Architecten, Behalve Landschaps- en Scheepsarchitecten

Minimaal Risico
17%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
0,0%
(Minimaal Risico)
PEILING
35%
(Laag Risico)
Average: 17%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
7,8%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 93.310
of $ 44,86 per uur
Volume
111.170
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
8,0/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

0,0% (Minimaal Risico)

Minimaal Risico (0-20%): Beroepen in deze categorie hebben een lage kans op automatisering, omdat ze doorgaans complexe probleemoplossing, creativiteit, sterke interpersoonlijke vaardigheden en een hoge mate van handvaardigheid vereisen. Deze banen omvatten vaak ingewikkelde handbewegingen en precieze coördinatie, waardoor het moeilijk is voor machines om de vereiste taken te repliceren.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele zeer belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Sociale Waarneming

  • Schone Kunsten

  • Onderhandeling

  • Overtuiging

Gebruikerspeiling

35% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 0,0% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Architecten, Behalve Landschaps- en Scheepsarchitecten binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Zeer snelle groei in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 7,8% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' $ 93.310, of $ 44 per uur

'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' werden 94,2% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Groter bereik van werkgelegenheidskansen in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 111.170 mensen in dienst als 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer 0,07% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 1 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Architects, Except Landscape and Naval'.

Functieomschrijving

Plan en ontwerp structuren, zoals privéwoningen, kantoorgebouwen, theaters, fabrieken en andere structurele eigendommen.

SOC Code: 17-1011.00

Middelen

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Sawyer (Laag) 2 months ago
It needs to pour your soul into it to really make a breakthrough. Robots don't have souls
0 0 Reply
Mark (Geen kans) 5 months ago
There is no possible way for AI to take over architecture. To start, a computer cannot hold legal liability. AI doesn’t create; it only copies and reproduces. On a regular basis, my job requires unique solutions and details that cannot be pulled from other sources.

We need to take too many unrelated factors into account for any particular design, versus the cost and time it would take for an AI to be developed to take the job. It would never be profitable for the AI developer. Besides, they wouldn't want the liability risk we have for a mistake that can cost lives.
0 0 Reply
Ben Bailey (Onzeker) 9 months ago
I would love to have AI assist in automating the aspects of Architecture that are tedious, like making sure everything is up to code or automatically adjusting things after moving something else, but I fear that people will become lazy and let AI do the job for them.
0 0 Reply
Aleksandra (Matig) 1 year ago
Projects' created by humans will be for the 1% of richest people who will have a fantasy and need to show off that their projects was done the "expensive way" by a human and not 80/20 rule by AI. What people don't understand is that atm 80% of society is more faulty than AI. Working with AI is a bliss comparing to working with a majority of employees as well as moody specialists on the market is simply a bliss. And we're only starting here...
0 0 Reply
Mark (Onzeker) 1 year ago
Until recently (through March and April 2023), and after having seen the work that Dall-e 2 had produced, I thought it incredibly likely. The argument that architects would still be required seemed to hinge on "you need to interface with a human to get a building built", but I don't think that's true (if a client could save tens of thousands of dollars by inputting their requests on a keyboard, rather than talking to a person, they'd opt for the latter). However, the one aspect of the job that's overlooked is LIABILITY. Currently architects are legally liable for the work they produce, and any failings over that work. AI offers no LIABILITY -- and I highly doubt the software design companies who are producing that AI are willing to accept liability -- and until someone, or a team of someones, is willing to accept that legal responsibility, AI shouldn't be able to threaten that job. However, I said "could go either way" because it's highly possible that people are so stupid, that they would sign a contract that frees the AI architect of liability if it meant they could save a few dollars on fees.
0 0 Reply
phamiliar 9 months ago
It is likely that AI could be the architectural designer and code checker while a civil engineer is responsible for the life and safety of the overall design. I think the job won't necessarily go away its just that there will be many production staff jobs that will be eliminated.
0 0 Reply
Yoshimata R 1 year ago
This will not be popular, but our firm already uses AI: clients type in or speak their ideas and examples The programs we use come up with a myriad of solutions that the clients themselves can then configure and reconfigure at will with all structural processes, including loadbearing etc. built-in throughout the process. 16 of the 38 people at our firm have been laid off since this started.
0 0 Reply
HMS (Geen kans) 1 year ago
Architects are a lot like an artist. AI cannot create cannot something that requires human originality. No two architects are the same, just as two pieces of art are not the same. Architecture requires you to put creativity, originality, emotion, and the social aspect into your work.
0 0 Reply
Architect Downow 1 year ago
Architectural and Interior Design are both iterative processes.
AI will improve this process, detail all the structural draws, and create layouts and floorplans more efficiently than ever.

With solar, water, food and waste visions that now only a few architects embrace in projects.
Leed will be integrated in AI and civil engineering as well.

I guess in the future, anyone can design a house with the help of AI.

Architects, Lawyers and Doctors, the tríade of "good money" will fall.
And me and my boys are working to achieve this as soon as possible.

0 0 Reply
sama 1 year ago
An architect is more than a concept or a few words. It's about thinking, conceptualizing, and making it a reality.
0 0 Reply
:))) (Matig) 2 years ago
Currently, as a student at one of the top architecture schools, I can observe how the most successful students utilize AI. It's clear to see how it improves their workflow and design progress, even as early as 2022.

Already, AI can handle most of the work for an architect. I believe that the next 20 years will further popularize AI within the profession, reducing the amount of work done manually.
0 0 Reply
king rocker (Zeer waarschijnlijk) 2 years ago
LOL it's already dead. Almost no one hires architects now, there are so many tools that already do their job. Wake up, it's game over for this one. The site is way behind the times.
0 0 Reply
Sameer 9 months ago
AI isn’t that capable to satisfy the client with the structure design… however it could help to make the work easy but it can’t overtake the profession.
1 0 Reply
I'dRatherNotInputAName 1 year ago
"LOL it's already dead."
Source? Or did it come to you in a dream?
0 0 Reply
Sebastian from Argentina (Laag) 5 years ago
Creativity from architects mind couldn't be replaced by AI, But some typical architecture room plans, could be systematized by machine learning on cad programs, like actual libraries of equipment, it could be library of rooms, baths, etc.
0 0 Reply
J (Onzeker) 5 years ago
Depends on the kind of architecture, the way that the industry itself thinks about what architecture means (an engineering/optimization problem versus art, desire to rapidly customize vs work on the process with other humans) and what clients demand.
0 0 Reply
pgm777 5 years ago
computerisation will help and not hinder the architectural profession. Automisation is something that has no place
0 0 Reply
Lilly (Laag) 5 years ago
I think it would be quite hard for robots to take clients ideas for architecture and turn it into a floorplan since there are billions of ways to build a house.
0 0 Reply
David J Gill 5 years ago
More effective design software will raise productivity and reduce the number of staff required to complete project documents.
0 0 Reply
Marta 1 year ago
I totally agree. Students and young professionals may have problem with finding a job. Nowadays, they usually do repetitive CAD drawings/models (the main concept was designed by e.g. senior architect), and it all can be automated, especially with BIM
0 0 Reply
Dean B 5 years ago
This is an art form that’s practical so I don’t see it going
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.