Physiker

Minimales Risiko
11%
Wohin möchten Sie als Nächstes gehen?
Teilen Sie Ihre Ergebnisse mit Freunden und Familie.
Oder erkunden Sie diesen Beruf ausführlicher...
AUTOMATISIERUNGSRISIKO
BERECHNET
0,6%
(Minimales Risiko)
UMFRAGE
22%
(Geringes Risiko)
Average: 11%
ARBEITSNACHFRAGE
WACHSTUM
7,2%
bis zum Jahr 2033
LÖHNE
155.680 $
oder 74,84 $ pro Stunde
Volumen
18.350
ab dem 2023
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG
ARBEITSPUNKTZAHL
8,3/10

Personen haben sich auch angesehen

Berechnetes Automatisierungsrisiko

0,6% (Minimales Risiko)

Minimales Risiko (0-20%): Berufe in dieser Kategorie haben eine geringe Wahrscheinlichkeit, automatisiert zu werden, da sie in der Regel komplexe Problemlösungen, Kreativität, starke zwischenmenschliche Fähigkeiten und ein hohes Maß an manueller Geschicklichkeit erfordern. Diese Jobs beinhalten oft komplexe Handbewegungen und präzise Koordination, was es für Maschinen schwierig macht, die erforderlichen Aufgaben zu replizieren.

Weitere Informationen darüber, was dieser Wert ist und wie er berechnet wird, sind verfügbar hier.

Einige sehr wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Originalität

Einige ziemlich wichtige Eigenschaften des Jobs sind schwer zu automatisieren:

  • Soziale Wahrnehmungsfähigkeit

  • Überzeugung

Benutzerumfrage

22% Chance auf vollständige Automatisierung in den nächsten zwei Jahrzehnten

Unsere Besucher haben abgestimmt, dass es eine geringe Chance gibt, dass dieser Beruf automatisiert wird. Diese Einschätzung wird weiterhin durch das berechnete Automatisierungsrisiko unterstützt, welches eine 0,6% Chance der Automatisierung schätzt.

Was denken Sie, ist das Risiko der Automatisierung?

Wie hoch ist die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass Physiker in den nächsten 20 Jahren durch Roboter oder künstliche Intelligenz ersetzt wird?






Gefühl

Das folgende Diagramm wird überall dort eingefügt, wo eine beträchtliche Anzahl von Stimmen vorliegt, um aussagekräftige Daten darzustellen. Diese visuellen Darstellungen zeigen die Ergebnisse von Nutzerumfragen im Laufe der Zeit und geben einen wichtigen Hinweis auf Stimmungstrends.

Gefühlslage über die Zeit (jährlich)

Wachstum

Schnelles Wachstum im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Die Anzahl der 'Physicists' Stellenangebote wird voraussichtlich um 7,2% bis 2033 steigen.

Gesamtbeschäftigung und geschätzte Stellenangebote

* Daten des Bureau of Labor Statistics für den Zeitraum zwischen 2021 und 2031
Aktualisierte Prognosen sind fällig 09-2024.

Löhne

Sehr hoch bezahlt im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Im Jahr 2023 betrug das mittlere Jahresgehalt für 'Physicists' 155.680 $, oder 74 $ pro Stunde.

'Physicists' wurden 223,9% höher bezahlt als der nationale Medianlohn, der bei 48.060 $ lag.

Löhne über die Zeit

* Daten vom Bureau of Labor Statistics

Volumen

Geringeres Spektrum an Arbeitsmöglichkeiten im Vergleich zu anderen Berufen

Ab dem 2023 waren 18.350 Personen als 'Physicists' in den Vereinigten Staaten beschäftigt.

Dies entspricht etwa < 0,001% der erwerbstätigen Bevölkerung im ganzen Land.

Anders ausgedrückt, ist etwa 1 von 8 Tausend Personen als 'Physicists' beschäftigt.

Stellenbeschreibung

Führen Sie Forschungen zu physikalischen Phänomenen durch, entwickeln Sie Theorien auf der Grundlage von Beobachtungen und Experimenten und erarbeiten Sie Methoden zur Anwendung physikalischer Gesetze und Theorien.

SOC Code: 19-2012.00

Ressourcen

Wenn Sie darüber nachdenken, eine neue Karriere zu beginnen oder den Job zu wechseln, haben wir ein praktisches Tool für die Jobsuche erstellt, das Ihnen möglicherweise dabei hilft, die perfekte neue Rolle zu finden.

Suchen Sie Jobs in Ihrer lokalen Umgebung

Kommentare

Leave a comment

Guest 17 days ago
AI already taking over math (in summer 2024 AI reached silver medal at IMO) so I think physics is next in order to be replaced and automated... So math and physics very related to each other so there no chance for both of them
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (Niedrig) 2 months ago
Honestly, robots only have have so much processing power, and with today’s tech, (and possibly tomorrow’s) it’s just not possible to run such complex calculations.
0 0 Reply
E (Keine Chance) 2 months ago
Physics requires complex models and creativity that artificial intelligence can not replicate without a human mind.
0 0 Reply
Oliver Cavendish 2 months ago
differentiating between experimental and theoretical physicists, i think that there is a chance that experimental physics will be replaced by automation in the near future especially as nuclear engineering also comes under this bracket and the militaries of major world powers such as America, China and India are looking to incorporate more cyber-warfare and robotics into their offensive (and defensive) technologies and there is also a high chance that as other fields like chemistry, for example, begin to get automated, experimental physics will too. but theoretical physics, on the other hand, is the purest discipline of science there is. it requires originality, innovation, creativity, fun, a genuine interest in science and physics for its own sake and the ability to make coherent theories and hypotheses based on observations and data gathered of and from natural phenomena. this, at least in the near future, is something that AI is thoroughly incapable of doing. so on the whole, no, theo.physicists' shouldn't be going anywhere; exp.physicists on the other hand..............unless, of course, elon surprises us again with a sentient AI that can actually take over everything and become the next SkyNet!
1 1 Reply
Saket (Niedrig) 5 months ago
I think that robots will not be able to find new things as of right now they can only use a database and find things out of there a robot doesnt have enough creativity to look out into space for example and think"Hmm why is it moving" for something htat shouldnt move it is just gonna see it and be like"cool"
1 0 Reply
Samik Yanque Amable (Keine Chance) 5 months ago
A pure science is a kind of art where your creativity must shine to observe problems and devise solutions. The truth is, it hurts to think that my future will be filled with the anxiety of "finding a problem" that is relevant to science, but it's the hell I chose.

If any junior reads this message, I can only wish you the best. While your work is irreplaceable by AI, your future will be filled with problems where AI cannot assist you. Good luck.
2 0 Reply
Alec 4 months ago
Thank you. I am 12, and this is my dream job. Seeing this message really made me excited!
2 1 Reply
9 (Keine Chance) 1 year ago
We teach AI. That's how it understands. Although it can learn, it can't accumulate pure factual knowledge by itself.
0 0 Reply
Jamie (Höchstwahrscheinlich) 1 year ago
Hard science fields will be the easiest fields for AI to take-over.
0 2 Reply
MainEditor 8 months ago
But if AI can do hard science why it wouldn't as easy do soft science?
1 0 Reply
Zuzia (Mäßig) 1 year ago
AI can already teach itself new things and it escalates very quickly, it probably will be able to analyze all the knowledge we have on Earth and come to some important conclusions.
1 0 Reply
Samuel (Keine Chance) 1 year ago
It requires thinking outside the box, solving new problems, writing new programs. It has already implemented computers for calculations.
0 0 Reply
Toast (Keine Chance) 1 year ago
Being a physicist requires, at least to a certain degree, being able to come up with purely original ideas, rather than interpolating the existing body of knowledge.
3 0 Reply
Quarked_Out (Niedrig) 1 year ago
Hmm, a lot of areas in physics do incorporate ML techniques and AI to some degree. However, people with physics training play an undisputedly dominant role in research.

If anything, I can see some simulation aspects or redundant experimental procedures being automated in the near term. But parts that incorporate creative problem solving or the physical intuition needed in determining directions to take research are things that are pretty safeguarded to humans for a bit.

I think those "intuitions" are very difficult to map to general problem-solving algorithms.
0 0 Reply
Brian (No Chance) 2 years ago
Many other experimental physicists and I already automate every measurement we can, but there is still plenty of work to do.
1 0 Reply
David (Keine Chance) 2 years ago
I wonder what all those people were thinking when they said there was a realistic possibility that physicists will be obsolete in 20 years. That's absurd on its face and every physicist I have ever met would agree.

We can have a discussion on whether it is possible in the next 200 years, sure, but 20 years? That's laughable. Given that only physicists are qualified to write, train, and optimize the algorithms that would be used to replace them, it will take a long, long, long time.

I suspect that we would need true machine sentience before we could actually start to talk about replacing theoretical and mathematical physicists.
0 0 Reply
Bimsara Bodaragama (Keine Chance) 2 years ago
It's more about intuition and innovativeness. Of course, we will use more tools, but with Physics, since we interpret as we observe (there is a little problem with that conclusion, though), AI may not be able to take it over.
0 0 Reply
Wesley I (Keine Chance) 3 years ago
I believe that it will be possible but not for a very long time, the process of positing new questions and then solving them is rather complex and I'm guessing that it will be at least 100 years before the jobs of theoretical physicists start to become threatened.
0 0 Reply
just bored (Keine Chance) 3 years ago
Even though computers may get more intelligent than us humans, there is still a very small chance because computers don't have the basic questioning ability which we humans have
0 0 Reply
Rowan (Unsicher) 3 years ago
The development of AI is rapidly improving, AI maybe 10 years in the future being able to predict or understand the universe better through random generation or pure knowledge is very probable. However I doubt they will replace Physicists in the near decade it should be very increasingly possible.
0 0 Reply
rafel 3 years ago
We are users of AI to improve some calculations and we need robots and AI for experimental precision and performance. Until the singularity, we will be in charge.
0 0 Reply
Pinaki Patra 3 years ago
A huge section of theoretical physicists do algorithm based research, which can easily be replaced by automation.
However, Philosophy based theoretical research is difficult to be replaced.
0 0 Reply

Hinterlassen Sie eine Antwort zu diesem Beruf

Diese Seite ist durch reCAPTCHA geschützt und die Google Datenschutzbestimmungen und Nutzungsbedingungen gelten.