Arquitetos, Exceto Paisagistas e Navais

Baixo Risco
21%

Para Onde Você Gostaria de Ir a Seguir?

Compartilhe seus resultados com amigos e familiares.
Obtenha resultados para outro emprego Comparar com outro trabalho

Ou, explore esta profissão em maior detalhe...

Vote Comentários (24)
RISCO DE AUTOMAÇÃO
CALCULADO
0,0%
(Risco Mínimo)
VOTAÇÃO
42%
(Risco Moderado, Com base em 972 votos)
Average: 21%
DEMANDA DE TRABALHO
CRESCIMENTO
7,8%
pelo ano 2033
SALÁRIOS
$ 93.310
ou $ 44,86 por hora
Volume
111.170
a partir de 2023
RESUMO
O que este floco de neve mostra?
O Floco de Neve é um resumo visual das cinco insígnias: Risco de Automação (calculado), Risco (pesquisado), Crescimento, Salários e Volume. Ele oferece um instantâneo do perfil de uma ocupação. A cor do Floco de Neve está relacionada ao seu tamanho. Quanto melhor a ocupação pontua em relação às outras, maior e mais verde o Floco de Neve se torna.
PONTUAÇÃO DO TRABALHO
7,8/10
O que é isto?
Pontuação do Trabalho (quanto maior, melhor):

Nós classificamos os trabalhos usando quatro fatores. Estes são:

- Chance de ser automatizado
- Crescimento do trabalho
- Salários
- Volume de posições disponíveis

Estes são alguns pontos chave para pensar quando estiver procurando um emprego.

As pessoas também visualizaram

Programadores de Computador Advogados Engenheiros Civis Designers Gráficos Desenvolvedores Web

Risco de automação calculado

0,0% (Risco Mínimo)

Risco Mínimo (0-20%): Ocupações nesta categoria têm uma baixa probabilidade de serem automatizadas, pois geralmente exigem resolução complexa de problemas, criatividade, fortes habilidades interpessoais e um alto grau de destreza manual. Esses trabalhos geralmente envolvem movimentos de mão intrincados e coordenação precisa, tornando difícil para as máquinas replicarem as tarefas necessárias.

Mais informações sobre o que é essa pontuação e como ela é calculada estão disponíveis aqui.

Algumas qualidades muito importantes do trabalho são difíceis de automatizar:

  • Originalidade

Algumas qualidades bastante importantes do trabalho são difíceis de automatizar:

  • Percepção Social

  • Belas Artes

  • Persuasão

  • Negociação

Enquete do usuário

42% chance de automação completa nas próximas duas décadas

Nossos visitantes votaram que estão incertos se esta ocupação será automatizada. No entanto, os funcionários podem encontrar tranquilidade no nível de risco automatizado que geramos, que mostra 0,0% de chance de automação.

O que você acha que é o risco da automação?

Qual é a probabilidade de que Arquitetos, Exceto Paisagistas e Navais seja substituído por robôs ou inteligência artificial nos próximos 20 anos?

Sentimento

O gráfico a seguir é exibido onde há votos suficientes para produzir dados significativos. Ele mostra os resultados das enquetes dos usuários ao longo do tempo, fornecendo uma indicação clara das tendências de sentimento.

Sentimento ao longo do tempo (anualmente)

Crescimento

Crescimento muito rápido em relação a outras profissões

Espera-se que o número de vagas de emprego para 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' aumente 7,8% até 2033

Emprego total e estimativa de vagas de emprego

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho para o período entre 2023 e 2033
As projeções atualizadas são devidas 09-2025.

Salários

Muito bem remunerado em relação a outras profissões

Em 2023, o salário anual mediano para 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' foi de 93.310 $, ou 45 $ por hora

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' receberam 94,2% a mais do que o salário médio nacional, que era de 48.060 $

Salários ao longo do tempo

* Dados do Bureau de Estatísticas do Trabalho

Volume

Maior gama de oportunidades de emprego comparado a outras profissões

A partir de 2023 havia 111.170 pessoas empregadas como 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' dentro dos Estados Unidos.

Isso representa cerca de 0,07% da força de trabalho empregada em todo o país

Dito de outra maneira, cerca de 1 em 1 mil pessoas são empregadas como 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'.

Descrição do trabalho

Planeje e projete estruturas, como residências particulares, edifícios de escritórios, teatros, fábricas e outras propriedades estruturais.

SOC Code: 17-1011.00

Comentários (24)

Deixe um comentário
Sawyer (Baixo)
10 set 2024 22:41
It needs to pour your soul into it to really make a breakthrough. Robots don't have souls
sama
23 dez 2022 19:30
An architect is more than a concept or a few words. It's about thinking, conceptualizing, and making it a reality.
Michael E. (Baixo)
08 dez 2025 01:00
A low chance for full automation of the profession itself because of the significant risk to human health, safety, and welfare involved -- people are generally less willing to accept a computer program as the ultimate responsible party for their safety. However, a high chance for partial automation of certain aspects of the profession, especially repetitive low-risk tasks such as detail selection (from a library of previously drawn details, not freshly AI-generated ones) and high-volume design iterations.
x (Baixo)
27 nov 2025 10:54
law. someone needs to be responsible financially and legally for the outcome and possible mistakes + some projects [military] are secret and even cannot be made on computer with internet
oscar walker (Sem chance)
02 abr 2025 00:59
blend of creativity and problem solving to design spaces that align with the environment surrounding. Very low to no chance of being replaced by robots and AI in comparison to other industries.
Ben Bailey (Incerto)
21 fev 2024 21:15
I would love to have AI assist in automating the aspects of Architecture that are tedious, like making sure everything is up to code or automatically adjusting things after moving something else, but I fear that people will become lazy and let AI do the job for them.
Yoshimata R
25 abr 2023 17:55
This will not be popular, but our firm already uses AI: clients type in or speak their ideas and examples The programs we use come up with a myriad of solutions that the clients themselves can then configure and reconfigure at will with all structural processes, including loadbearing etc. built-in throughout the process. 16 of the 38 people at our firm have been laid off since this started.
:))) (Moderado)
03 ago 2022 00:16
Currently, as a student at one of the top architecture schools, I can observe how the most successful students utilize AI. It's clear to see how it improves their workflow and design progress, even as early as 2022.

Already, AI can handle most of the work for an architect. I believe that the next 20 years will further popularize AI within the profession, reducing the amount of work done manually.
Sebastian from Argentina (Baixo)
14 nov 2019 12:33
Creativity from architects mind couldn't be replaced by AI, But some typical architecture room plans, could be systematized by machine learning on cad programs, like actual libraries of equipment, it could be library of rooms, baths, etc.
Lilly (Baixo)
12 ago 2019 22:55
I think it would be quite hard for robots to take clients ideas for architecture and turn it into a floorplan since there are billions of ways to build a house.
David J Gill
24 abr 2019 22:43
More effective design software will raise productivity and reduce the number of staff required to complete project documents.
Marta (Incerto)
15 fev 2023 23:56
I totally agree. Students and young professionals may have problem with finding a job. Nowadays, they usually do repetitive CAD drawings/models (the main concept was designed by e.g. senior architect), and it all can be automated, especially with BIM
Dean B
26 mar 2019 03:54
This is an art form that’s practical so I don’t see it going
Mark (Sem chance)
08 jul 2024 18:20
There is no possible way for AI to take over architecture. To start, a computer cannot hold legal liability. AI doesn’t create; it only copies and reproduces. On a regular basis, my job requires unique solutions and details that cannot be pulled from other sources.

We need to take too many unrelated factors into account for any particular design, versus the cost and time it would take for an AI to be developed to take the job. It would never be profitable for the AI developer. Besides, they wouldn't want the liability risk we have for a mistake that can cost lives.
HMS (Sem chance)
15 mar 2023 06:49
Architects are a lot like an artist. AI cannot create cannot something that requires human originality. No two architects are the same, just as two pieces of art are not the same. Architecture requires you to put creativity, originality, emotion, and the social aspect into your work.
J (Incerto)
15 out 2019 03:22
Depends on the kind of architecture, the way that the industry itself thinks about what architecture means (an engineering/optimization problem versus art, desire to rapidly customize vs work on the process with other humans) and what clients demand.
pgm777
29 ago 2019 12:26
computerisation will help and not hinder the architectural profession. Automisation is something that has no place
Mark (Incerto)
02 mai 2023 19:29
Until recently (through March and April 2023), and after having seen the work that Dall-e 2 had produced, I thought it incredibly likely. The argument that architects would still be required seemed to hinge on "you need to interface with a human to get a building built", but I don't think that's true (if a client could save tens of thousands of dollars by inputting their requests on a keyboard, rather than talking to a person, they'd opt for the latter). However, the one aspect of the job that's overlooked is LIABILITY. Currently architects are legally liable for the work they produce, and any failings over that work. AI offers no LIABILITY -- and I highly doubt the software design companies who are producing that AI are willing to accept liability -- and until someone, or a team of someones, is willing to accept that legal responsibility, AI shouldn't be able to threaten that job. However, I said "could go either way" because it's highly possible that people are so stupid, that they would sign a contract that frees the AI architect of liability if it meant they could save a few dollars on fees.
phamiliar
08 mar 2024 20:19
It is likely that AI could be the architectural designer and code checker while a civil engineer is responsible for the life and safety of the overall design. I think the job won't necessarily go away its just that there will be many production staff jobs that will be eliminated.
king rocker (Altamente provável)
24 fev 2022 14:51
LOL it's already dead. Almost no one hires architects now, there are so many tools that already do their job. Wake up, it's game over for this one. The site is way behind the times.
I'dRatherNotInputAName (Sem chance)
27 out 2023 20:41
"LOL it's already dead."
Source? Or did it come to you in a dream?
Sameer
29 fev 2024 12:01
AI isn’t that capable to satisfy the client with the structure design… however it could help to make the work easy but it can’t overtake the profession.
Aleksandra (Moderado)
17 mai 2023 14:43
Projects' created by humans will be for the 1% of richest people who will have a fantasy and need to show off that their projects was done the "expensive way" by a human and not 80/20 rule by AI. What people don't understand is that atm 80% of society is more faulty than AI. Working with AI is a bliss comparing to working with a majority of employees as well as moody specialists on the market is simply a bliss. And we're only starting here...
Architect Downow
10 fev 2023 14:34
Architectural and Interior Design are both iterative processes.
AI will improve this process, detail all the structural draws, and create layouts and floorplans more efficiently than ever.

With solar, water, food and waste visions that now only a few architects embrace in projects.
Leed will be integrated in AI and civil engineering as well.

I guess in the future, anyone can design a house with the help of AI.

Architects, Lawyers and Doctors, the tríade of "good money" will fall.
And me and my boys are working to achieve this as soon as possible.

Deixe uma resposta sobre esta ocupação
0/8000