化学家

中等风险
40%
您接下来想去哪里?
与朋友和家人分享您的结果。
投票 评论 (13)
或者,更深入地探索这个职业...
自动化风险
计算出的
46%
(中等风险)
投票
34%
(低风险)
Average: 40%
劳动力需求
增长
7.6%
到2033年
工资
$84,680
或每小时 $40.71
体积
83,530
截至 2023
摘要
工作评分
6.8/10

人们还浏览了

计算自动化风险

46% (中等风险)

中等风险(41-60%):中等风险的职业通常涉及常规任务,但仍需要一些人类的判断和交互。

有关这个分数是什么以及如何计算的更多信息可在这里找到。

工作中的一些相当重要的品质难以自动化:

  • 手指灵巧

  • 原创性

  • 社会洞察力

用户投票

在接下来的二十年内,实现全自动化的可能性为34%

我们的访客投票表示,这个职业被自动化的可能性很低。 这个评估进一步得到了通过计算得出的自动化风险等级的支持,该等级预计有46%的机会实现自动化。

你认为自动化的风险是什么?

化学家在未来20年内被机器人或人工智能取代的可能性有多大?






情感

以下图表在有大量投票数据时会显示。这些可视化图表展示了用户投票结果随时间的变化,提供了情感趋势的重要指示。

随着时间(每年)的情绪变化

增长

相对于其他职业,非常快速的增长。

预计"Chemists"的工作空缺数量将在2033内增长7.6%

总就业人数和预计的职位空缺

* 根据劳工统计局的数据,该数据涵盖了从2021到2031的期间。
更新的预测将在09-2024到期.

工资

相对于其他职业来说薪酬高

在2023,'Chemists'的年度中位数工资为$84,680,或每小时$40。

'Chemists'的薪资比全国中位工资高76.2%,全国中位工资为$48,060。

随着时间推移的工资

* 来自美国劳工统计局的数据

体积

与其他职业相比,工作机会的适中范围。

截至2023,在美国有83,530人被雇佣为'Chemists'。

这代表了全国就业劳动力的大约0.06%

换句话说,大约每1 千人中就有1人被雇佣为“Chemists”。

工作描述

在实验室中进行定性和定量化学分析或实验,以进行质量或流程控制,或开发新产品或知识。

SOC Code: 19-2031.00

资源

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

如果您正在考虑开始新的职业生涯,或者想要换工作,我们已经为您创建了一个方便的工作搜索工具,它可能会帮助您找到那个完美的新角色。

在您的本地区搜索工作岗位

评论

Leave a comment

Ark (低) 1 month ago
Despite chemistry growing leap and bounds by computational and machine learning methods, real world results tend to deviate greatly from expected computed outcomes. Hence, chemistry as a field will always need human creativity and critical thinking to survive.
0 0 Reply
Hardkless (低) 6 months ago
Very unlikely, scientists and other similar jobs are very difficult for AI to replace.
0 0 Reply
G (极有可能) 8 months ago
It involves very precise instructions and repeated tasks. It also involves having a wide range of knowledge
0 0 Reply
Michael (极有可能) 10 months ago
Lab automation systems do already have a high impact on the number of jobs in the sector, especially in the Pharma industry. Analytical chemistry is a little harder to automate than the synthesis branch and might even grow in the future, but the days for synthetical organic chemistry are counted. GMOs do increase the pressure further, since its becoming much cheaper and faster to genetically modify bacteria and fungi into producing your product, than to develop complicated synthesis routes over several steps. Anorganic chemistry and material sciences might become more important, but will not be able to make up for the losses in the organic branch
0 0 Reply
Will N (极有可能) 1 year ago
Chemistry, like law, is 80% lookup, 10% calculation and 10% inspiration
0 0 Reply
Sobes (低) 1 year ago
A QC Chemistry Lab is usually run my corporations who would gladly shed as much human capital costs as possible.

There are autotitrators and autosamplers for many different equipment (Dissolution systems, HPLC, GC, UPLC, Mass spec and so on). These technologies have been around for decades yet analysts are still required to prepare samples, analyze them and then interpret and report data .

The two tenants which make a job susceptible to replacent by automation are Predictability and complexity. Some chemical analysis (more specifically wet chemistry, non-instrumental techniques) is more complex than what current automation systems can handle (i.e. chemical digestion of a sample, followed by extraction with a solvent, evaporation of the solvent) also sample quality is unpredictable (hence why QC labs exist, if every manufacturing method was flawless there would be no need for QC/QA).
0 0 Reply
MLearry 1 year ago
The profession of Material Scientists has a 22% representation. A Chemist must take Physical Chemistry, Physics, and an elective related to Physical Chemistry.

Aspects of Inorganic Chemistry, Physical Organic Chemistry, and Polymers (as a part of Organic Chemistry) are very relevant to developing new materials with desirable properties. In fact, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) in the U.S.A. categorizes Chemists and Material Scientists as one and the same profile.

Job opportunities for Material Scientists do allow Chemists to be considered as Material Scientists when the Chemist has experience and multiple credits in Physical Chemistry, Polymers, and/or Inorganic Chemistry. Many Chemists follow this professional direction. In fact, some departments are even named 'Materials Chemistry'.

This fact indicates that one of these professions has an incorrect percentage representation on this website. Either Materials Science should have 51% (or a percentage much closer to Chemistry) on this website, or Chemistry should have 22% (similar to Materials Science). The large discrepancy simply reflects a mistaken view on the nature of their work.

Chemistry, by default, incorporates aspects of Physical Chemistry applicable to materials. It is suggested to reassess the activities of chemists to correct the percentage that has been flawed in a previous assessment.
0 0 Reply
Kyle (低) 3 years ago
Aspects definitely will be. I trimmed my own work by 80%. But the core field will be maintained, as I just got to do newer cool stuff instead of banal work
0 0 Reply
Anthony 4 years ago
Seems to be one of the few good things about the chemistry job market. So glad I chose to study something different.
0 0 Reply
KPS 4 years ago
Safer side..... That's good
0 0 Reply
Jay (没有机会) 5 years ago
The work of chemists is too technical for AI.
0 0 Reply
Álvaro (没有机会) 5 years ago
Scientists will never be replaced by robots
0 0 Reply
Ires (没有机会) 5 years ago
Automation will never overtake the job of a scientist
0 0 Reply

关于这个职业请留下您的评论

此网站受到reCAPTCHA和Google的隐私政策以及服务条款的保护。