Ekonomer

RISK FÖR AUTOMATISERING
BERÄKNAD
51%
risknivå
UNDERSÖKNING
37%
Baserat på 1 128 röster
ARBETSMARKNADSBEHOV
TILLVÄXT
5,7%
från år 2032
LÖNER
113.940 $
eller 54,77 $ per timme
Volym
16 370
från och med 2022
SAMMANFATTNING
JOBBPOÄNG
6,0/10

Vill du ha denna sammanfattning på din webbplats? Bädda in kod:

Risk för automatisering

51% (Måttlig Risk)

Måttlig risk (41-60%): Yrken med måttlig risk för automatisering involverar oftast rutinmässiga uppgifter men kräver fortfarande en viss mänsklig bedömning och interaktion.

Mer information om vad detta betyg är, och hur det beräknas finns tillgängligt här.

Vissa ganska viktiga egenskaper hos jobbet är svåra att automatisera:

  • Originalitet

  • Övertalning

Användarundersökning

37% procent chans för full automatisering inom de närmaste två decennierna

Våra besökare har röstat att det är en låg chans att detta yrke kommer att automatiseras. Emellertid tyder den automatiseringsrisknivå vi har genererat på en högre chans för automatisering: 51% chans för automatisering.

Vad tror du är risken med automatisering?

Vad är sannolikheten att Ekonomer kommer att ersättas av robotar eller artificiell intelligens inom de närmaste 20 åren?






Känsla

Följande diagram inkluderas överallt där det finns ett betydande antal röster för att ge meningsfull data. Dessa visuella representationer visar användarundersökningars resultat över tid, vilket ger en betydande indikation på sentimenttrender.

Känsla över tid (kvartalsvis)

Känslor över tid (årligen)

Tillväxt

Måttlig tillväxt jämfört med andra yrken

Antalet 'Economists' lediga jobb förväntas att öka med 5,7% till 2032

Total sysselsättning och uppskattade jobböppningar

* Data från Bureau of Labor Statistics för perioden mellan 2021 och 2031
Uppdaterade prognoser beräknas 09-2023.

Löner

Mycket högt betald jämfört med andra yrken

I 2022 var den medianårliga lönen för 'Economists' 113.940 $, eller 54 $ per timme.

'Economists' betalades 146,0% högre än den nationella medianlönen, som låg på 46.310 $

Löner över tid

* Data från Byrån för arbetsstatistik

Volym

Lägre utbud av jobbmöjligheter jämfört med andra yrken

Från och med 2022 var det 16 370 personer anställda som 'Economists' inom USA.

Detta representerar cirka < 0,001% av den anställda arbetskraften i hela landet

Sagt på ett annat sätt, runt 1 av 9 tusen personer är anställda som 'Economists'.

Arbetsbeskrivning

Genomför forskning, förbered rapporter eller utforma planer för att hantera ekonomiska problem relaterade till produktion och distribution av varor och tjänster eller penning- och finanspolitik. Kan samla in och bearbeta ekonomiska och statistiska data med hjälp av stickprovsstekniker och ekonometriska metoder.

SOC Code: 19-3011.00

Resurser

Om du funderar på att starta en ny karriär, eller vill byta jobb, har vi skapat ett praktiskt jobbsökverktyg som kanske kan hjälpa dig att hitta den perfekta nya rollen.

Sök jobb i ditt lokala område

Kommentarer

Lämna en kommentar

Jesus told me to own a gun (Mycket troligt) säger
economics is renowned for it's extremely poor level of accuracy due to economists ideological cognitive dissonance. AI will easily replace the industry with higher levels of accuracy and improved reaction time to problematic variables.
Dec 03, 2023 at 03:25
the truth (Mycket troligt) säger
economists are inherently flawed in their predictions and prescriptions as they lack insight in sciences such as sociology, social policy etc.

they consistantly display an inability to model any form of human behaviour and the lack of these variables in their data have lead to perpetual disaterous global economic crashes.

AI will doubtless surpass human economists in the very short term and as a result, large, medium and even small business will dispence with the need for any form of human based economic processes which offer very little financial return for the cost incurred.
Nov 09, 2023 at 09:07
Carlos Plácido Teixeira (Måttlig) säger
The profession is full of routines in its analytical processes. Already today, recommendations for the best investments in bonds and stocks are starting to be made by artificial intelligence systems. If professionals insist on exclusively using econometric tools, then the probability tends to be even greater.
Aug 14, 2021 at 01:10
Miguel Villavicencio (Låg) säger
As long as human interests define human decisions, economists will have an organic field.
May 25, 2021 at 04:14
Faisal Ali Al Zahrani säger
There is no chance for Economists to run outta of jobs?!!

Cause economists are indeed in demand in "High Demand" and economists are aware of automations and risk of losing jobs.

So how the heck you would want a machine to take over the job?? Without human economists our economy will be unstable and not accurate at all.

We need human economists not "machines". Economists are highly important it's our society our life we couldn't live without it.

We don't expect businesses to fail we need to accommodate that.
Feb 24, 2021 at 01:07
Teg (Mycket troligt) säger
Society will reach a steady state where economic policy will be easily automated
Jan 25, 2021 at 02:40
Chris (Ingen chans) säger
Requires outside the box thinking that can't be programmed into a robot
Jan 17, 2021 at 08:46
Yehuda Porath (Låg) säger
I'm an economist. Our "science" is made up of many things. Some of it, like the statistical work and data collection and processing, seems fairly roboticizable.

Much of the rest - The interpretations, the use of theory to explain results, figuring out why the theory often doesn't carry over to the real world, understanding the human behavior behind complex systems of humans messing things up together, figuring out why This Time Is (or isn't) Different - all this requires a great deal of intuition, persuasion, creativity, and intuitive leaps, in addition to the knowledge, information, data, and models we learn.

It doesn't at this time appear that we'll get AI that good within 2 decades. I suppose it's possible, we could hit the Singularity, but I doubt it in that time frame
Oct 12, 2020 at 06:58
Phillip Tussing säger
Ha ha ha! OF COURSE economists will not be replaced! As Ludwig von Mises might say, it is impossible to "do economics" without humans. Ah, but teaching undergraduate economics can be done by pre-recorded videos, with grading done simply and automatically, and supervised by a few economists. And of course all the number-crunching required for corporate economics can be done by algorithms, supervised by a few human economists. And almost all the number-crunching in research work can be done by programs overseen by a few research economists. So... there will still be a few economics jobs...
Aug 10, 2020 at 03:00
rle (Mycket troligt) säger
If economist continue to create use regression analysis only looking at prior data then yes, there is no need to pay an analyst 100K to click a button anyone can do in excel. I've worked to automate these roles & actuarial positions.
Aug 08, 2020 at 02:53
Lol (No chance) säger
The automation of analysis and modeling is a great and useful tool for economists (and actuaries). However, as time goes on, there is exponentially more "prior data" you were using with your automation. As new data is generated every day, we are constantly analyzing it to improve both the assumptions on which we base our models and our modeling techniques themselves.

I agree with you that the field will become automated, but not in the way that you mean it: as a one-time formula where you click a button and "the answer" is computed. Because economics (and actuarial science) are far from being fully understood. Likewise, their models are far from perfect at generating an ideal solution. To achieve a perfect model, all relevant pieces of information regarding how every individual human will make every future decision must be known (which is impossible), but because we have more data and analysis tools every day, the practice of studying economics will continue to be a valuable and profitable area of expertise.
Automation does not mean extinction!!!!
Oct 28, 2020 at 05:44
Tom säger
It doesn't sound like you know what actuaries (and possibly economists) do. The spreadsheets full of calculations are a tool, not the product. The work you're describing is mostly done by uncredentialed junior "actuarial analysts" or even by interns.
Nov 09, 2021 at 06:27
Niko (Ingen chans) säger
The insights change as macro fundamentals change... a computer cannot understand the macro indicators, political influence, sentiment or expectations.. We still do not understand inflation
Jun 25, 2020 at 07:44
Anukul Bodile (Ingen chans) säger
I would have said that AI would replace economists if all humans were this mythical being called Homo economicus, someone who has no social affinities, no lapses of judgement or hang-ups, no capacity even for thinking about anyone besides him or herself.
May 12, 2020 at 09:04
Nerd sry säger
Ahh yes, the assumption that humans are "rational decision-makers" in neoclassical models of economics. These optimization patterns not even close to the way our (non-robot) brains make decisions... Completely agree
Oct 28, 2020 at 05:06
Isaac Lemmen (Ingen chans) säger
It is mostly politics and rhetoric
Mar 06, 2020 at 09:10
Gino (Ingen chans) säger
La economia es la accion humana como diria ludwig von mises es imposible hacer economia sin humanos.

Economics is human action, as Ludwig von Mises would say, it is impossible to do economics without humans.
Jan 07, 2020 at 03:04
levi eleazar de oliveira bezerra (Låg) säger
The economics sector studies human behaviour and is not a matter of exact since it requires creativity and study of society to be able to apply the changes and for this to happen and necessary the accompaniment to the effective result.
Jun 07, 2019 at 12:01

Lämna ett svar om detta yrke

Denna webbplats skyddas av reCAPTCHA och Googles sekretesspolicy och användarvillkor gäller.

Personer tittade också på

Datorprogrammerare
Advokater
Revisorer och revisorer
Finansiella och investeringsanalytiker
Maskiningenjörer