اقتصاديون

مخاطر معتدلة
48٪؜
إلى أين ترغب في الذهاب بعد ذلك؟
شارك نتائجك مع الأصدقاء والعائلة.
أو، استكشف هذه المهنة بمزيد من التفصيل...
خطر الأتمتة
محسوب
51٪؜
(مخاطر معتدلة)
التصويت
45٪؜
(مخاطر معتدلة)
Average: 48٪؜
طلب العمل
النمو
5٫1٪؜
بحلول العام 2033
أجور
115٬730 $
أو 55٫63 $ في الساعة
الحجم
16٬420
اعتبارا من 2023
ملخص
نقاط الوظيفة
5٫6/10

الأشخاص قاموا أيضاً بالمشاهدة

مخاطر الأتمتة المحسوبة

51٪؜ (مخاطر معتدلة)

مخاطر متوسطة (41-60%): المهن التي تتضمن مخاطر متوسطة للأتمتة تتضمن عادة المهام الروتينية ولكنها ما زالت تتطلب بعض الحكم البشري والتفاعل.

مزيد من المعلومات حول ما هذه النتيجة، وكيف يتم حسابها متوفرة هنا.

بعض الصفات المهمة جداً للوظيفة صعبة التحويل إلى أتمتة:

  • الأصالة

  • إقناع

استطلاع رأي المستخدمين

فرصة 45٪؜ للأتمتة الكاملة خلال العقدين القادمين

صوت زوارنا بأنهم غير متأكدين إذا كان سيتم أتمتة هذه المهنة. يدعم هذا التقييم أيضًا بواسطة مستوى خطر الأتمتة المحسوب، الذي يقدر بـ 51٪؜ فرصة للأتمتة.

ما هو رأيك في مخاطر الأتمتة؟

ما هي احتمالية أن يتم استبدال اقتصاديون بالروبوتات أو الذكاء الاصطناعي في غضون العشرين سنة المقبلة؟






المشاعر

يتم تضمين الرسم البياني التالي في أي مكان يوجد فيه عدد كبير من الأصوات لتقديم بيانات ذات مغزى. تعرض هذه التمثيلات المرئية نتائج استطلاعات المستخدمين على مر الزمن، مما يوفر دلالة مهمة على اتجاهات المشاعر.

المشاعر على مر الزمن (ربع سنوي)

المشاعر على مر الزمن (سنوياً)

النمو

نمو معتدل بالنسبة للمهن الأخرى

من المتوقع أن يزداد 5٫1٪؜ عدد فرص العمل المتاحة لـ 'Economists' بحلول 2033

التوظيف الكلي، وفتحات الوظائف المقدرة

* بيانات من مكتب إحصاءات العمل للفترة ما بين 2021 و 2031
من المتوقع تحديث التوقعات في 09-2024.

أجور

مدفوع بشكل كبير جداً بالمقارنة مع المهن الأخرى

في 2023، بلغ الأجر السنوي الوسيط لـ 'Economists' 115٬730 $، أو 55 $ في الساعة

تم دفع "Economists" بمقدار 140٫8٪؜ أعلى من الأجر الوسيط الوطني، الذي بلغ 48٬060 $

الأجور على مر الزمن

* بيانات من مكتب إحصاءات العمل

الحجم

نطاق أقل من فرص العمل مقارنة بالمهن الأخرى

بحلول 2023 كان هناك 16٬420 شخص يعملون كـ 'Economists' داخل الولايات المتحدة.

هذا يمثل حوالي < 0٫001٪؜ من القوى العاملة الموظفة في جميع أنحاء البلاد

بتعبير آخر، حوالي 1 من كل 9 ألف أشخاص يعملون كـ 'Economists'.

وصف الوظيفة

قم بإجراء البحوث، وإعداد التقارير، أو صياغة الخطط لمعالجة المشكلات الاقتصادية المتعلقة بإنتاج وتوزيع السلع والخدمات أو السياسة النقدية والمالية. قد يتم جمع ومعالجة البيانات الاقتصادية والإحصائية باستخدام تقنيات العينات والأساليب الاقتصادية القياسية.

SOC Code: 19-3011.00

موارد

إذا كنت تفكر في بدء مهنة جديدة، أو تبحث عن تغيير وظائفك، فقد قمنا بإنشاء أداة بحث عملية قد تساعدك في الحصول على الدور الجديد المثالي.

ابحث عن وظائف في منطقتك المحلية

تعليقات

Leave a comment

Jesus told me to own a gun (من المحتمل جدا) 12 months ago
economics is renowned for it's extremely poor level of accuracy due to economists ideological cognitive dissonance. AI will easily replace the industry with higher levels of accuracy and improved reaction time to problematic variables.
1 0 Reply
the truth (من المحتمل جدا) 1 year ago
economists are inherently flawed in their predictions and prescriptions as they lack insight in sciences such as sociology, social policy etc.

they consistantly display an inability to model any form of human behaviour and the lack of these variables in their data have lead to perpetual disaterous global economic crashes.

AI will doubtless surpass human economists in the very short term and as a result, large, medium and even small business will dispence with the need for any form of human based economic processes which offer very little financial return for the cost incurred.
1 0 Reply
Carlos Plácido Teixeira (معتدل) 3 years ago
The profession is full of routines in its analytical processes. Already today, recommendations for the best investments in bonds and stocks are starting to be made by artificial intelligence systems. If professionals insist on exclusively using econometric tools, then the probability tends to be even greater.
0 0 Reply
Miguel Villavicencio (منخفض) 3 years ago
As long as human interests define human decisions, economists will have an organic field.
1 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al Zahrani 3 years ago
There is no chance for Economists to run outta of jobs?!!

Cause economists are indeed in demand in "High Demand" and economists are aware of automations and risk of losing jobs.

So how the heck you would want a machine to take over the job?? Without human economists our economy will be unstable and not accurate at all.

We need human economists not "machines". Economists are highly important it's our society our life we couldn't live without it.

We don't expect businesses to fail we need to accommodate that.
0 0 Reply
Preto 5 months ago
Finally somoene that actually understands what economy really is
0 0 Reply
Teg (من المحتمل جدا) 3 years ago
Society will reach a steady state where economic policy will be easily automated
0 0 Reply
Chris (لا فرصة) 3 years ago
Requires outside the box thinking that can't be programmed into a robot
0 0 Reply
Yehuda Porath (منخفض) 4 years ago
I'm an economist. Our "science" is made up of many things. Some of it, like the statistical work and data collection and processing, seems fairly roboticizable.

Much of the rest - The interpretations, the use of theory to explain results, figuring out why the theory often doesn't carry over to the real world, understanding the human behavior behind complex systems of humans messing things up together, figuring out why This Time Is (or isn't) Different - all this requires a great deal of intuition, persuasion, creativity, and intuitive leaps, in addition to the knowledge, information, data, and models we learn.

It doesn't at this time appear that we'll get AI that good within 2 decades. I suppose it's possible, we could hit the Singularity, but I doubt it in that time frame
0 0 Reply
Phillip Tussing 4 years ago
Ha ha ha! OF COURSE economists will not be replaced! As Ludwig von Mises might say, it is impossible to "do economics" without humans. Ah, but teaching undergraduate economics can be done by pre-recorded videos, with grading done simply and automatically, and supervised by a few economists. And of course all the number-crunching required for corporate economics can be done by algorithms, supervised by a few human economists. And almost all the number-crunching in research work can be done by programs overseen by a few research economists. So... there will still be a few economics jobs...
0 0 Reply
rle (من المحتمل جدا) 4 years ago
If economist continue to create use regression analysis only looking at prior data then yes, there is no need to pay an analyst 100K to click a button anyone can do in excel. I've worked to automate these roles & actuarial positions.
0 0 Reply
Tom 3 years ago
It doesn't sound like you know what actuaries (and possibly economists) do. The spreadsheets full of calculations are a tool, not the product. The work you're describing is mostly done by uncredentialed junior "actuarial analysts" or even by interns.
0 0 Reply
Lol (No chance) 4 years ago
The automation of analysis and modeling is a great and useful tool for economists (and actuaries). However, as time goes on, there is exponentially more "prior data" you were using with your automation. As new data is generated every day, we are constantly analyzing it to improve both the assumptions on which we base our models and our modeling techniques themselves.

I agree with you that the field will become automated, but not in the way that you mean it: as a one-time formula where you click a button and "the answer" is computed. Because economics (and actuarial science) are far from being fully understood. Likewise, their models are far from perfect at generating an ideal solution. To achieve a perfect model, all relevant pieces of information regarding how every individual human will make every future decision must be known (which is impossible), but because we have more data and analysis tools every day, the practice of studying economics will continue to be a valuable and profitable area of expertise.
Automation does not mean extinction!!!!
0 0 Reply
Niko (لا فرصة) 4 years ago
The insights change as macro fundamentals change... a computer cannot understand the macro indicators, political influence, sentiment or expectations.. We still do not understand inflation
0 0 Reply
Anukul Bodile (لا فرصة) 4 years ago
I would have said that AI would replace economists if all humans were this mythical being called Homo economicus, someone who has no social affinities, no lapses of judgement or hang-ups, no capacity even for thinking about anyone besides him or herself.
0 0 Reply
Nerd sry 4 years ago
Ahh yes, the assumption that humans are "rational decision-makers" in neoclassical models of economics. These optimization patterns not even close to the way our (non-robot) brains make decisions... Completely agree
0 0 Reply
Isaac Lemmen (لا فرصة) 4 years ago
It is mostly politics and rhetoric
0 0 Reply
Gino (لا فرصة) 4 years ago
La economia es la accion humana como diria ludwig von mises es imposible hacer economia sin humanos.

Economics is human action, as Ludwig von Mises would say, it is impossible to do economics without humans.
0 0 Reply
levi eleazar de oliveira bezerra (منخفض) 5 years ago
The economics sector studies human behaviour and is not a matter of exact since it requires creativity and study of society to be able to apply the changes and for this to happen and necessary the accompaniment to the effective result.
0 0 Reply

اترك ردا حول هذه المهنة

هذا الموقع محمي بواسطة reCAPTCHA و سياسة الخصوصية و شروط الخدمة الخاصة بـ Google تنطبق.