Inżynierowie lotnictwa i kosmonautyki

39% (Niskie ryzyko)

Niskie ryzyko (21-40%): Zawody na tym poziomie mają ograniczone ryzyko automatyzacji, ponieważ wymagają połączenia umiejętności technicznych i skoncentrowanych na człowieku.

Więcej informacji na temat tego, czym jest ten wynik i jak jest obliczany, jest dostępne tutaj.

Ankieta użytkownika

Nastroje

Poniższy wykres jest zamieszczany wszędzie tam, gdzie istnieje znaczna liczba głosów, aby przedstawić istotne dane. Te wizualne reprezentacje pokazują wyniki ankiet użytkowników w czasie, dostarczając istotnych wskazówek dotyczących trendów nastrojów.

Płace

Bardzo wysoko opłacany w porównaniu do innych profesji

W 2023, mediana rocznej pensji dla 'Aerospace Engineers' wynosiła 130 720 $, czyli 62 $ za godzinę.

'Aerospace Engineers' otrzymali wynagrodzenie wyższe o 172,0% od średniej krajowej, która wynosiła 48 060 $

Płace z biegiem czasu

Komentarze

Leave a comment

A (Umiarkowany) 14 days ago

AI is still advancing at an alarming rate and is even capable of performing very complex mathematical calculations pertaining to the field compared to 2 years ago.

Whilst right now it can compare your suggestions on a particular design and leave you to figure out the best course of action, that itself might change in the future given how fast its reasoning is improving

0 0 Reply

High school freshmen 10000038 (Niepewny) 21 days ago

The robots might be able to design the best aircraft but they can’t account for ersonal flare and other human factors like tailoring to a certain government officials tastes so you get chosen.

0 0 Reply

Alex (Niski) 4 months ago

Aerospace engineering requires human creativity that AI simply lacks

2 1 Reply

Sven H. (Bardzo prawdopodobne) 9 months ago

I believe this profession is at high risk of being taken over by AI. Although the job does require creativity, it is highly possible that in the future, humans will enter a prompt (for the design of an aircraft), and the AI will create a 3-D model of the prompt.

0 9 Reply

London Smith 25 days ago

If CATIA v5 is any indicator, there’s quite a bit of time for AI to figure out how to CAD model

0 0 Reply

wefjiboeu (Nie ma szans) 1 year ago

The engineering of this kind of stuff requires sudden changes and the human mind

6 3 Reply

Felipe Duarte Padilha (Nie ma szans) 1 year ago

Airplanes or general aircraft are extremely complicated machinery that would need AI inside of the craft to be engineered. It is also extremely costly and would most likely not be able for it to be replaced.

4 6 Reply

Nirmal Teja (Nie ma szans) 1 year ago

It's almost impossible to any type of artificial intelligence to think out of the box as a human thoughts go there is no limit to human creativity but the artificial intelligence is limited even after decades..

4 3 Reply

James (Nie ma szans) 2 years ago

Needs innovation and creativity

4 3 Reply

singe rapide 8 months ago

So ?

0 5 Reply

Aero (Niski) 2 years ago

Required novel application of physics

2 4 Reply

L.M. (Nie ma szans) 2 years ago

the risk of even a slight failure could prevent an ai that could replace this job from ever leaving development

3 2 Reply

duck (Niepewny) 2 years ago

Engineering is a difficult job and with the precision of present machines, they could make things more accurate than human hands. The only downside is a machine/robot can't make full decisions, Humans are able to go through options and choose the best one based on circumstance. Robots can't do that... yet

2 2 Reply

Bagle 1 year ago

pls don't tel me me future profssion will b replaced by AI

0 3 Reply

Kauã (Nie ma szans) 2 years ago

No way people trust building ROCKETS to A.I.S

5 3 Reply

Sawle (Niepewny) 2 years ago

It really depends on how we see it, if we as engineers use AI to our advantage and adapt it's positives we can easily stay in the field, but if we step aside then you know what will happen eventually.
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.

1 2 Reply

BibirMengkeroet (Niski) 3 years ago

Applying for a position as an Aerospace Engineer is already challenging. It's also a job where, if something goes wrong even in the slightest, the financial losses could be enormous.

Take a look at the 2013 Proton rocket crash. It occurred because the engineer installed the rotation sensors upside down, causing it to plummet to the ground. Such a small mistake resulted in $65 million dollars in losses.

However, it could be possible that AI will create more efficient propulsion designs in the future.

1 4 Reply

A (Umiarkowany) 3 years ago

Because we could use robots to design and build the aircraft and do the calculations for us.

1 3 Reply

Rick 2 years ago

Robots currently lack the creative ability and proccessing power to do complex designing, so as of the near future its not likely it will be taken over.

1 3 Reply

Saltine (Niepewny) 3 years ago

Some aspects like assembly could be covered by robots but idk if the design and testing process can

1 3 Reply

Bret (Niski) 4 years ago

It's a complex job. Many constraints need to be accounted for. A computer just may not be as good at it.

2 2 Reply

N (Small Chance) 4 years ago

I personally do not believe that rocket scientists/aerospace engineers will be overthrown by AI/robots because it requires complex math, complex designing, and building. I do understand that AI will improve over the years, but I don't see robots doing a job like this. Though I do see them helping around. This scares me as they could probably move up a position.

1 3 Reply

G (Nie ma szans) 4 years ago

This job designs vehicles that are specifically made for aeronautical and astronautical transportation. It is a highly creative job that requires thinking outside the box.

1 3 Reply

Nicolas (Nie ma szans) 4 years ago

aerospace engineering is an area that needs innovation and creativity, always discovering new things and not always doing the same task, testing new materials and things that have never been used are constant tasks, etc.

2 3 Reply