Natuurkundigen

Minimaal Risico
9%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
0,6%
(Minimaal Risico)
PEILING
18,2%
(Minimaal Risico)
Average: 9%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
7,2%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 155.680
of $ 74,84 per uur
Volume
18.350
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
8,3/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

0,6% (Minimaal Risico)

Minimaal Risico (0-20%): Beroepen in deze categorie hebben een lage kans op automatisering, omdat ze doorgaans complexe probleemoplossing, creativiteit, sterke interpersoonlijke vaardigheden en een hoge mate van handvaardigheid vereisen. Deze banen omvatten vaak ingewikkelde handbewegingen en precieze coördinatie, waardoor het moeilijk is voor machines om de vereiste taken te repliceren.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele zeer belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Sociale Waarneming

  • Overtuiging

Gebruikerspeiling

18,2% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een minimale kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 0,6% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Natuurkundigen binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Snelle groei vergeleken met andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Physicists' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 7,2% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Physicists' $ 155.680, of $ 74 per uur

'Physicists' werden 223,9% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Lager bereik van werkgelegenheden vergeleken met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 18.350 mensen in dienst als 'Physicists' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer < 0,001% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 8 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Physicists'.

Functieomschrijving

Voer onderzoek uit naar fysieke fenomenen, ontwikkel theorieën op basis van observatie en experimenten, en bedenk methoden om fysieke wetten en theorieën toe te passen.

SOC Code: 19-2012.00

Middelen

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

az09 (Geen kans) 11 days ago
Its the last job that'll get taken over; if it does, we're not working anyways
0 0 Reply
Hugo klatovsky (Geen kans) 26 days ago
I am a PhD physicist and i am not noticing any robots in my physics department
0 0 Reply
Guest 2 months ago
AI already taking over math (in summer 2024 AI reached silver medal at IMO) so I think physics is next in order to be replaced and automated... So math and physics very related to each other so there no chance for both of them
0 0 Reply
Anonymous (Laag) 3 months ago
Honestly, robots only have have so much processing power, and with today’s tech, (and possibly tomorrow’s) it’s just not possible to run such complex calculations.
0 0 Reply
E (Geen kans) 3 months ago
Physics requires complex models and creativity that artificial intelligence can not replicate without a human mind.
0 0 Reply
Oliver Cavendish 3 months ago
differentiating between experimental and theoretical physicists, i think that there is a chance that experimental physics will be replaced by automation in the near future especially as nuclear engineering also comes under this bracket and the militaries of major world powers such as America, China and India are looking to incorporate more cyber-warfare and robotics into their offensive (and defensive) technologies and there is also a high chance that as other fields like chemistry, for example, begin to get automated, experimental physics will too. but theoretical physics, on the other hand, is the purest discipline of science there is. it requires originality, innovation, creativity, fun, a genuine interest in science and physics for its own sake and the ability to make coherent theories and hypotheses based on observations and data gathered of and from natural phenomena. this, at least in the near future, is something that AI is thoroughly incapable of doing. so on the whole, no, theo.physicists' shouldn't be going anywhere; exp.physicists on the other hand..............unless, of course, elon surprises us again with a sentient AI that can actually take over everything and become the next SkyNet!
1 1 Reply
Saket (Laag) 6 months ago
I think that robots will not be able to find new things as of right now they can only use a database and find things out of there a robot doesnt have enough creativity to look out into space for example and think"Hmm why is it moving" for something htat shouldnt move it is just gonna see it and be like"cool"
1 0 Reply
Samik Yanque Amable (Geen kans) 6 months ago
A pure science is a kind of art where your creativity must shine to observe problems and devise solutions. The truth is, it hurts to think that my future will be filled with the anxiety of "finding a problem" that is relevant to science, but it's the hell I chose.

If any junior reads this message, I can only wish you the best. While your work is irreplaceable by AI, your future will be filled with problems where AI cannot assist you. Good luck.
2 0 Reply
Alec 6 months ago
Thank you. I am 12, and this is my dream job. Seeing this message really made me excited!
2 1 Reply
9 (Geen kans) 1 year ago
We teach AI. That's how it understands. Although it can learn, it can't accumulate pure factual knowledge by itself.
0 0 Reply
Jamie (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 1 year ago
Hard science fields will be the easiest fields for AI to take-over.
0 2 Reply
MainEditor 9 months ago
But if AI can do hard science why it wouldn't as easy do soft science?
1 0 Reply
Zuzia (Matig) 1 year ago
AI can already teach itself new things and it escalates very quickly, it probably will be able to analyze all the knowledge we have on Earth and come to some important conclusions.
1 0 Reply
Samuel (Geen kans) 1 year ago
It requires thinking outside the box, solving new problems, writing new programs. It has already implemented computers for calculations.
0 0 Reply
Toast (Geen kans) 1 year ago
Being a physicist requires, at least to a certain degree, being able to come up with purely original ideas, rather than interpolating the existing body of knowledge.
3 0 Reply
Quarked_Out (Laag) 1 year ago
Hmm, a lot of areas in physics do incorporate ML techniques and AI to some degree. However, people with physics training play an undisputedly dominant role in research.

If anything, I can see some simulation aspects or redundant experimental procedures being automated in the near term. But parts that incorporate creative problem solving or the physical intuition needed in determining directions to take research are things that are pretty safeguarded to humans for a bit.

I think those "intuitions" are very difficult to map to general problem-solving algorithms.
0 0 Reply
Brian (No Chance) 2 years ago
Many other experimental physicists and I already automate every measurement we can, but there is still plenty of work to do.
1 0 Reply
David (Geen kans) 2 years ago
I wonder what all those people were thinking when they said there was a realistic possibility that physicists will be obsolete in 20 years. That's absurd on its face and every physicist I have ever met would agree.

We can have a discussion on whether it is possible in the next 200 years, sure, but 20 years? That's laughable. Given that only physicists are qualified to write, train, and optimize the algorithms that would be used to replace them, it will take a long, long, long time.

I suspect that we would need true machine sentience before we could actually start to talk about replacing theoretical and mathematical physicists.
0 0 Reply
Bimsara Bodaragama (Geen kans) 2 years ago
It's more about intuition and innovativeness. Of course, we will use more tools, but with Physics, since we interpret as we observe (there is a little problem with that conclusion, though), AI may not be able to take it over.
0 0 Reply
Wesley I (Geen kans) 3 years ago
I believe that it will be possible but not for a very long time, the process of positing new questions and then solving them is rather complex and I'm guessing that it will be at least 100 years before the jobs of theoretical physicists start to become threatened.
0 0 Reply
just bored (Geen kans) 3 years ago
Even though computers may get more intelligent than us humans, there is still a very small chance because computers don't have the basic questioning ability which we humans have
0 0 Reply
Rowan (Onzeker) 3 years ago
The development of AI is rapidly improving, AI maybe 10 years in the future being able to predict or understand the universe better through random generation or pure knowledge is very probable. However I doubt they will replace Physicists in the near decade it should be very increasingly possible.
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.