Ekonomer

Måttlig Risk
49%
Vart vill du åka härnäst?
Dela dina resultat med vänner och familj.
Eller, utforska detta yrke i större detalj...
RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
51%
(Måttlig Risk)
UNDERSÖKNING
47%
(Måttlig Risk)
Average: 49%
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
5,1%
från år 2033
LÖNER
115 730 $
eller 55,63 $ per timme
Volym
16 420
från och med 2023
SAMMANFATTNING
JOBBPOÄNG
5,6/10

Personer tittade också på

Beräknad automatiseringsrisk

51% (Måttlig Risk)

Måttlig risk (41-60%): Yrken med måttlig risk för automatisering involverar oftast rutinmässiga uppgifter men kräver fortfarande en viss mänsklig bedömning och interaktion.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Originalitet

  • Övertalning

Användarundersökning

47% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att de är osäkra på om detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Detta bedömning stöds ytterligare av den beräknade automationsrisknivån, som uppskattar 51% chans för automation.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Ekonomer kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?






Känsla

Följande graf inkluderas där det finns en betydande mängd röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användaromröstningsresultat över tid och ger en viktig indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känsla över tid (kvartalsvis)

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Måttlig tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Economists' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 5,1% till 2033

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2021 och 2031
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2024.

Löner

Mycket högt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2023 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Economists' 115 730 $, eller 55 $ per timme.

'Economists' betalades 140,8% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 48 060 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Lägre utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2023 var det 16 420 personer anställda som 'Economists' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka < 0,001% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 9 tusen personer är anställda som 'Economists'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Genomför forskning, förbered rapporter eller utforma planer för att hantera ekonomiska problem relaterade till produktion och distribution av varor och tjänster eller penning- och finanspolitik. Kan samla in och bearbeta ekonomiska och statistiska data med hjälp av stickprovsstekniker och ekonometriska metoder.

SOC Code: 19-3011.00

Resurser

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Kommentarer

Leave a comment

Jesus told me to own a gun (Mycket troligt) 1 year ago
economics is renowned for it's extremely poor level of accuracy due to economists ideological cognitive dissonance. AI will easily replace the industry with higher levels of accuracy and improved reaction time to problematic variables.
1 0 Reply
the truth (Mycket troligt) 1 year ago
economists are inherently flawed in their predictions and prescriptions as they lack insight in sciences such as sociology, social policy etc.

they consistantly display an inability to model any form of human behaviour and the lack of these variables in their data have lead to perpetual disaterous global economic crashes.

AI will doubtless surpass human economists in the very short term and as a result, large, medium and even small business will dispence with the need for any form of human based economic processes which offer very little financial return for the cost incurred.
1 0 Reply
Carlos Plácido Teixeira (Måttlig) 3 years ago
The profession is full of routines in its analytical processes. Already today, recommendations for the best investments in bonds and stocks are starting to be made by artificial intelligence systems. If professionals insist on exclusively using econometric tools, then the probability tends to be even greater.
0 0 Reply
Miguel Villavicencio (Låg) 3 years ago
As long as human interests define human decisions, economists will have an organic field.
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al Zahrani 3 years ago
There is no chance for Economists to run outta of jobs?!!

Cause economists are indeed in demand in "High Demand" and economists are aware of automations and risk of losing jobs.

So how the heck you would want a machine to take over the job?? Without human economists our economy will be unstable and not accurate at all.

We need human economists not "machines". Economists are highly important it's our society our life we couldn't live without it.

We don't expect businesses to fail we need to accommodate that.
1 0 Reply
Preto 6 months ago
Finally somoene that actually understands what economy really is
0 0 Reply
Teg (Mycket troligt) 3 years ago
Society will reach a steady state where economic policy will be easily automated
0 0 Reply
Chris (Ingen chans) 3 years ago
Requires outside the box thinking that can't be programmed into a robot
0 0 Reply
Yehuda Porath (Låg) 4 years ago
I'm an economist. Our "science" is made up of many things. Some of it, like the statistical work and data collection and processing, seems fairly roboticizable.

Much of the rest - The interpretations, the use of theory to explain results, figuring out why the theory often doesn't carry over to the real world, understanding the human behavior behind complex systems of humans messing things up together, figuring out why This Time Is (or isn't) Different - all this requires a great deal of intuition, persuasion, creativity, and intuitive leaps, in addition to the knowledge, information, data, and models we learn.

It doesn't at this time appear that we'll get AI that good within 2 decades. I suppose it's possible, we could hit the Singularity, but I doubt it in that time frame
0 0 Reply
Phillip Tussing 4 years ago
Ha ha ha! OF COURSE economists will not be replaced! As Ludwig von Mises might say, it is impossible to "do economics" without humans. Ah, but teaching undergraduate economics can be done by pre-recorded videos, with grading done simply and automatically, and supervised by a few economists. And of course all the number-crunching required for corporate economics can be done by algorithms, supervised by a few human economists. And almost all the number-crunching in research work can be done by programs overseen by a few research economists. So... there will still be a few economics jobs...
0 0 Reply
rle (Mycket troligt) 4 years ago
If economist continue to create use regression analysis only looking at prior data then yes, there is no need to pay an analyst 100K to click a button anyone can do in excel. I've worked to automate these roles & actuarial positions.
0 0 Reply
Tom 3 years ago
It doesn't sound like you know what actuaries (and possibly economists) do. The spreadsheets full of calculations are a tool, not the product. The work you're describing is mostly done by uncredentialed junior "actuarial analysts" or even by interns.
0 0 Reply
Lol (No chance) 4 years ago
The automation of analysis and modeling is a great and useful tool for economists (and actuaries). However, as time goes on, there is exponentially more "prior data" you were using with your automation. As new data is generated every day, we are constantly analyzing it to improve both the assumptions on which we base our models and our modeling techniques themselves.

I agree with you that the field will become automated, but not in the way that you mean it: as a one-time formula where you click a button and "the answer" is computed. Because economics (and actuarial science) are far from being fully understood. Likewise, their models are far from perfect at generating an ideal solution. To achieve a perfect model, all relevant pieces of information regarding how every individual human will make every future decision must be known (which is impossible), but because we have more data and analysis tools every day, the practice of studying economics will continue to be a valuable and profitable area of expertise.
Automation does not mean extinction!!!!
0 0 Reply
Niko (Ingen chans) 4 years ago
The insights change as macro fundamentals change... a computer cannot understand the macro indicators, political influence, sentiment or expectations.. We still do not understand inflation
0 0 Reply
Anukul Bodile (Ingen chans) 4 years ago
I would have said that AI would replace economists if all humans were this mythical being called Homo economicus, someone who has no social affinities, no lapses of judgement or hang-ups, no capacity even for thinking about anyone besides him or herself.
0 0 Reply
Nerd sry 4 years ago
Ahh yes, the assumption that humans are "rational decision-makers" in neoclassical models of economics. These optimization patterns not even close to the way our (non-robot) brains make decisions... Completely agree
0 0 Reply
Isaac Lemmen (Ingen chans) 4 years ago
It is mostly politics and rhetoric
0 0 Reply
Gino (Ingen chans) 4 years ago
La economia es la accion humana como diria ludwig von mises es imposible hacer economia sin humanos.

Economics is human action, as Ludwig von Mises would say, it is impossible to do economics without humans.
0 0 Reply
levi eleazar de oliveira bezerra (Låg) 5 years ago
The economics sector studies human behaviour and is not a matter of exact since it requires creativity and study of society to be able to apply the changes and for this to happen and necessary the accompaniment to the effective result.
0 0 Reply

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke

Denna webbplats skyddas av reCAPTCHA och Googles sekretesspolicy och användarvillkor gäller.