Photographes

Risque Faible
37%
Où souhaitez-vous aller ensuite ?
Partagez vos résultats avec vos amis et votre famille.
Ou, explorez cette profession en détail...
RISQUE D'AUTOMATISATION
CALCULÉ
34%
(Risque Faible)
SONDAGE
39%
(Risque Faible)
Average: 37%
DEMANDE DE TRAVAIL
CROISSANCE
3,9%
par l'année 2033
SALAIRES
40 760 $
ou 19,59 $ par heure
Volume
53 630
à partir du 2023
RÉSUMÉ
SCORE DE TRAVAIL
4,4/10

Les gens ont également vu

Risque d'automatisation calculé

34% (Risque Faible)

Risque Faible (21-40%) : Les emplois à ce niveau présentent un risque limité d'automatisation, car ils nécessitent un mélange de compétences techniques et centrées sur l'humain.

Plus d'informations sur ce que représente ce score et comment il est calculé sont disponibles ici.

Certaines qualités assez importantes du travail sont difficiles à automatiser :

  • Originalité

  • Beaux-Arts

  • Perceptivité Sociale

  • Dextérité manuelle

Sondage utilisateur

39% chance de pleine automatisation au cours des deux prochaines décennies

Nos visiteurs ont voté qu'il y a peu de chances que cette profession soit automatisée. Cette évaluation est davantage soutenue par le niveau de risque d'automatisation calculé, qui estime 34% de chances d'automatisation.

Que pensez-vous du risque de l'automatisation?

Quelle est la probabilité que Photographes soit remplacé par des robots ou l'intelligence artificielle dans les 20 prochaines années ?






Sentiment

Le graphique suivant est inclus chaque fois qu'il y a un nombre substantiel de votes pour rendre les données significatives. Ces représentations visuelles affichent les résultats des sondages utilisateurs au fil du temps, fournissant une indication significative des tendances de sentiment.

Sentiment au fil du temps (annuellement)

Croissance

Une croissance modérée par rapport à d'autres professions

On s'attend à ce que le nombre de postes vacants pour 'Photographers' augmente 3,9% d'ici 2033

Emploi total, et estimations des offres d'emploi

* Données de la Bureau of Labor Statistics pour la période entre 2021 et 2031
Les prévisions mises à jour sont attendues 09-2024.

Salaires

Très mal payé par rapport à d'autres professions

En 2023, le salaire annuel médian pour 'Photographers' était de 40 760 $, soit 19 $ par heure.

'Photographers' ont été payés 15,2% de moins que le salaire médian national, qui s'élevait à 48 060 $

Salaires au fil du temps

* Données provenant du Bureau des Statistiques du Travail

Volume

Gamme modérée d'opportunités d'emploi par rapport à d'autres professions

À partir de 2023, il y avait 53 630 personnes employées en tant que 'Photographers' aux États-Unis.

Cela représente environ < 0,001% de la main-d'œuvre employée à travers le pays

Autrement dit, environ 1 personne sur 2 mille est employée en tant que 'Photographers'.

Description du poste

Photographier des personnes, des paysages, des marchandises ou d'autres sujets. Peut utiliser du matériel d'éclairage pour améliorer l'apparence d'un sujet. Peut utiliser un logiciel de montage pour produire des images et des tirages finis. Comprend les photographes commerciaux et industriels, les photographes scientifiques et les photojournalistes.

SOC Code: 27-4021.00

Ressources

Si vous envisagez de commencer une nouvelle carrière ou de changer de travail, nous avons créé un outil de recherche d'emploi pratique qui pourrait vous aider à décrocher ce nouveau poste parfait.

Recherchez des emplois dans votre région locale

Commentaires

Leave a comment

Hasan Tahsin Cinbaş (Aucune chance) 2 months ago
A photographer captures what they want to convey, and this varies according to their emotional state and mood. Just like a writer or painter, they transfer their feelings into the photograph, and this is also a form of emotional expression.
0 0 Reply
Laurentiu Juravle (Faible) 7 months ago
I think that photography is a mix of emotion, talent, and technique. Sure, a robot can make a picture as beautiful as mine, but it can't capture the precious moments like a photographer.
1 0 Reply
Owen (Faible) 1 year ago
Humans taking photographs of the world is a much more accurate and valuable approach rather than having AI generated images etc. It's more authentic
1 0 Reply
Tomeu Ozonas (Très probable) 1 year ago
Product CGI plus Generative AI will supply most photographic needs, such as home decor and food. Stock images will be absorbed and or replaced by Generative AI. Blockchain digital watermarks can help to save some traditional artistic and commercial photography.
0 0 Reply
Laurel 1 year ago
I'm a photographer, and the photography industry is doomed. AI image generation technology already exists, so all that has to happen is for it to become mainstream enough to be cheap to produce and add to most smartphones. Not only will the image quality be better, but it can also produce multiple images at once. In fact, AI images can even be copyrighted in some countries. The worst part is that since photographers are not paid much, there will not be much motivation to save the industry.
1 2 Reply
Tacio Philip 2 years ago
A lot of photographers' jobs can easily be replaced by automated drones and some AI to select frames from a high-definition video. There's no secret or creativity in many photography jobs (almost all social events, products...).

And yes, I'm a professional photographer, but as Galileo told us, we are not the center of the universe. :-P
1 1 Reply
jenna talia (Très probable) 2 years ago
drones. drones will fly around and take pictures
0 1 Reply
Jo (Faible) 2 years ago
I think that a robot could take a photo if it was trained to, but it could never see beauty or creativity like a human.

For example, a robot could take photos with the correct settings and a cool angle, but a robot could never look at something and realize the true beauty and emotions that a human could feel.

So, a robot might take a photo with the correct ISO, AP, SP, and an angle that it has been programmed to look at. But never emotions because in the end, it's a machine.
1 0 Reply
jagbar (Très probable) 3 years ago
Already happening with AI photos
1 0 Reply
Abby (Aucune chance) 3 years ago
Robots could not take over the personal touch and creative ideas photographers use in every single shot. There is not programing that could replace a person for this job.
0 0 Reply
isuzu222 3 years ago
The only reason this won't be replaced by robots is because the pay is so low there is no real reason to actively try to replace the profession. Also, this is easily a hobby profession/'freelancing' and will continue to have its niche just like we still have people using the Polaroids for fun.
0 1 Reply
Derek 1 year ago
Cashiers will be replaced and they are paid even less.
0 1 Reply
Ryan (Très probable) 4 years ago
Several forms of photography, particularly product photography, have already been largely automated with locations where you can bring your product, place it in a lightbox set, and AI assists the (non-photographer) customer in taking a series of professionally lit product shots. They're quite effective, will be easy to expand to new locations. Many of the techniques will eventually be possible to extend to portrait photography as well.

AI algorithms are already deeply progressed in combing through google street view to crop and process landscape and urban photography according to classical composition standards. At this point, the primary limiting factor is the sample quality, but much of the principles used will be possible to extend to drones surveying scenic areas.

While the small field of fine art photography will likely be unaffected, the majority of commercial or stock applications of photography are very likely to be done "well enough" by automatization to satisfy the primary customers of the field.
0 0 Reply
Celso Ribeiro (Faible) 5 years ago
Atividade que envolve dinâmica com grande variação que não se prevê..e o fator determinante que o robô (IA) não vai atingir...a Sensibilidade Humana.
0 0 Reply
xenon2 (Modéré) 5 years ago
AI can measure photo quality and take "infinite" number of photos, then based on selection will select best shots.
Imagine ball with lenses floating around, then from 100k pictures 100 is selected, based on "rememberability" and other defined patterns trained from famous photographers.
0 0 Reply
Suffyim 2 years ago
I think one reason photography will not be entirely automated is because robots can't exactly be inspired by anything.

From the little experience I have, I know it takes more than being knowledgeable and aware of the techniques of photography to take a good photo. Sure, it plays a role, but you need to feel emotion from the image to know that it is a good photo.

An AI can't do that.
0 0 Reply
E 5 years ago
I think e-commerce photography that is very technical could be replaced by robots but from my experience, I think it very unlikely and hard to imagine that robots will do better than agency talents for editorial/creative photography
0 0 Reply

Laissez un commentaire sur cette profession

Ce site est protégé par reCAPTCHA et la Politique de Confidentialité et les Conditions d'Utilisation de Google s'appliquent.