Overzicht
Automatiseringsrisico
2. Gebruikerspeiling
3. Groei
4. Loon
5. Volume
Beschrijving
Middelen
Opmerkingen

Schrijvers en Auteurs

Matig Risico
54%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
60%
(Hoog Risico)
PEILING
47%
(Matig Risico)
Average: 54%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
5,1%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 73.690
of $ 35,42 per uur
Volume
49.450
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
4,9/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Computerprogrammeurs
Advocaten
Grafisch Ontwerpers
Acteurs
Webontwikkelaars

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

60% (Hoog Risico)

Hoge Risico (61-80%): Banen in deze categorie lopen een aanzienlijk risico door automatisering, aangezien veel van hun taken gemakkelijk kunnen worden geautomatiseerd met behulp van huidige of nabije toekomstige technologieën.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

  • Overtuiging

  • Sociale Waarneming

Impact of Chat GPT on this occupation

We've received many comments and emails about Chat GPT and it's impact on this occupation. It's very impressive software, so people are understandably worried and/or excited.

However, something important to note with regards to the score we've calculated here, is that this occupation is comprised of many different types of job roles. Some examples of these include Advertising Writer, Blurb Writer, Copywriter and Screenwriter.

Some roles/tasks are more susceptible than other's to being automated by Chat GPT, but the score we've calculated is one that's an amalgamation of all of them.

Unfortunately, the source for our data (o*net) doesn't split this category up to the individual roles, so we can't calculate a score for each of them. If they do at some point in the future, we'll do the same, and generate scores accordingly.

Writing occupations aren't dead, but they are changing, so the best advice we can offer is to keep up to date with the latest developments, and use the tools available to your advantage.

Gebruikerspeiling

47% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat ze niet zeker weten of dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. De automatiseringsrisicograad die we echter hebben gegenereerd, suggereert een veel hogere kans op automatisering: 60% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Schrijvers en Auteurs binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Sentiment over tijd (per kwartaal)

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Matige groei ten opzichte van andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Writers and Authors' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 5,1% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Hoog betaald in vergelijking met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Writers and Authors' $ 73.690, of $ 35 per uur

'Writers and Authors' werden 53,3% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Matige reeks van werkmogelijkheden in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 49.450 mensen in dienst als 'Writers and Authors' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer < 0,001% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 3 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Writers and Authors'.

Functieomschrijving

Creëer en bereid schriftelijk materiaal voor, zoals scripts, verhalen, advertenties en ander materiaal.

SOC Code: 27-3043.00

Middelen

Will Chat GPT spell the end of blogging?

Here's a very informative video from Ricky Kesler from Income School about Chat GPT as it relates to blogging (and SEO). We think it contains great advice, and can be applied to all sorts of writing job roles, not just bloggers.

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Hope (Laag) 8 days ago
GPT and other AI generators may be able to write stories, but they don't come anywhere near human-written stories. Whenever asked to write a story, they always write it in a certain form, with similar plots. Nothing new or exciting. Plus, all humans think differently, so it would be impossible to model and AI that can think like every human. As a young author, I try to write stories outside the box that would be difficult for an AI to try replicating.
0 0 Reply
Sophie (Onzeker) 2 months ago
LLM or Large Language Models like ChatGPT only outputs the material humans write. It also has no creativity, all outputs are based on our interactions, prompts and the existing data. Who creates that data? We do. We write our hearts, emotions out on a piece of writing, causing it to influence people, and we shape the way a person's bias works. What GPT outputs is something emotionless and cannot sway people. How much times have you been through sorrow from reading a book? How much times have you felt sorrow from a piece of text? Probably none.
0 2 Reply
Laurel 3 months ago
I'm an author, and I just thought I'd share my take on this. While it's true that AI can't replicate human emotions and experiences, it has proven to be capable of writing average stories. Too many people consume media without a critical eye. As long as people as a whole start to care more about quality media, we should be fine.
0 0 Reply
Adria Donohue (Laag) 3 months ago
Because at the current moment AI does not have to opacity to write a full length story without it being very repetitive and forgetting itself, and will only get worse as time goes on. Furthermore, an AI lacks the very human and unique emotion that a person can write into the story. I have tampered with the world of Artificial Intelligence before, and all the characters it portrays seem to be the same personality, like they've been copy and pasted. This is a problem AI struggles with that even humans suffer with, but humans are more able to fix this fatal error that can ruin a story.
0 0 Reply
Ele (Low) 4 months ago
As a writer myself, AI doesn't scare me because it lacks what writing and stories originally entail: experience. You can have a fantasy dystopia story written by ChatGPT, but it can never hold up to the bar human-made fantasy dystopian stories have set. Why? These stories contain human experiences, they contain a message that authors wish to convey, experiences authors wish to convey. It's the humanity that stories hold that make them loved by people. Any text-based AI can write a story, but will it ever hold the same impact to a story an actual person wrote? No, because AI hasn't experienced anything actual people have experienced. It only "sees" what people witness and puts it into its generation without second thought. The reason people consume stories is because they can relate to it, they learn something from it. I know AI helps breakdown and teach things we can't understand by piecing together information from the internet faster than we can, but for it to write a story? Fat chance. Writing is more than just fast money content (that, sadly, already is in today's times) it is a form of art that records experiences and messages that cannot be conveyed with straightforwardness. It is something that holds bits and pieces of humanity, of someone's memories, of messages that are so big that it can never fit in a simple sentence. No matter how many years it will take, AI can never catch up with how high the bar has been set when it comes to writing.
2 0 Reply
try (Onzeker) 4 months ago
the originality of writing would be the most difficult to program a bot to do.
0 0 Reply
Ray (Laag) 4 months ago
Robots will never be able to copy real writers' creativity, although they could help you write a short essay for school, AI cannot do original and creative writing.
2 0 Reply
Human # 7,522,997,653 (Laag) 4 months ago
I don't really think AI will take over writing. In my eyes, AI will never capture the thrilling, magical, real experience that humans can create.

Although they have a chance, AI can never reach the same level of imagination that we humans have when it comes to stories and fiction.

Though I have very little hope for humanity in the future, I still believe humans can change for the better.
3 0 Reply
R H DARNELL (Laag) 5 months ago
Real writing uses creativity. AI is not creative, AI can only use what you input. It can rhyme, and write grammatically correct sentences, but it cannot convey emotion or elicit a response on a human level. I believe it could write a "good" outline, but not a good screenplay, much less a great book.
2 0 Reply
Pasi (Geen kans) 5 months ago
It depends on the author, but currently the AI simply can not write a good book.
1 0 Reply
Chris Ochs (Matig) 7 months ago
News and nonfiction are high. Fantasy, sci-fi, horror novels far less so.
2 0 Reply
Dom (Laag) 7 months ago
Creativity, novelty, capturing the social, invention.
2 0 Reply
Rebecca (Laag) 7 months ago
Because robots tend to be predictable and writers need imagination and I don't see robots having that
2 0 Reply
Philip Whittebane (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 7 months ago
At least many blurb and screenwriting jobs could be automated. Although there would still be the requirement for some level of creativity
2 0 Reply
Tomoko Julius (Geen kans) 7 months ago
i doubt that any time soon the originality of the human touch will fade away with the coming in of AI. It simply cannot. PERIOD!!!
0 0 Reply
Mike (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 8 months ago
Highly only because ChatGPT is used for writing, and it can be used in story making
0 0 Reply
copper (Geen kans) 8 months ago
the robots simply lack the creativity of a good author like J.K.Rowling or Suzanne Collins.
0 0 Reply
Penguin (Geen kans) 8 months ago
Robots cannot have experiences. They just spit out a cacophony of random words with no care as to a message or logic or ethics.
0 0 Reply
M (Laag) 10 months ago
In the United States, creative material developed by AI cannot be trademarked and therefore unprofitable.
0 0 Reply
David 5 months ago
To be fair, it's difficult to tell whether or not a text was written by AI, especially if the person who generated the prompt refactored the text.
0 0 Reply
Dakshay (Matig) 11 months ago
If AI keeps improving, certainly studios will start using AI generated scripts to make movies/tv shows/ books. They will be garbage generic stuff in the beginning but at one point AI will certainly be able to write as well as a human. So writers working for studios will be in danger. But I think big established authors like Brandon Sanderson, have planned projects for decades later. And people will still buy their books because they love the stories. I think if you can cultivate a community of dedicated fans, you can definitely make a killing (or at least a livable income.)
Personally, I would hate to see the art of storytelling to be turned over to machines.
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.