Salari
- Volume di posizioni disponibili

Questi sono alcuni aspetti chiave da considerare quando si cerca un lavoro.

Le persone hanno anche visualizzato

Programmatori di Computer Avvocati Grafici Ingegneri Civili Commercialisti e Revisori Contabili

Rischio di automazione calcolato

0,0% (Rischio Minimo)

Rischio Minimo (0-20%): Le professioni in questa categoria hanno una bassa probabilità di essere automatizzate, poiché richiedono tipicamente la risoluzione di problemi complessi, creatività, forti competenze interpersonali e un alto grado di destrezza manuale. Questi lavori comportano spesso movimenti manuali intricati e una coordinazione precisa, rendendo difficile per le macchine replicare i compiti richiesti.

Ulteriori informazioni su cosa sia questo punteggio e su come viene calcolato sono disponibili qui.

Alcune qualità molto importanti del lavoro sono difficili da automatizzare:

  • Originalità

Alcune qualità piuttosto importanti del lavoro sono difficili da automatizzare:

  • Percezione Sociale

  • Belle Arti

  • Persuasione

  • Trattativa

Sondaggio degli utenti

40% possibilità di completa automazione nel prossimo ventennio

I nostri visitatori hanno votato che c'è una bassa probabilità che questa professione sarà automatizzata. Questa valutazione è ulteriormente supportata dal livello di rischio di automazione calcolato, che stima una possibilità di automazione del 0,0%.

Cosa pensi sia il rischio dell'automazione?

Qual è la probabilità che Architetti, eccetto Paesaggisti e Navali venga sostituito da robot o intelligenza artificiale nei prossimi 20 anni?

Sentimento

Il seguente grafico viene mostrato dove ci sono abbastanza voti per produrre dati significativi. Visualizza i risultati dei sondaggi degli utenti nel tempo, fornendo un'indicazione chiara delle tendenze di sentimento.

Sentimento nel tempo (annuale)

Crescita

Crescita molto veloce rispetto ad altre professioni

Il numero di offerte di lavoro per 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' dovrebbe aumentare 7,8% entro il 2033

Occupazione totale e stime delle offerte di lavoro

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics per il periodo tra 2023 e 2033
Le previsioni aggiornate sono previste per 09-2025.

Salari

Molto ben retribuito rispetto ad altre professioni

Nel 2023, il salario annuo mediano per 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' era di 93.310 $, o 45 $ all'ora.

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' hanno ricevuto un salario 94,2% superiore al salario mediano nazionale, che si attestava a 48.060 $

Salari nel tempo

* Dati provenienti dal Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volume

Una gamma più ampia di opportunità lavorative rispetto ad altre professioni

A partire dal 2023 c'erano 111.170 persone impiegate come 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' negli Stati Uniti.

Questo rappresenta circa il 0,07% della forza lavoro impiegata in tutto il paese

In altre parole, circa 1 su 1 mille persone sono impiegate come 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'.

Descrizione del lavoro

Pianifica e progetta strutture, come residenze private, edifici per uffici, teatri, fabbriche e altre proprietà strutturali.

SOC Code: 17-1011.00

Commenti (24)

Lascia un commento
Sawyer (Basso)
10 set 2024 22:41
It needs to pour your soul into it to really make a breakthrough. Robots don't have souls
sama
23 dic 2022 19:30
An architect is more than a concept or a few words. It's about thinking, conceptualizing, and making it a reality.
Michael E. (Basso)
08 dic 2025 01:00
A low chance for full automation of the profession itself because of the significant risk to human health, safety, and welfare involved -- people are generally less willing to accept a computer program as the ultimate responsible party for their safety. However, a high chance for partial automation of certain aspects of the profession, especially repetitive low-risk tasks such as detail selection (from a library of previously drawn details, not freshly AI-generated ones) and high-volume design iterations.
x (Basso)
27 nov 2025 10:54
law. someone needs to be responsible financially and legally for the outcome and possible mistakes + some projects [military] are secret and even cannot be made on computer with internet
oscar walker (Nessuna possibilità)
02 apr 2025 00:59
blend of creativity and problem solving to design spaces that align with the environment surrounding. Very low to no chance of being replaced by robots and AI in comparison to other industries.
Ben Bailey (Incerto)
21 feb 2024 21:15
I would love to have AI assist in automating the aspects of Architecture that are tedious, like making sure everything is up to code or automatically adjusting things after moving something else, but I fear that people will become lazy and let AI do the job for them.
Yoshimata R
25 apr 2023 17:55
This will not be popular, but our firm already uses AI: clients type in or speak their ideas and examples The programs we use come up with a myriad of solutions that the clients themselves can then configure and reconfigure at will with all structural processes, including loadbearing etc. built-in throughout the process. 16 of the 38 people at our firm have been laid off since this started.
:))) (Moderato)
03 ago 2022 00:16
Currently, as a student at one of the top architecture schools, I can observe how the most successful students utilize AI. It's clear to see how it improves their workflow and design progress, even as early as 2022.

Already, AI can handle most of the work for an architect. I believe that the next 20 years will further popularize AI within the profession, reducing the amount of work done manually.
Sebastian from Argentina (Basso)
14 nov 2019 12:33
Creativity from architects mind couldn't be replaced by AI, But some typical architecture room plans, could be systematized by machine learning on cad programs, like actual libraries of equipment, it could be library of rooms, baths, etc.
Lilly (Basso)
12 ago 2019 22:55
I think it would be quite hard for robots to take clients ideas for architecture and turn it into a floorplan since there are billions of ways to build a house.
David J Gill
24 apr 2019 22:43
More effective design software will raise productivity and reduce the number of staff required to complete project documents.
Marta (Incerto)
15 feb 2023 23:56
I totally agree. Students and young professionals may have problem with finding a job. Nowadays, they usually do repetitive CAD drawings/models (the main concept was designed by e.g. senior architect), and it all can be automated, especially with BIM
Dean B
26 mar 2019 03:54
This is an art form that’s practical so I don’t see it going
Mark (Nessuna possibilità)
08 lug 2024 18:20
There is no possible way for AI to take over architecture. To start, a computer cannot hold legal liability. AI doesn’t create; it only copies and reproduces. On a regular basis, my job requires unique solutions and details that cannot be pulled from other sources.

We need to take too many unrelated factors into account for any particular design, versus the cost and time it would take for an AI to be developed to take the job. It would never be profitable for the AI developer. Besides, they wouldn't want the liability risk we have for a mistake that can cost lives.
HMS (Nessuna possibilità)
15 mar 2023 06:49
Architects are a lot like an artist. AI cannot create cannot something that requires human originality. No two architects are the same, just as two pieces of art are not the same. Architecture requires you to put creativity, originality, emotion, and the social aspect into your work.
J (Incerto)
15 ott 2019 03:22
Depends on the kind of architecture, the way that the industry itself thinks about what architecture means (an engineering/optimization problem versus art, desire to rapidly customize vs work on the process with other humans) and what clients demand.
pgm777
29 ago 2019 12:26
computerisation will help and not hinder the architectural profession. Automisation is something that has no place
Mark (Incerto)
02 mag 2023 19:29
Until recently (through March and April 2023), and after having seen the work that Dall-e 2 had produced, I thought it incredibly likely. The argument that architects would still be required seemed to hinge on "you need to interface with a human to get a building built", but I don't think that's true (if a client could save tens of thousands of dollars by inputting their requests on a keyboard, rather than talking to a person, they'd opt for the latter). However, the one aspect of the job that's overlooked is LIABILITY. Currently architects are legally liable for the work they produce, and any failings over that work. AI offers no LIABILITY -- and I highly doubt the software design companies who are producing that AI are willing to accept liability -- and until someone, or a team of someones, is willing to accept that legal responsibility, AI shouldn't be able to threaten that job. However, I said "could go either way" because it's highly possible that people are so stupid, that they would sign a contract that frees the AI architect of liability if it meant they could save a few dollars on fees.
phamiliar
08 mar 2024 20:19
It is likely that AI could be the architectural designer and code checker while a civil engineer is responsible for the life and safety of the overall design. I think the job won't necessarily go away its just that there will be many production staff jobs that will be eliminated.
king rocker (Molto probabile)
24 feb 2022 14:51
LOL it's already dead. Almost no one hires architects now, there are so many tools that already do their job. Wake up, it's game over for this one. The site is way behind the times.
I'dRatherNotInputAName (Nessuna possibilità)
27 ott 2023 20:41
"LOL it's already dead."
Source? Or did it come to you in a dream?
Sameer
29 feb 2024 12:01
AI isn’t that capable to satisfy the client with the structure design… however it could help to make the work easy but it can’t overtake the profession.
Aleksandra (Moderato)
17 mag 2023 14:43
Projects' created by humans will be for the 1% of richest people who will have a fantasy and need to show off that their projects was done the "expensive way" by a human and not 80/20 rule by AI. What people don't understand is that atm 80% of society is more faulty than AI. Working with AI is a bliss comparing to working with a majority of employees as well as moody specialists on the market is simply a bliss. And we're only starting here...
Architect Downow
10 feb 2023 14:34
Architectural and Interior Design are both iterative processes.
AI will improve this process, detail all the structural draws, and create layouts and floorplans more efficiently than ever.

With solar, water, food and waste visions that now only a few architects embrace in projects.
Leed will be integrated in AI and civil engineering as well.

I guess in the future, anyone can design a house with the help of AI.

Architects, Lawyers and Doctors, the tríade of "good money" will fall.
And me and my boys are working to achieve this as soon as possible.


Lascia un commento su questa professione
0/8000