Special Effects Kunstenaars en Animators

Hoog Risico
61%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
70%
(Hoog Risico)
PEILING
53%
(Matig Risico)
Average: 61%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
4,3%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 99.060
of $ 47,62 per uur
Volume
29.940
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
4,8/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

70% (Hoog Risico)

Hoge Risico (61-80%): Banen in deze categorie lopen een aanzienlijk risico door automatisering, aangezien veel van hun taken gemakkelijk kunnen worden geautomatiseerd met behulp van huidige of nabije toekomstige technologieën.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

Gebruikerspeiling

53% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat ze niet zeker weten of dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. De automatiseringsrisicograad die we echter hebben gegenereerd, suggereert een veel hogere kans op automatisering: 70% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Special Effects Kunstenaars en Animators binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Sentiment over tijd (per kwartaal)

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Matige groei ten opzichte van andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 4,3% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' $ 99.060, of $ 47 per uur

'Special Effects Artists and Animators' werden 106,1% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Lager bereik van werkgelegenheden vergeleken met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 29.940 mensen in dienst als 'Special Effects Artists and Animators' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer < 0,001% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 5 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Special Effects Artists and Animators'.

Functieomschrijving

Creëer speciale effecten of animaties met behulp van film, video, computers of andere elektronische hulpmiddelen en media voor gebruik in producten, zoals computerspellen, films, muziekvideo's en commercials.

SOC Code: 27-1014.00

Middelen

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Ele (Low) 4 months ago
As an artist, I'd give some doubt to this because I've seen the ropes done behind animation. Sure, AI can recreate animation, but at the same time it will not hold a candle to the quality human-made animation has. The way it constantly shifts between several art styles because it farms stolen media it's been fed which leads to major inconsistencies. Much more, it's rather impossible to make an "original" animated short made entirely out of AI. Why? Consistency (and originality) are the reason. I find that AI "generalizes" images to be able to create an image, which is difficult especially when it comes to pushing facial expressions because AI needs to farm hundreds of images to "understand" how to recreate the image. I don't think it's possible in the long run either because at some point in time IF society and the industry as a whole decides to just USE AI for everything, there's gonna be a lot of "inbreeding" happening. AI will feed on other AI because there's not gonna be anymore human-made images it can freely farm off of which results to the most whacked quality you'd think of. AI will make the most general looking animation that can ever exist, but that thing will lack the soul, the humanity, human-made animations have.
9 0 Reply
Sundew (Matig) 4 months ago
Because a.i can already generate videos n stuff
0 4 Reply
August Nelson (Matig) 4 months ago
With all the art AIs we already have, it is inevitable.
0 3 Reply
human (Laag) 4 months ago
originality and high quality
2 1 Reply
Moss (Onzeker) 4 months ago
Ai is smart, but also stupid. In time it could, but we dont know for sure.
1 2 Reply
bob (Matig) 5 months ago
ai is getting better at making automated vidseos
0 2 Reply
Aaron (Geen kans) 5 months ago
This requires soul and robots can’t replicate the soul that humans produce. Bad or otherwise.
6 1 Reply
Aizen 5 months ago
I saw a lot of highly likely comments, so as an artist I thought I should give my point of view.
I don’t think ai can replace these types of jobs as if you wanted to actually make a movie or series, you would still need a good plot and a storyboard and color for at least one frame and for the ending and beginning scene or else how would you make a movie that follows the exact plot and looks that you want. (if your an in-between artists.. uhhhh-)
an example would be any ghibli film. even if ai were to create a movie and make it look exactly the same, it’s not as appealing because every ghibli film not only takes years to make but uses traditional animation and hand draw each frame and that’s what makes it appealing and different from other films not because an ai made it in just 5 seconds.
5 0 Reply
Ahmed (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 5 months ago
Simply because of the hyper realistic AI that’s making these videos it’s becoming hard to tell what is real and what isn’t personally I think it’s going to be worse but it’s a high chance it may take over
0 3 Reply
Jason Chen (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 5 months ago
sora ai and generative video models can have a text input create any video or film imagery now, hence no need for armies of humans creating these works of digital art.
0 3 Reply
P3S4NT (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 5 months ago
ai art, it steals pieces of art without permission and merges them into something else.
1 2 Reply
Max Sky (Matig) 6 months ago
ai animation could become super avalible from OpenAI Sora, ngl its scary, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1YEX4t79e0Q
0 2 Reply
no >:( (Laag) 6 months ago
copyright and laws and stuff
2 0 Reply
Max Sky 6 months ago
it could change in the future you never know.
0 2 Reply
Bryan (student) 7 months ago
With the amount of new technology and AI coming through the years, people may think about robotic replacement in the industry of artists/designers. I don’t completely agree with them (maybe because I do want to make it my job in the future) but there will always have a limit and as we all know, technology, AI, computer, programming, etc… are made by humans. For me, technology should assist humans, doing daily task for example. But not replace them. And as we all says, they don’t have the originality, creativity of human being.
0 0 Reply
Ro (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 9 months ago
Sora AI
0 2 Reply
james adamson 10 months ago
Everyone here is looking at this from the perspective of a creative. I am also in that bucket, but when the bean counters see something cheaper and more efficient the little nuances and facets of human beauty and creativity will not be considered.
A powerful and forceful director/CEO/MD on board could swing that in human creativity's favour, but look at all the areas in production where the money goes for the lowest common denominator.
Art and money are not good bedfellows and AI art like plastic and industrial streamlining are where we are headed unfortunately.( IMHO.)While we got a bit cleverer at being efficient we will also get A LOT cheaper a lot saddder and A LOT more unpleasant on the eye!

From DaVinci to plastic impressions and AI interpretations of beauty.
I'm thinking of the film Brazil and a horrendous retail park I visited in LA! Gaudy gossip magazines cheap toy shops and the show Black Mirror!
0 0 Reply
armando camero 10 months ago
you'll be replaced by AI if the client is okay with 'good enough' . but you won't if the client needs minor detail adjustments and lots of precision and control
0 0 Reply
Navarone (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 1 year ago
Im a 3D rigging artist with 5+ years in the industry and if things keep going the way they are, i think that by 2040, 3D art is going to be just a few directors and producers using AI instead of a pipeline.
Art is dead.
0 1 Reply
JD (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 1 year ago
AI art is already being embraced in small ways. the complexity and quality is only going to grow out of convenience to bigger animation companies, and demand from film production studios.
0 1 Reply
Joe 1 year ago
If you'd posed this question to me just two years ago, my response would have been a firm "absolutely not." However, given the emergence of advanced AI generative models, my current perspective leans towards a scenario in which the role may not vanish entirely, but instead undergo a substantial reduction in workforce. So the hundreds of visual effects artists typically employed in a film's production might dwindle down to 5-10 individuals
0 1 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.