Fotógrafos

Riesgo Bajo
37%
¿A dónde te gustaría ir a continuación?
Comparte tus resultados con amigos y familiares.
O, Explora Esta Profesión en Mayor Detalle...
RIESGO DE AUTOMATIZACIÓN
CALCULADO
34%
(Riesgo Bajo)
ENCUESTANDO
39%
(Riesgo Bajo)
Average: 37%
DEMANDA DE TRABAJO
CRECIMIENTO
3,9%
para el año 2033
SALARIOS
40.760 $
o 19,59 $ por hora
Volumen
53.630
a partir de 2023
RESUMEN
PUNTUACIÓN DE EMPLEO
4,4/10

Las personas también vieron

Riesgo de automatización calculado

34% (Riesgo Bajo)

Riesgo Bajo (21-40%): Los trabajos en este nivel tienen un riesgo limitado de automatización, ya que requieren una combinación de habilidades técnicas y centradas en el ser humano.

Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.

Algunas cualidades bastante importantes del trabajo son difíciles de automatizar:

  • Originalidad

  • Bellas Artes

  • Percepción Social

  • Destreza Manual

Encuesta de usuarios

39% posibilidad de automatización completa en las próximas dos décadas

Nuestros visitantes han votado que hay una baja probabilidad de que esta ocupación se automatice. Esta evaluación se ve respaldada por el nivel de riesgo de automatización calculado, que estima una posibilidad del 34% de automatización.

¿Cuál crees que es el riesgo de la automatización?

¿Cuál es la probabilidad de que Fotógrafos sea reemplazado por robots o inteligencia artificial en los próximos 20 años?






Sentimiento

El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.

Sentimiento a lo largo del tiempo (anualmente)

Crecimiento

Crecimiento moderado en relación con otras profesiones

Se espera que el número de ofertas de trabajo para 'Photographers' aumente 3,9% para 2033

Empleo total y estimaciones de vacantes laborales

* Datos de la Oficina de Estadísticas Laborales para el período entre 2021 y 2031
Las proyecciones actualizadas se deben 09-2024.

Salarios

Muy mal pagado en comparación con otras profesiones

En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Photographers' fue de 40.760 $, o 19 $ por hora.

'Photographers' recibieron un salario 15,2% más bajo que el salario medio nacional, que se situaba en 48.060 $

Salarios a lo largo del tiempo

* Datos de la Oficina de Estadísticas Laborales

Volumen

Rango moderado de oportunidades laborales en comparación con otras profesiones

A partir de 2023, había 53.630 personas empleadas como 'Photographers' dentro de los Estados Unidos.

Esto representa alrededor del < 0,001% de la fuerza laboral empleada en todo el país.

Dicho de otra manera, alrededor de 1 de cada 2 mil personas están empleadas como 'Photographers'.

Descripción del trabajo

Fotografía de personas, paisajes, mercancías u otros sujetos. Puede utilizar equipos de iluminación para mejorar la apariencia de un sujeto. Puede usar software de edición para producir imágenes y copias terminadas. Incluye fotógrafos comerciales e industriales, fotógrafos científicos y fotoperiodistas.

SOC Code: 27-4021.00

Recursos

Si estás pensando en comenzar una nueva carrera, o buscando cambiar de trabajo, hemos creado una útil herramienta de búsqueda de empleo que podría ayudarte a conseguir ese nuevo rol perfecto.

Busca empleos en tu área local

Comentarios

Leave a comment

Hasan Tahsin Cinbaş (Sin posibilidad) 2 months ago
A photographer captures what they want to convey, and this varies according to their emotional state and mood. Just like a writer or painter, they transfer their feelings into the photograph, and this is also a form of emotional expression.
0 0 Reply
Laurentiu Juravle (Bajo) 7 months ago
I think that photography is a mix of emotion, talent, and technique. Sure, a robot can make a picture as beautiful as mine, but it can't capture the precious moments like a photographer.
1 0 Reply
Owen (Bajo) 1 year ago
Humans taking photographs of the world is a much more accurate and valuable approach rather than having AI generated images etc. It's more authentic
1 0 Reply
Tomeu Ozonas (Muy probablemente) 1 year ago
Product CGI plus Generative AI will supply most photographic needs, such as home decor and food. Stock images will be absorbed and or replaced by Generative AI. Blockchain digital watermarks can help to save some traditional artistic and commercial photography.
0 0 Reply
Laurel 1 year ago
I'm a photographer, and the photography industry is doomed. AI image generation technology already exists, so all that has to happen is for it to become mainstream enough to be cheap to produce and add to most smartphones. Not only will the image quality be better, but it can also produce multiple images at once. In fact, AI images can even be copyrighted in some countries. The worst part is that since photographers are not paid much, there will not be much motivation to save the industry.
1 2 Reply
Tacio Philip 2 years ago
A lot of photographers' jobs can easily be replaced by automated drones and some AI to select frames from a high-definition video. There's no secret or creativity in many photography jobs (almost all social events, products...).

And yes, I'm a professional photographer, but as Galileo told us, we are not the center of the universe. :-P
1 1 Reply
jenna talia (Muy probablemente) 2 years ago
drones. drones will fly around and take pictures
0 1 Reply
Jo (Bajo) 2 years ago
I think that a robot could take a photo if it was trained to, but it could never see beauty or creativity like a human.

For example, a robot could take photos with the correct settings and a cool angle, but a robot could never look at something and realize the true beauty and emotions that a human could feel.

So, a robot might take a photo with the correct ISO, AP, SP, and an angle that it has been programmed to look at. But never emotions because in the end, it's a machine.
1 0 Reply
jagbar (Muy probablemente) 3 years ago
Already happening with AI photos
1 0 Reply
Abby (Sin posibilidad) 3 years ago
Robots could not take over the personal touch and creative ideas photographers use in every single shot. There is not programing that could replace a person for this job.
0 0 Reply
isuzu222 3 years ago
The only reason this won't be replaced by robots is because the pay is so low there is no real reason to actively try to replace the profession. Also, this is easily a hobby profession/'freelancing' and will continue to have its niche just like we still have people using the Polaroids for fun.
0 1 Reply
Derek 1 year ago
Cashiers will be replaced and they are paid even less.
0 1 Reply
Ryan (Muy probablemente) 4 years ago
Several forms of photography, particularly product photography, have already been largely automated with locations where you can bring your product, place it in a lightbox set, and AI assists the (non-photographer) customer in taking a series of professionally lit product shots. They're quite effective, will be easy to expand to new locations. Many of the techniques will eventually be possible to extend to portrait photography as well.

AI algorithms are already deeply progressed in combing through google street view to crop and process landscape and urban photography according to classical composition standards. At this point, the primary limiting factor is the sample quality, but much of the principles used will be possible to extend to drones surveying scenic areas.

While the small field of fine art photography will likely be unaffected, the majority of commercial or stock applications of photography are very likely to be done "well enough" by automatization to satisfy the primary customers of the field.
0 0 Reply
Celso Ribeiro (Bajo) 5 years ago
Atividade que envolve dinâmica com grande variação que não se prevê..e o fator determinante que o robô (IA) não vai atingir...a Sensibilidade Humana.
0 0 Reply
xenon2 (Moderado) 5 years ago
AI can measure photo quality and take "infinite" number of photos, then based on selection will select best shots.
Imagine ball with lenses floating around, then from 100k pictures 100 is selected, based on "rememberability" and other defined patterns trained from famous photographers.
0 0 Reply
Suffyim 2 years ago
I think one reason photography will not be entirely automated is because robots can't exactly be inspired by anything.

From the little experience I have, I know it takes more than being knowledgeable and aware of the techniques of photography to take a good photo. Sure, it plays a role, but you need to feel emotion from the image to know that it is a good photo.

An AI can't do that.
0 0 Reply
E 5 years ago
I think e-commerce photography that is very technical could be replaced by robots but from my experience, I think it very unlikely and hard to imagine that robots will do better than agency talents for editorial/creative photography
0 0 Reply

Deja una respuesta sobre esta ocupación

Este sitio está protegido por reCAPTCHA y se aplican la Política de Privacidad y los Términos de Servicio de Google.