Matemáticos

Baixo Risco
25%
Para Onde Você Gostaria de Ir a Seguir?
Compartilhe seus resultados com amigos e familiares.
Ou, explore esta profissão em maior detalhe...
RISCO DE AUTOMAÇÃO
CALCULADO
28%
(Baixo Risco)
VOTAÇÃO
21%
(Baixo Risco)
Average: 25%
DEMANDA DE TRABALHO
CRESCIMENTO
3,7%
pelo ano 2033
SALÁRIOS
$ 116.440
ou $ 55,98 por hora
Volume
2.220
a partir de 2023
RESUMO
PONTUAÇÃO DO TRABALHO
7,0/10

As pessoas também visualizaram

Risco de automação calculado

28% (Baixo Risco)

Risco Baixo (21-40%): Trabalhos neste nível têm um risco limitado de automação, pois exigem uma mistura de habilidades técnicas e centradas no ser humano.

Mais informações sobre o que é essa pontuação e como ela é calculada estão disponíveis aqui.

Algumas qualidades bastante importantes do trabalho são difíceis de automatizar:

  • Originalidade

Enquete do usuário

21% chance de automação completa nas próximas duas décadas

Nossos visitantes votaram que há uma baixa chance de esta ocupação ser automatizada. Esta avaliação é ainda mais apoiada pelo nível de risco de automação calculado, que estima 28% de chance de automação.

O que você acha que é o risco da automação?

Qual é a probabilidade de que Matemáticos seja substituído por robôs ou inteligência artificial nos próximos 20 anos?






Sentimento

O gráfico a seguir é incluído sempre que há uma quantidade substancial de votos para gerar dados significativos. Essas representações visuais mostram os resultados das enquetes dos usuários ao longo do tempo, fornecendo uma indicação importante das tendências de sentimento.

Sentimento ao longo do tempo (anualmente)

Crescimento

"Crescimento moderado" em relação a outras profissões

Espera-se que o número de vagas de emprego para 'Mathematicians' aumente 3,7% até 2033

Emprego total e estimativa de vagas de emprego

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho para o período entre 2021 e 2031
As projeções atualizadas são devidas 09-2024.

Salários

Muito bem remunerado em relação a outras profissões

Em 2023, o salário anual mediano para 'Mathematicians' foi de $ 116.440, ou $ 55 por hora

'Mathematicians' receberam 142,3% a mais do que o salário médio nacional, que era de $ 48.060

Salários ao longo do tempo

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho

Volume

Faixa de oportunidades de emprego significativamente menor em comparação com outras profissões

A partir de 2023 havia 2.220 pessoas empregadas como 'Mathematicians' dentro dos Estados Unidos.

Isso representa cerca de < 0,001% da força de trabalho empregada em todo o país

Dito de outra maneira, cerca de 1 em 68 mil pessoas são empregadas como 'Mathematicians'.

Descrição do trabalho

Realize pesquisas em matemática fundamental ou na aplicação de técnicas matemáticas à ciência, gestão e outros campos. Resolva problemas em vários campos usando métodos matemáticos.

SOC Code: 15-2021.00

Recursos

Se você está pensando em começar uma nova carreira ou procurando mudar de emprego, criamos uma ferramenta de busca de empregos útil que pode ajudá-lo a conseguir aquele novo papel perfeito.

Pesquise empregos na sua área local

Comentários

Leave a comment

Guest 4 months ago
Aaaand Google DeepMind invented AI (AlphaGeometry 2 and AlphaProof) that solves IMO on silver medal. That escalated quickly...
1 1 Reply
Kevin Gonzalez Gordillo 4 months ago
Lately, I have been studying Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, and I was thinking, could an AI, or even an AGI, discover that in a consistent system of arithmetic, there are true statements that cannot be proven (incomplete system)? I mean the level of self-awareness and nuance that it would take to discover such a theorem and prove it true would be astounding since not even the best mathematicians of Gödel's times were convinced that was the case. So at this level of logic, I would really doubt an AI would take the jobs of people responsible for opening the heart of mathematics and showing the gaping hole of its fundamental flaw; for any mathematician reading this: Let's keep proving the true, the false, and the unprovable truths, and let's "embrace the unknown at the heart of any quest for truth" -(TED-Ed).
1 0 Reply
papo (Sem chance) 5 months ago
Mathematics is a science that is still in discovery, AI will not be able to understand this context
0 0 Reply
skyss0fly (Moderado) 7 months ago
Robots have to utilise logic in their programming using arithmetic skills and therefore use mathematics to perform tasks and as such can compute mathematical tasks quite easily
0 0 Reply
Chickenlover69 4 months ago
Being a mathematician is researching math itself, like science. It needs creativity and human intelligence. For example, I certainly don't think AI can discover or invent complex numbers such as i, i = sqrt(-1). But I think you misunderstood the job of a mathematician as you probably thought that they just solve regular math questions that we already know how to solve, no it's not. Math is part of science and will always will be. Science will never be able to be taken over by AI. Remember that.
0 0 Reply
Anon (Incerto) 11 months ago
Logic can be programmed, so they may be able to eventually prove theorems
0 0 Reply
Europe2048 (Moderado) 1 year ago
Maybe WolframAlpha is taking over?
0 0 Reply
Me (Sem chance) 1 year ago
Mathematical insights rely on human originality.
0 0 Reply
Anish (Altamente provável) 1 year ago
It will simply outclass us in every field.
0 0 Reply
Probabilist 1 year ago
Mathematicians generally find new ideas to solve problems, they also find new questions, whereas AI is just able to copy what already exists and to adapt it to classical situations. But maybe mathematicians will be able to create themself a new AI which will be able to replace them !!
0 0 Reply
Andre (Altamente provável) 1 year ago
People saying this is unlikely are silly. The progress in the field of computer generated proofs has been faster than the progress in AI art. I don't expect any of the Millennium Prize problems to be solved by humans, and I expect them all solved by 2030.
0 0 Reply
Jason 4 months ago
I find it equally silly when you say that none of the Millennium Prize problems will be solved by Humans and all of them will be solved by 2030 (I consider myself an amateur mathematician at best, but from what I understand, the Poincare conjecture has been solved, and the solver, Grigori Perelman I think he's human?) I've hanged out in some mathematics communities and from what I've seen ai has proved some competitive math questions, I guess the four color theorem requires computer assistance, and I've seen Terrence Tao say that Ai could be used to help give Ideas to mathematicians? I've tried searching up ai replacing mathematicians and i only get results of lean which from what i know really only checks if a theorem is right or not. Overall I find the statement that Ai will complete all of the Millennium problems by 2030 to be ridiculous Ai does not seem to be anywhere close to proving some of the most fundamental century old problems in essentially 6 years
2 0 Reply
Carlos (Sem chance) 2 years ago
I believe that even general AI will require a lot of time to reach a level where it can be compared on a full basis to a human in regards to maths.
0 0 Reply
Saurabh Sarkar (Sem chance) 3 years ago
AI was created from Math. Its development is dependent on the development of new Math. It will be next to impossible for AI to develop new functional math.
0 0 Reply
James (Incerto) 3 years ago
Because, AI and supercomputer can overtake the common knowledge
0 0 Reply
Jo 3 years ago
If you've ever done college level math and the number of ways you've been told to "Do it by inspection" and the unconventional method that every solution takes, Math is very unlikely to become automated.
0 0 Reply
AK (Sem chance) 3 years ago
Mathematics can go so far, there are literally so infinite possibilities. That may sound extreme but there are so many number systems out there that mathematicians are uncovering everyday as a team and they still can not find all of them. A computer may be faster but since there are so many possibilities both mathematicians and computers must work TOGETHER.
0 0 Reply
Alex (Baixo) 3 years ago
Mathematics requires quite a bit of creativity, which AI is not capable of.
0 0 Reply
Faisal Ali Al-Zharani 4 years ago
Mathematicians being replaced by AI technology is not a bad idea. But this still upsets some people. Like me yes I'm a little upset but I don't I'll be thinking about creating jobs for mathematicians that hasn't bee in the (mathematics society) something like a direct career path for full time mathematicians. If is that secondary school teaching alright but not other job opportunities provided for mathematicians. I'm still thinking about the medicine field & how are experts in the field medicine are going to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) & also occupations like engineers or scientists.
0 0 Reply
Mon 2 years ago
Which career is most persistent to be replaced by AI according to you?
0 0 Reply
kevin (Baixo) 5 years ago
Mathematics at its core requires a lot of creativity, something which AI is as of yet not good at. However AI will of course play a big role in defining potential research and we already see AI being used to find interesting mathematical patterns that we as humans have overlooked. It will be an aid to us, at least for the short/medium term.
0 0 Reply
seojin (Sem chance) 5 years ago
well at first you need creativity to think about what should he do,
and AI does not have creativity!
so AI could be assistant not mathematicians.
0 0 Reply

Deixe uma resposta sobre esta ocupação

Este site é protegido pelo reCAPTCHA e a Política de Privacidade e Termos de Serviço do Google se aplicam.