Profesores de Escuela Secundaria (Excepto Educación Especial y Técnica/Profesional)
Las personas también vieron
Riesgo de automatización calculado
Riesgo Mínimo (0-20%): Las ocupaciones en esta categoría tienen una baja probabilidad de ser automatizadas, ya que generalmente requieren solución compleja de problemas, creatividad, fuertes habilidades interpersonales y un alto grado de destreza manual. Estos trabajos a menudo implican movimientos de manos intrincados y coordinación precisa, lo que dificulta que las máquinas repliquen las tareas requeridas.
Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.
Encuesta de usuarios
Nuestros visitantes han votado que hay una baja probabilidad de que esta ocupación se automatice. Esta evaluación se ve respaldada por el nivel de riesgo de automatización calculado, que estima una posibilidad del 16% de automatización.
¿Cuál crees que es el riesgo de la automatización?
¿Cuál es la probabilidad de que Profesores de Escuela Secundaria, Excepto Educación Especial y Técnica/Profesional sea reemplazado por robots o inteligencia artificial en los próximos 20 años?
Sentimiento
El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.
Sentimiento a lo largo del tiempo (anualmente)
Crecimiento
Se espera que el número de ofertas de trabajo para 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' disminuya 0,6% para 2033
Empleo total y estimaciones de vacantes laborales
Las proyecciones actualizadas se deben 09-2024.
Salarios
En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' fue de 65.220 $, o 31 $ por hora.
'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' recibieron un salario 35,7% más alto que el salario medio nacional, que se situó en 48.060 $
Salarios a lo largo del tiempo
Volumen
A partir de 2023, había 1.045.170 personas empleadas como 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education' dentro de los Estados Unidos.
Esto representa alrededor del 0,7% de la fuerza laboral empleada en todo el país.
Dicho de otra manera, alrededor de 1 de cada 145 personas están empleadas como 'Secondary School Teachers, Except Special and Career/Technical Education'.
Descripción del trabajo
Enseñar una o más materias a estudiantes de nivel secundario.
SOC Code: 25-2031.00
Recursos
Si estás pensando en comenzar una nueva carrera, o buscando cambiar de trabajo, hemos creado una útil herramienta de búsqueda de empleo que podría ayudarte a conseguir ese nuevo rol perfecto.
Comentarios
Leave a comment
Learning with a teacher can mean a number of scenarios, including utilizing the learning software you mentioned.
The assurance of having someone who knows more than you, or at least knows where to find answers and explain them, will result in teachers have a very secure job.
I haven't even mentioned the emotional support and connection that makes a learning environment better, something I don't foresee AI replacing because seeing assuring words pop up on my screen is not the same as hearing it from a teacher, who is making eye contact with me and using body language.
Due to remote learning and using similar designs that you mentioned, we have seen a 210% spike in high school drop outs, a 600% up shot of kids having at least 2-3 failing grades, and a gap between students who do not have access to tutors, internet or computers (or all three). A robot cannot tell an elementary student to reengage their students, let alone the sheer horror of classroom discipline being thrown out. Also, lets be real honest with secondary students, if they are given a generic problem trust me they will plagiarize and copy that down (just look at quizlet, or "write my paper" for proof). A human being needs to see if a student "gets" what is going on. A Teacher needs to have group interactions (and trust me you cannot do any sort of interactions with remote even with current programs- students just shut their cameras and mute themselves). Unless you are suggesting that a "few" will benefit from this dystopia, if so thank you Nancy Devos for your insight, but we educate everyone, and not the 1%.
Do you think the software being used led to those changes or the pandemic and economic downturn itself?
Easy to pass judgment when you have already drawn your conclusions. I've taught off and on since 2008 (mostly on, mostly secondary). Quizlet is the worst example you could provide of instructional technology we could employ to help all students.
When you discuss the one percent, you highlight a certain security the wealthy have that leads to less interruptions of education and that's a fair point. But I am not trying to describe a dystopia, but rather a better way to differentiate and tailor student learning to their particular needs, desires, strengths, and weaknesses.
Much of what effective teachers do is driven by inputs, points of data, about their students and their teaching. A properly designed system could analyze those inputs and apply strategies to intervene. It doesn't really matter the input, either.
Now that we are rolling out SEL technologies to help our kids, language translation applications that can help English learners, standards-based, interactively branching assessments and activities, the amount of information received is nothing trivial. The digital divide does truly make this a difficult prospect for some students, but that's not the question we are discussing here. Can teachers be replaced by "robots" in the future? Yes. Nothing would be more student-centred.
If the argument is about the socialization of students, that's not facilitated by teachers. It's actually stunted. Imagine learning plans that don't waste time with sages on stages. Imagine a truly adaptive system to check for understanding and intervene. Imagine that happening simultaneously for all students without the interruptions all teachers face daily just trying to teach. I realize virtual, and hybrid, learning did not go well for all students, but it was year one...something never attempted, and there was a society gone wild coupled with the inexperience of systems, personnel, and students.
I love teaching. I take it personally. But, if students were able to learn better from a robot than from me, I wouldn't take it personally. I'd celebrate it.
Deja una respuesta sobre esta ocupación