Scientifiques politiques

RISQUE D'AUTOMATISATION
CALCULÉ
31%
niveau de risque
SONDAGE
20,0%
Basé sur 344 votes
DEMANDE DE TRAVAIL
CROISSANCE
6,2%
par l'année 2032
SALAIRES
128 020 $
ou 61,54 $ par heure
Volume
5 660
à partir du 2022
RÉSUMÉ
SCORE DE TRAVAIL
7,2/10

Vous voulez ce résumé sur votre site? Code d'intégration :

Risque d'automatisation

31% (Risque Faible)

Risque Faible (21-40%) : Les emplois à ce niveau présentent un risque limité d'automatisation, car ils nécessitent un mélange de compétences techniques et centrées sur l'humain.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Certaines qualités assez importantes du travail sont difficiles à automatiser :

  • Perceptivité Sociale

  • Originalité

Sondage utilisateur

20,0% chance de pleine automatisation au cours des deux prochaines décennies

Nos visiteurs ont voté qu'il y a une chance minimale que cette profession soit automatisée. Cependant, le niveau de risque d'automatisation que nous avons généré suggère une probabilité plus élevée d'automatisation : 31% de chances d'automatisation.

Que pensez-vous du risque de l'automatisation?

Quelle est la probabilité que Scientifiques politiques soit remplacé par des robots ou l'intelligence artificielle dans les 20 prochaines années ?






Sentiment

Le(s) graphique(s) suivant(s) sont inclus là où il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour fournir des données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages des utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Sentiment au fil du temps (annuellement)

Croissance

Une croissance rapide par rapport à d'autres professions

On s'attend à ce que le nombre de postes vacants pour 'Political Scientists' augmente 6,2% d'ici 2032

Emploi total, et estimations des offres d'emploi

* Données de la Bureau of Labor Statistics pour la période entre 2021 et 2031
Les prévisions mises à jour sont attendues 09-2023.

Salaires

Très bien rémunéré par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2022, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Political Scientists' était de 128 020 $, soit 61 $ par heure.

'Political Scientists' ont été payés 176,4% de plus que le salaire médian national, qui était de 46 310 $

Salaires au fil du temps

* Données provenant du Bureau des Statistiques du Travail

Volume

Gamme d'opportunités d'emploi significativement inférieure par rapport à d'autres professions

À partir de 2022, il y avait 5 660 personnes employées en tant que 'Political Scientists' aux États-Unis.

Cela représente environ < 0,001% de la main-d'œuvre employée à travers le pays

Autrement dit, environ 1 personne sur 26 mille est employée en tant que 'Political Scientists'.

Description du poste

Étudiez l'origine, le développement et le fonctionnement des systèmes politiques. Vous pourriez étudier des sujets tels que l'opinion publique, la prise de décision politique et l'idéologie. Vous pourriez analyser la structure et le fonctionnement des gouvernements, ainsi que diverses entités politiques. Vous pourriez mener des sondages d'opinion publique, analyser les résultats des élections ou analyser des documents publics.

SOC Code: 19-3094.00

Ressources

Si vous envisagez de commencer une nouvelle carrière ou de changer de travail, nous avons créé un outil de recherche d'emploi pratique qui pourrait vous aider à décrocher ce nouveau poste parfait.

Recherchez des emplois dans votre région locale

Commentaires

Daniel xavier (Aucune chance) dit
Political science is not an exact science. there are thousands of variations that even with a lot of data a MACHINE, which is basically made of zeros and ones, would not be able to understand, including, for us to understand politics we need a perspective of the world that is not necessarily being glimpsed on the internet, because, after all, there are biases that the lens of social media makes us have, we basically become much more prone to fights on the internet than in real life, and, as far as we know, robots are only powered through the internet and data scientific.

and even in terms of scientific data, they cannot be used in their entirety to create a portrait of current politics, as there are ideas that only current affairs can provide. such as the change in mass media that stopped being through TV, radio and newspapers and moved completely, or partially, to the internet, another of these changes is the undeniable access to social networks. These changes are so important that they have changed the current political scenario in a significant way, but as I said previously, they do not demonstrate the totality of human relations, an issue that also has significant changes such as, for example, the rise of Fenism, the increase in the rights of populations to deny and native peoples, segregation and emancipation of gender choices and sexual options, these changes that are very important and significant for humanity in general, were somewhat forced into the algorithm internally, something that, recently in the few weeks before the publication on March 5, 2023 of this comment caused problems in images that contained falsifications and delusions of reality, such as an image that contained two women, including one black, in the American legislature in the 19th century, a time when not even women Not even black people participated directly in the US political system, that is, they did not vote and could not be voted for any political position.

in short, for a robot to be a political scientist, it would need to be within the bonds of social reality, that is, to be, living in the real world, to be outside the binary system, something that is literally impossible even with a quantum computer as it would return to the binary system because this is the universal basis of computing, not just being made up of databases and having a perspective created by your life experiences and never in any way trying to have an answer for everything, as this can generate machine delusions. That's not human-centrism on my part, it's just an observation of reality. Furthermore, it is worth adding that a being cannot create a being more intelligent than itself, it is a basic mathematical concept, that is, it is not the AI ​​that will become more intelligent than humans, it is the human being that will become more stupid every day.
Mar 05, 2024 at 09:23
Francisco (Aucune chance) dit
Politics are fundamentally human and unpredictable, it's not going to be dealt with or solved by mathematics or any computer program.
May 04, 2023 at 10:15
Galo (Très probable) dit
OpenAI has managed to now beat the lawyer bar exam with high precision, this improvement took place in the span of less than a year, with these changes, in a few years political theory could easily be replaced by AI based on gathered data of all political theory.
Mar 15, 2023 at 08:20
Milan dit
A lawyer is a pretty different job compared to a political scientist though. The big distinction is that lawyers make arguments based on laws and prior court cases. There is some novel and creative thinking in formation of arguments, but they are bound by the law. Politics is a much more human and sociologically based branch. Local politics can also be quite grassroots and not suitable for AI attempting to gather data or understand human responses.
Apr 26, 2024 at 01:40
Waka Waka (Faible) dit
I hate artificial intelligence.
Apr 20, 2021 at 01:39
Morpheus dit
If robots ever become aware enough to become politicians, you will likely see robot governments form and pretty quickly you basically have the story of The Animatrix, humans will just be enslaved after a long war and put into machines that will simulate the world.
Jul 05, 2019 at 03:17
Juan dit
A politician is not the same as a political scientist...
Oct 01, 2021 at 06:24
Anonymous (Aucune chance) dit
Political science is a concept that can only be interpreted and actually developed upon by human minds. Robots will not be able to perceive politics on such a scale that entire parliaments will be replaced or assisted by them, as robots tend to overlook major factors.
Apr 08, 2019 at 07:37
GPT3 dit
Transhumanism is becoming a reality every day, and robots are being trained to recognize complex patterns even better than humans.

Political information can be overwhelming, but advanced algorithms have the ability to process it faster and more accurately than any human.

There is no reason why we cannot replace or assist entire parliaments with robots and artificial intelligence, if we wish.
Jan 15, 2023 at 10:35
Darius Rashidi dit
You really can't use technology to replicate the mix of eerie neuroticism and ambiguous, vain narcissism required to make a true political scientist.
Apr 02, 2019 at 03:20

Laissez un commentaire sur cette profession

Ce site est protégé par reCAPTCHA et la Politique de Confidentialité et les Conditions d'Utilisation de Google s'appliquent.

Les gens ont également vu

Avocats
Programmeurs Informatiques
Comptables et Auditeurs
Enseignants de maternelle, d'élémentaire, de collège, de lycée et d'éducation spécialisée
Concepteurs graphiques