الحراس والعاملون في التنظيف، باستثناء الخادمات والعاملات في تنظيف المنازل

مخاطرة عالية
67٪؜
إلى أين ترغب في الذهاب بعد ذلك؟
شارك نتائجك مع الأصدقاء والعائلة.
أو، استكشف هذه المهنة بمزيد من التفصيل...
خطر الأتمتة
محسوب
76٪؜
(مخاطرة عالية)
التصويت
59٪؜
(مخاطر معتدلة)
Average: 67٪؜
طلب العمل
النمو
3٫1٪؜
بحلول العام 2033
أجور
35٬020 $
أو 16٫84 $ في الساعة
الحجم
2٬172٬500
اعتبارا من 2023
ملخص
نقاط الوظيفة
2٫9/10

الأشخاص قاموا أيضاً بالمشاهدة

مخاطر الأتمتة المحسوبة

76٪؜ (مخاطرة عالية)

مخاطرة عالية (61-80%): الوظائف في هذه الفئة تواجه تهديدًا كبيرًا من التحول الى الأتمتة، حيث يمكن أتمتة العديد من مهامها بسهولة باستخدام التكنولوجيا الحالية أو التكنولوجيا المستقبلية القريبة.

مزيد من المعلومات حول ما هذه النتيجة، وكيف يتم حسابها متوفرة هنا.

بعض الصفات المهمة جداً للوظيفة صعبة التحويل إلى أتمتة:

  • الرشاقة اليدوية

استطلاع رأي المستخدمين

فرصة 59٪؜ للأتمتة الكاملة خلال العقدين القادمين

صوت زوارنا بأنهم غير متأكدين إذا كان سيتم أتمتة هذه المهنة. ومع ذلك، يشير مستوى خطر الأتمتة الذي أنشأناه إلى فرصة أعلى بكثير للأتمتة: 76٪؜ فرصة للأتمتة.

ما هو رأيك في مخاطر الأتمتة؟

ما هي احتمالية أن يتم استبدال الحراس والعاملون في التنظيف، باستثناء الخادمات والعاملات في تنظيف المنازل بالروبوتات أو الذكاء الاصطناعي في غضون العشرين سنة المقبلة؟






المشاعر

يتم تضمين الرسم البياني التالي في أي مكان يوجد فيه عدد كبير من الأصوات لتقديم بيانات ذات مغزى. تعرض هذه التمثيلات المرئية نتائج استطلاعات المستخدمين على مر الزمن، مما يوفر دلالة مهمة على اتجاهات المشاعر.

المشاعر على مر الزمن (سنوياً)

النمو

نمو بطيء نسبياً مقارنة بالمهن الأخرى.

من المتوقع أن يزداد 3٫1٪؜ عدد فرص العمل المتاحة لـ 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' بحلول 2033

التوظيف الكلي، وفتحات الوظائف المقدرة

* بيانات من مكتب إحصاءات العمل للفترة ما بين 2021 و 2031
من المتوقع تحديث التوقعات في 09-2024.

أجور

مدفوع بشكل قليل جداً مقارنة بالمهن الأخرى

في 2023، بلغ الأجر السنوي الوسيط لـ 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' 35٬020 $، أو 16 $ في الساعة

تم دفع 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' بمعدل أقل بـ 27٫1٪؜ من الأجر الوسيط الوطني، الذي بلغ 48٬060 $

الأجور على مر الزمن

* بيانات من مكتب إحصاءات العمل

الحجم

نطاق أكبر بشكل ملحوظ من فرص العمل مقارنة بالمهن الأخرى

بحلول 2023 كان هناك 2٬172٬500 شخص يعملون كـ 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners' داخل الولايات المتحدة.

هذا يمثل حوالي 1٫4٪؜ من القوى العاملة الموظفة في جميع أنحاء البلاد

بتعبير آخر، حوالي 1 من كل 69 أشخاص يعملون كـ 'Janitors and Cleaners, Except Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners'.

وصف الوظيفة

حافظ على المباني في حالة نظيفة ومرتبة. قم بمهام التنظيف الثقيلة، مثل تنظيف الأرضيات، وغسل السجاد، وغسل الجدران والزجاج، وإزالة القمامة. قد تشمل المهام الاهتمام بالموقد والغلاية، وأداء أنشطة الصيانة الروتينية، وإبلاغ الإدارة بالحاجة إلى الإصلاحات، وتنظيف الثلج أو الحطام من الرصيف.

SOC Code: 37-2011.00

موارد

إذا كنت تفكر في بدء مهنة جديدة، أو تبحث عن تغيير وظائفك، فقد قمنا بإنشاء أداة بحث عملية قد تساعدك في الحصول على الدور الجديد المثالي.

ابحث عن وظائف في منطقتك المحلية

تعليقات

Leave a comment

Jeff (معتدل) 8 days ago
As a janitor, I know from experience automated tech usually breaks down at an equal rate that it works. Case in point, floor scrubbers that are supposed to help us make short work of hallways have problems with keeping charged batteries long enough to run reliably or constantly leak water or fail to pick up the water dispensed on the floor. Also, in a hospital environment when cleaning patient rooms and restrooms, it still takes a human to wipe down furniture, clean sinks and commodes, wash walls, dust, etc.
0 0 Reply
Mike 5 months ago
Lol not even close. Laughably high %. More than a web developer? I'd like to see a robot clean up after a basketball game. Climb the bleachers, go under the bleachers, put away chairs, scoreboard, cords, mics, etc, lock doors, clean glass, scrape gum, auto scrub, spot mop, rinse out a garbage can. There are way too many unique tasks imo.
1 1 Reply
Johan Smitten (لا فرصة) 5 months ago
It's not complicated work, but even tasks like mopping and scrubbing toilets don't seem like something any modern robot can do. Even if Japan whipped something up, it just wouldn't make financial sense to buy and maintain a robot over hiring a minimum wage worker.
0 0 Reply
Bryck (منخفض) 8 months ago
Unless a new technological breakthrough occurs, the risk of janitors being replaced are quite low. Vocational academies can earn revenue and employ a major sector of janitors. Above vocational qualifications, though, is the fact that automation in this specific sector does not increase productivity at all. Not only do vocational schools help earn more revenue, but automation costs a lot more than simply employing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Jeff (غير مؤكد) 10 months ago
The technology of AI has a couple or three more decades before it can become reliable enough to do repetitive tasks and the maintenance of such machines is especially high as they have a lot of technical issues so the reliability of such automation is a ways off.
0 0 Reply
Josh (منخفض) 1 year ago
I can see automation doing things like cleaning floors and tables but i can't see it being cost effective to have a bot do everything a janitor does in a normal day. everything from taking trash out and throwing it in the dumpsters to shampooing stains out of carpets to removing vandalism and cleaning complex surfaces like toilets and sinks. Not to mention tasks like opening up and refilling toilet paper and paper towel dispensers.

Don't get me wrong, i think it could be done, i just think the cost would be outrageous and that somebody would still often have to step in for unusual messes and vandalism.
0 0 Reply
Kory Hasch (منخفض) 1 year ago
Because machines can operate on a basic level, and deep cleaning requires human judgment.
0 0 Reply
Mike (لا فرصة) 1 year ago
In offices, schools, factories, and public spaces like malls and restaurants, I do not believe janitorial is at risk for automation. In order to make the tasks involved more able to be automated, they would have to do two things:

A. Invest significantly in equipment and processes that make the tasks much easier to do, and
B. Put a lot of personal responsibility on the people causing messes, generating the trash, and otherwise making the work that is needed to be done.

For A, restrooms would have to be redesigned with standards for toilets, urinals, sinks, etc where automated brushes could easily reach them. Trash receptacles would also need regular emptying and cleaning. It could be done, and I believe they've even invented self-cleaning restrooms where it basically treats the entire interior like a dishwasher, locking it off and doing high pressure sprays with sanitizing chemicals. It would be very very expensive to redesign them in such a way, not to mention the ongoing maintenance costs of such precision equipment. Similar with locker/shower rooms, kitchenettes, and break areas.

For B, in order for desk waste receptacle collection to be automated, office workers would need to actually throw trash inside the trash can and not beside, behind, or underneath. They would need to have it in a fixed position, and keep the area in front of it clear, and not obstructed with personal items, stacks of paper, or other junk. Similar to automated vacuum robots, they would need the area they're to clean free of obstacles. The best way to clean greasy fingerprints off glass doors is simply not have them there in the first place; train people to put their hands on the handle. Office workers in particular are incredibly inconsiderate of the work they leave for others, and office facilities would rather hire double the amount of cleaning staff to be demeaned and jump through ridiculous and unnecessary hoops.

The amount of investment needed to automate janitorial tasks would be incredibly high. If they really wanted to save money, they could instantly probably cut 25-50% of their workforce budget by being considerate to others. But they'd much rather waste money on digging their heels into classism, ensuring there are "servants" to look down upon.
0 0 Reply
Not a robot (لا فرصة) 1 year ago
cleaning seems automated but its very much not. you may do same tasks, but a robot wont be cheaper to maintain then hiring a person. and you would need like a robot for each specific task then someone to repair robot if it breaks down. Just do not see AI replacing janitors.
0 0 Reply
Max Dragonard (من المحتمل جدا) 3 years ago
Perfect job for a robot.
0 0 Reply
thao (من المحتمل جدا) 3 years ago
There is lots of money to be made with automation, robotics, AI. Still, we won't see cleaning robotic or humanoid for a least 10 - 15 yrs, my opinion cause companies are taking ages to make it perfect like human-like, robotic but then I am too old I will be retired anyway.
0 0 Reply
Experienced Cleaner (لا فرصة) 3 years ago
No matter how sophisticated the AI and software, plus the sensing technology a robot has, it will still require humans to train, service, and operate it. Its interface will have to be simplified enough to where its operator can program and run it, while focusing on the less predictable aspects of the cleaning work. AI and automation will only reduce the turnover rate and increase wages in this occupation.
0 0 Reply
Ben (غير مؤكد) 3 years ago
Addressing Peter's comment that states robots and artificial intelligence cannot be made to cope with the unpredictability of dealing with people.

I am currently writing this comment using an artificial intelligence aid. It is called Grammarly. I write rather well on my own, the help though is appreciated. It can improvise upon what I'm going to write.

Does this mean it reads my mind? No, it uses algorithms to prognosticate what is coming based upon my previous writing. From that, it can then access other algorithms that study grammatical rules and policies. That allows it to use an algorithm to assist my writing by editing.

My point being case variables in programmatic instructions can be defined so as to "follow" and "cope" with people. I work as a custodian presently for our county's public schools, which we have from pre-school to grade twelve. Children are the most unpredictable of all humans.

I can easily see how timing schedules, sensors, algorithms could all be put in place to cut my workload by two-thirds, or more. My work can be greatly automated. Still, there would need to be technicians both to repair the physical and mechanical aspects and to repair the computing code at times. So I say it could go either way.
0 0 Reply
Ron Leffers 4 years ago
there will less people working with robots but more people doing other things
0 0 Reply
Jayden (من المحتمل جدا) 4 years ago
We’ve already got little cleaning technology and I think it would be good to have robots that would just do this
0 0 Reply
Peter (منخفض) 5 years ago
This job deal with people and unpredictable action of people make difficult to created AI capable do do it. That was reason why was stopped it development. Job my be changed from actual cleaning to preparing area for robots.
0 0 Reply

اترك ردا حول هذه المهنة

هذا الموقع محمي بواسطة reCAPTCHA و سياسة الخصوصية و شروط الخدمة الخاصة بـ Google تنطبق.