Enseignants du secondaire, sauf éducation spéciale et technique/professionnelle
Les gens ont également vu
Risque d'automatisation calculé
Risque Minimal (0-20%) : Les professions dans cette catégorie ont une faible probabilité d'être automatisées, car elles exigent généralement une résolution complexe de problèmes, de la créativité, de solides compétences interpersonnelles et un haut degré de dextérité manuelle. Ces emplois impliquent souvent des mouvements de main complexes et une coordination précise, rendant difficile pour les machines de reproduire les tâches requises.
Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.
Sondage utilisateur
Nos visiteurs ont voté qu'il y a peu de chances que cette profession soit automatisée. Cette évaluation est davantage soutenue par le niveau de risque d'automatisation calculé, qui estime 16% de chances d'automatisation.
Que pensez-vous du risque de l'automatisation?
Quelle est la probabilité que Enseignants du secondaire, sauf éducation spéciale et technique/professionnelle soit remplacé par des robots ou l'intelligence artificielle dans les 20 prochaines années ?
Sentiment
Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.
Sentiment au fil du temps (annuellement)
Croissance
On s'attend à ce que le nombre d'offres d'emploi pour 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' diminue 0,6% d'ici 2033
Emploi total, et estimations des offres d'emploi
Les prévisions mises à jour sont attendues 09-2024.
Salaires
En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' était de 65 220 $, soit 31 $ par heure.
'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' ont été payés 35,7% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 48 060 $
Salaires au fil du temps
Volume
À partir de 2023, il y avait 1 045 170 personnes employées en tant que 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' aux États-Unis.
Cela représente environ 0,7% de la main-d'œuvre employée à travers le pays
Autrement dit, environ 1 personne sur 145 est employée en tant que 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education'.
Description du poste
Enseigner une ou plusieurs matières aux élèves du niveau secondaire.
SOC Code: 25-2031.00
Ressources
Si vous envisagez de commencer une nouvelle carrière ou de changer de travail, nous avons créé un outil de recherche d'emploi pratique qui pourrait vous aider à décrocher ce nouveau poste parfait.
Commentaires
Leave a comment
Learning with a teacher can mean a number of scenarios, including utilizing the learning software you mentioned.
The assurance of having someone who knows more than you, or at least knows where to find answers and explain them, will result in teachers have a very secure job.
I haven't even mentioned the emotional support and connection that makes a learning environment better, something I don't foresee AI replacing because seeing assuring words pop up on my screen is not the same as hearing it from a teacher, who is making eye contact with me and using body language.
Due to remote learning and using similar designs that you mentioned, we have seen a 210% spike in high school drop outs, a 600% up shot of kids having at least 2-3 failing grades, and a gap between students who do not have access to tutors, internet or computers (or all three). A robot cannot tell an elementary student to reengage their students, let alone the sheer horror of classroom discipline being thrown out. Also, lets be real honest with secondary students, if they are given a generic problem trust me they will plagiarize and copy that down (just look at quizlet, or "write my paper" for proof). A human being needs to see if a student "gets" what is going on. A Teacher needs to have group interactions (and trust me you cannot do any sort of interactions with remote even with current programs- students just shut their cameras and mute themselves). Unless you are suggesting that a "few" will benefit from this dystopia, if so thank you Nancy Devos for your insight, but we educate everyone, and not the 1%.
Do you think the software being used led to those changes or the pandemic and economic downturn itself?
Easy to pass judgment when you have already drawn your conclusions. I've taught off and on since 2008 (mostly on, mostly secondary). Quizlet is the worst example you could provide of instructional technology we could employ to help all students.
When you discuss the one percent, you highlight a certain security the wealthy have that leads to less interruptions of education and that's a fair point. But I am not trying to describe a dystopia, but rather a better way to differentiate and tailor student learning to their particular needs, desires, strengths, and weaknesses.
Much of what effective teachers do is driven by inputs, points of data, about their students and their teaching. A properly designed system could analyze those inputs and apply strategies to intervene. It doesn't really matter the input, either.
Now that we are rolling out SEL technologies to help our kids, language translation applications that can help English learners, standards-based, interactively branching assessments and activities, the amount of information received is nothing trivial. The digital divide does truly make this a difficult prospect for some students, but that's not the question we are discussing here. Can teachers be replaced by "robots" in the future? Yes. Nothing would be more student-centred.
If the argument is about the socialization of students, that's not facilitated by teachers. It's actually stunted. Imagine learning plans that don't waste time with sages on stages. Imagine a truly adaptive system to check for understanding and intervene. Imagine that happening simultaneously for all students without the interruptions all teachers face daily just trying to teach. I realize virtual, and hybrid, learning did not go well for all students, but it was year one...something never attempted, and there was a society gone wild coupled with the inexperience of systems, personnel, and students.
I love teaching. I take it personally. But, if students were able to learn better from a robot than from me, I wouldn't take it personally. I'd celebrate it.
Laissez un commentaire sur cette profession