Wiskundigen

Laag Risico
29%

Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?

Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Krijg resultaten voor een andere baan Vergelijk met een andere baan

Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...

Stem Opmerkingen (25)
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
28%
(Laag Risico)
PEILING
30%
(Laag Risico, Gebaseerd op 639 stemmen)
Average: 29%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
3,7%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 116.440
of $ 55,98 per uur
Volume
2.220
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
Wat laat deze sneeuwvlok zien?
De Sneeuwvlok is een visuele samenvatting van de vijf badges: Automatiseringsrisico (berekend), Risico (gepeild), Groei, Salarissen en Volume. Het geeft je een directe momentopname van een beroepsprofiel. De kleur van de Sneeuwvlok hangt samen met de grootte ervan. Hoe beter het beroep scoort in vergelijking met anderen, hoe groter en groener de Sneeuwvlok wordt.
BAANSCORE
6,5/10
Wat is dit?
Functiebeoordeling (hoe hoger, hoe beter):

We beoordelen banen op basis van vier factoren. Deze zijn:

- Kans op automatisering
- Banengroei
- Salarissen
- Aantal beschikbare posities

Dit zijn enkele belangrijke zaken om over na te denken bij het zoeken naar een baan.

Mensen bekeken ook

Computerprogrammeurs Advocaten Webontwikkelaars Acteurs Elektrotechnisch Ingenieurs

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

28% (Laag Risico)

Lage Risico (21-40%): Banen op dit niveau hebben een beperkt risico op automatisering, omdat ze een mix van technische en mensgerichte vaardigheden vereisen.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

Gebruikerspeiling

30% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 28% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Wiskundigen binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?

Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt weergegeven waar er voldoende stemmen zijn om betekenisvolle gegevens te produceren. Het toont de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en biedt een duidelijk beeld van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Matige groei ten opzichte van andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Mathematicians' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 3,7% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2023 en 2033
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2025.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Mathematicians' $ 116.440, of $ 56 per uur

'Mathematicians' werden 142,3% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Aanzienlijk lager bereik van werkgelegenheid vergeleken met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 2.220 mensen in dienst als 'Mathematicians' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer < 0,001% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 68 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Mathematicians'.

Functieomschrijving

Voer onderzoek uit in fundamentele wiskunde of in de toepassing van wiskundige technieken op wetenschap, management en andere velden. Los problemen op in verschillende velden met behulp van wiskundige methoden.

SOC Code: 15-2021.00

Opmerkingen (25)

Laat een reactie achter
singe rapide (Matig)
08 apr. 2025 21:25
AI is getting better by the day at solving problems it hasn't seen before. But proving mathematical theorems isn't just about formal manipulation, mathematicians rely on their senses, physical experience, intuition etc. I think AI will bypass these creative difficulties to produce interesting math eventually, but it will take a while.
FERNANDO  GARCIA CORTES (Onzeker)
09 dec. 2024 16:21
I suppose it will depend on how able the IA is to reply to the process of thinking a mathematician has when he/she makes a demonstration.
1 (Laag)
28 nov. 2024 23:06
Because is hard and needs creativity but also computers can use programs
Guest
29 jul. 2024 08:08
Aaaand Google DeepMind invented AI (AlphaGeometry 2 and AlphaProof) that solves IMO on silver medal. That escalated quickly...
Kevin Gonzalez Gordillo
07 jul. 2024 02:05
Lately, I have been studying Gödel's Incompleteness theorems, and I was thinking, could an AI, or even an AGI, discover that in a consistent system of arithmetic, there are true statements that cannot be proven (incomplete system)? I mean the level of self-awareness and nuance that it would take to discover such a theorem and prove it true would be astounding since not even the best mathematicians of Gödel's times were convinced that was the case. So at this level of logic, I would really doubt an AI would take the jobs of people responsible for opening the heart of mathematics and showing the gaping hole of its fundamental flaw; for any mathematician reading this: Let's keep proving the true, the false, and the unprovable truths, and let's "embrace the unknown at the heart of any quest for truth" -(TED-Ed).
papo (Geen kans)
14 jun. 2024 01:03
Mathematics is a science that is still in discovery, AI will not be able to understand this context
skyss0fly (Matig)
27 apr. 2024 03:59
Robots have to utilise logic in their programming using arithmetic skills and therefore use mathematics to perform tasks and as such can compute mathematical tasks quite easily
Chickenlover69 (Geen kans)
05 jul. 2024 08:40
Being a mathematician is researching math itself, like science. It needs creativity and human intelligence. For example, I certainly don't think AI can discover or invent complex numbers such as i, i = sqrt(-1). But I think you misunderstood the job of a mathematician as you probably thought that they just solve regular math questions that we already know how to solve, no it's not. Math is part of science and will always will be. Science will never be able to be taken over by AI. Remember that.
Anonymous (Onzeker)
11 dec. 2023 05:40
Logic can be programmed, so they may be able to eventually prove theorems
Europe2048 (Matig)
15 sep. 2023 12:57
Maybe WolframAlpha is taking over?
Me (Geen kans)
24 aug. 2023 06:50
Mathematical insights rely on human originality.
Anish (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
08 jul. 2023 02:47
It will simply outclass us in every field.
Probabilist
23 mei 2023 17:39
Mathematicians generally find new ideas to solve problems, they also find new questions, whereas AI is just able to copy what already exists and to adapt it to classical situations. But maybe mathematicians will be able to create themself a new AI which will be able to replace them !!
Andre (Zeer waarschijnlijk)
17 mrt. 2023 23:39
People saying this is unlikely are silly. The progress in the field of computer generated proofs has been faster than the progress in AI art. I don't expect any of the Millennium Prize problems to be solved by humans, and I expect them all solved by 2030.
Jason
10 jul. 2024 03:50
I find it equally silly when you say that none of the Millennium Prize problems will be solved by Humans and all of them will be solved by 2030 (I consider myself an amateur mathematician at best, but from what I understand, the Poincare conjecture has been solved, and the solver, Grigori Perelman I think he's human?) I've hanged out in some mathematics communities and from what I've seen ai has proved some competitive math questions, I guess the four color theorem requires computer assistance, and I've seen Terrence Tao say that Ai could be used to help give Ideas to mathematicians? I've tried searching up ai replacing mathematicians and i only get results of lean which from what i know really only checks if a theorem is right or not. Overall I find the statement that Ai will complete all of the Millennium problems by 2030 to be ridiculous Ai does not seem to be anywhere close to proving some of the most fundamental century old problems in essentially 6 years
Carlos (Geen kans)
11 jun. 2022 21:36
I believe that even general AI will require a lot of time to reach a level where it can be compared on a full basis to a human in regards to maths.
Saurabh Sarkar (Geen kans)
06 nov. 2021 12:11
AI was created from Math. Its development is dependent on the development of new Math. It will be next to impossible for AI to develop new functional math.
James (Onzeker)
28 mei 2021 08:49
Because, AI and supercomputer can overtake the common knowledge
Jo
21 apr. 2021 10:09
If you've ever done college level math and the number of ways you've been told to "Do it by inspection" and the unconventional method that every solution takes, Math is very unlikely to become automated.
AK (Geen kans)
29 mrt. 2021 13:18
Mathematics can go so far, there are literally so infinite possibilities. That may sound extreme but there are so many number systems out there that mathematicians are uncovering everyday as a team and they still can not find all of them. A computer may be faster but since there are so many possibilities both mathematicians and computers must work TOGETHER.
Alex (Laag)
15 dec. 2020 14:32
Mathematics requires quite a bit of creativity, which AI is not capable of.
Faisal Ali Al-Zharani
20 apr. 2020 16:46
Mathematicians being replaced by AI technology is not a bad idea. But this still upsets some people. Like me yes I'm a little upset but I don't I'll be thinking about creating jobs for mathematicians that hasn't bee in the (mathematics society) something like a direct career path for full time mathematicians. If is that secondary school teaching alright but not other job opportunities provided for mathematicians. I'm still thinking about the medicine field & how are experts in the field medicine are going to be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) & also occupations like engineers or scientists.
Mon
23 aug. 2022 20:37
Which career is most persistent to be replaced by AI according to you?
Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep
0/8000