Geocientíficos, excepto hidrólogos y geógrafos

20% (Riesgo Mínimo)

Riesgo Mínimo (0-20%): Las ocupaciones en esta categoría tienen una baja probabilidad de ser automatizadas, ya que generalmente requieren solución compleja de problemas, creatividad, fuertes habilidades interpersonales y un alto grado de destreza manual. Estos trabajos a menudo implican movimientos de manos intrincados y coordinación precisa, lo que dificulta que las máquinas repliquen las tareas requeridas.

Más información sobre qué es esta puntuación y cómo se calcula está disponible aquí.

Encuesta de usuarios

Sentimiento

El siguiente gráfico se incluye siempre que haya una cantidad sustancial de votos para generar datos significativos. Estas representaciones visuales muestran los resultados de las encuestas de usuarios a lo largo del tiempo, proporcionando una indicación importante de las tendencias de sentimiento.

Salarios

Bien remunerado en comparación con otras profesiones

En 2023, el salario anual mediano para 'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers' fue de 92.580 $, o 44 $ por hora.

'Geoscientists, Except Hydrologists and Geographers' recibieron un salario 92,6% más alto que el salario medio nacional, que se situó en 48.060 $

Salarios a lo largo del tiempo

Comentarios

Nonono (Bajo) 5 days ago

There are some tasks than could be automated, but AI is still inaccurate and incomplete. Geoscientists need to incorporate knowledge and skills from several different disciplines within geoscience.

0 0 Reply

Ajdin (Bajo) 5 months ago

Whilst AI or just simply computers play a crucial role in the industry, the human factor is definitely here to stay

0 0 Reply

N.M. (Bajo) 5 months ago

It requires doing things that I believe robots will not be advanced enough to do in 20 years.

0 0 Reply

Eliana (Sin posibilidad) 1 year ago

to be a geoscientist you need to travel in the field, collect rocks, analyze sequences, understand and interpret what are you seeing. Maybe AI can help, but you really need to build a full terminator to replace a geologist.

1 0 Reply

Rui Bernardino (Sin posibilidad) 1 year ago

Geologists don't work with numbers, they work with human common sense, theoretical geology ofen doesn't apply in the real world, so you can program a robot that knows everything and it will be dumbfounded when it finds a yellow basalt (yes they exist). Some tasks we do may be automated, sutch as calculations and rock thin section descriptions, that will only allow us to be more productive and focous on the aspects that really matter. There is no replacement for human geometric thinking and thus no way geologists will be replaced by robots

0 0 Reply

Moyin Ade 3 years ago

As a student Geologist I agree but I think you’ll still need a Geologist to program the robot. Even in Car manufacturing assembly line still has engineers. Correct/advise me if I’m wrong.👍

0 0 Reply

Faisal Ali 4 years ago

When your talking about a (Geologist) this occupation isn't really going to be ''automated'' cause' this work needs to be done by a human not really by computerized bots. I disagree with that but let's say an archaeologist place it'll be possible to replace the work of an archaeologist by AI cause recently AI has discovered some archaeological data that was yrs ago.

I believe that this occupation will still live. It will not most likely be taken by AI I'm 100% confident.

0 0 Reply

E 5 years ago

Paleontologists probably not. While robots can have extreme precision, humans can see things which AI programs can't

0 0 Reply

leo 4 years ago

AI can see things that human can't see, not the opposite.

0 0 Reply