Écrivains et Auteurs
Vous voulez ce résumé sur votre site? Code d'intégration :
Risque d'automatisation
Risque Modéré (41-60%) : Les professions présentant un risque modéré d'automatisation impliquent généralement des tâches routinières mais nécessitent toujours un certain jugement et interaction humains.
Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.
Impact of Chat GPT on this occupation
We've received many comments and emails about Chat GPT and it's impact on this occupation. It's very impressive software, so people are understandably worried and/or excited.
However, something important to note with regards to the score we've calculated here, is that this occupation is comprised of many different types of job roles. Some examples of these include Advertising Writer, Blurb Writer, Copywriter and Screenwriter.
Some roles/tasks are more susceptible than other's to being automated by Chat GPT, but the score we've calculated is one that's an amalgamation of all of them.
Unfortunately, the source for our data (o*net) doesn't split this category up to the individual roles, so we can't calculate a score for each of them. If they do at some point in the future, we'll do the same, and generate scores accordingly.
Writing occupations aren't dead, but they are changing, so the best advice we can offer is to keep up to date with the latest developments, and use the tools available to your advantage.
Sondage utilisateur
Nos visiteurs ont voté qu'il y a peu de chances que cette profession soit automatisée. Cette évaluation est davantage soutenue par le niveau de risque d'automatisation calculé, qui estime 49% de chances d'automatisation.
Que pensez-vous du risque de l'automatisation?
Quelle est la probabilité que Écrivains et Auteurs soit remplacé par des robots ou l'intelligence artificielle dans les 20 prochaines années ?
Sentiment
Le(s) graphique(s) suivant(s) sont inclus là où il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour fournir des données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages des utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.
Sentiment au fil du temps (trimestriel)
Sentiment au fil du temps (annuellement)
Croissance
On s'attend à ce que le nombre de postes vacants pour 'Writers and Authors' augmente 4,1% d'ici 2032
Emploi total, et estimations des offres d'emploi
Les prévisions mises à jour sont attendues 09-2023.
Salaires
En 2022, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Writers and Authors' était de 73 150 $, soit 35 $ par heure.
'Writers and Authors' ont été payés 58,0% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 46 310 $
Salaires au fil du temps
Volume
À partir de 2022, il y avait 54 010 personnes employées en tant que 'Writers and Authors' aux États-Unis.
Cela représente environ < 0,001% de la main-d'œuvre employée à travers le pays
Autrement dit, environ 1 personne sur 2 mille est employée en tant que 'Writers and Authors'.
Description du poste
Produire et préparer du matériel écrit, tels que des scripts, des histoires, des publicités et d'autres matériaux.
SOC Code: 27-3043.00
Ressources
Will Chat GPT spell the end of blogging?
Here's a very informative video from Ricky Kesler from Income School about Chat GPT as it relates to blogging (and SEO). We think it contains great advice, and can be applied to all sorts of writing job roles, not just bloggers.
Si vous envisagez de commencer une nouvelle carrière ou de changer de travail, nous avons créé un outil de recherche d'emploi pratique qui pourrait vous aider à décrocher ce nouveau poste parfait.
Les gens ont également vu
Commentaires
Laissez un commentaire
Personally, I would hate to see the art of storytelling to be turned over to machines.
ChatGPT is not going to write things that people care about. This isn't because chatgpt is a bad writer - it's because people primarily consume written content because of the person behind it. Since the dawn of the internet, and even before, there have been an infinite number of takes, a vast supply of content. Yet, somehow, people still pay for newspapers, and substacks, and books, and all sorts of things that are seemingly available for free with just a Google search. It's because of the particulars of that person's perspective, not just "story good" or "take good."
There are already far more failed writers than successful ones, and far more failed "in the style of" works than actual successful works. What AI will do is simply raise the stakes for what it takes to be a successful writer or author, since it establishes a baseline commodity. However, that baseline is already very, very high.
it's not gonna replace real writers yet but it is coming like winter.
Humans are still the best storytellers.
Personally I went into this field because I absolutely thought I could write better than the average book, and that the "cream will rise to the top". I still believe this is true.
Where I get worried is if AI can learn to write fiction really well. Can an AI in 10 years learn beyond what it is taught (fed average books) and create amazing stories? That's what really scares me.
Will people want to read a story written by an AI or will people want to read stories written by humans? There's an element of detachment when reading AI writing and the uncanny valley effect might take hold when we read an AI trying to present human emotions through character. We will know - whoever put those words down did not understand them and they will have less meaning. Or will they? If they make sense they make sense. If it has emotional impact it has emotional impact - even if that was replicated through pulp learning and mastered through engagement scores.
Scary times to be a writer - to have any job. But this was always my dream and so I know deep down there's no chance I'll give up on it. Even if I can only build two thousand loyal readers, that is enough to make a living, and I'll do that through being very very human and marketing myself face first.
Laissez un commentaire sur cette profession