Lucht- en Ruimtevaartingenieurs

Laag Risico
34%
Waar Wilt U Hierna Heen Gaan?
Deel je resultaten met vrienden en familie.
Of, verken dit beroep in meer detail...
RISICO VAN AUTOMATISERING
BEREKEND
39%
(Laag Risico)
PEILING
29%
(Laag Risico)
Average: 34%
VRAAG NAAR ARBEID
GROEI
6,0%
tegen het jaar 2033
LONEN
$ 130.720
of $ 62,84 per uur
Volume
66.660
vanaf 2023
SAMENVATTING
BAANSCORE
7,5/10

Mensen bekeken ook

Berekend automatiseringsrisico

39% (Laag Risico)

Lage Risico (21-40%): Banen op dit niveau hebben een beperkt risico op automatisering, omdat ze een mix van technische en mensgerichte vaardigheden vereisen.

Meer informatie over wat deze score is en hoe deze wordt berekend, is beschikbaar hier.

Enkele vrij belangrijke kwaliteiten van de baan zijn moeilijk te automatiseren:

  • Originaliteit

  • Overtuiging

  • Onderhandeling

  • Sociale Waarneming

Gebruikerspeiling

29% kans op volledige automatisering binnen de komende twee decennia

Onze bezoekers hebben gestemd dat er een kleine kans is dat dit beroep zal worden geautomatiseerd. Deze beoordeling wordt verder ondersteund door het berekende automatiseringsrisiconiveau, dat een schatting geeft van 39% kans op automatisering.

Wat denk je dat het risico van automatisering is?

Wat is de kans dat Lucht- en Ruimtevaartingenieurs binnen de komende 20 jaar vervangen zal worden door robots of kunstmatige intelligentie?






Gevoel

De volgende grafiek wordt opgenomen waar er een aanzienlijke hoeveelheid stemmen is om zinvolle gegevens weer te geven. Deze visuele weergaven tonen de resultaten van gebruikerspeilingen in de loop van de tijd en bieden een belangrijke indicatie van sentimenttrends.

Gevoel over tijd (jaarlijks)

Groei

Snelle groei vergeleken met andere beroepen

Het aantal 'Aerospace Engineers' vacatures zal naar verwachting stijgen met 6,0% tegen 2033

Totale werkgelegenheid en geschatte vacatures

* Gegevens van het Bureau of Labor Statistics voor de periode tussen 2021 en 2031
Bijgewerkte prognoses zijn verschuldigd 09-2024.

Lonen

Zeer hoog betaald vergeleken met andere beroepen

In 2023 was het mediane jaarloon voor 'Aerospace Engineers' $ 130.720, of $ 62 per uur

'Aerospace Engineers' werden 172,0% hoger betaald dan het nationale mediane loon, dat op $ 48.060 stond.

Lonen in de loop van de tijd

* Gegevens van het Bureau voor Arbeidsstatistieken

Volume

Matige reeks van werkmogelijkheden in vergelijking met andere beroepen

Vanaf 2023 waren er 66.660 mensen in dienst als 'Aerospace Engineers' binnen de Verenigde Staten.

Dit vertegenwoordigt ongeveer < 0,001% van de werkende bevolking in het hele land.

Anders gezegd, ongeveer 1 op de 2 duizend mensen is werkzaam als 'Aerospace Engineers'.

Functieomschrijving

Voer technische taken uit bij het ontwerpen, bouwen en testen van vliegtuigen, raketten en ruimtevaartuigen. Mogelijk basaal en toegepast onderzoek uitvoeren om de aanpasbaarheid van materialen en apparatuur aan vliegtuigontwerp en -productie te evalueren. Mogelijk verbeteringen aanbevelen in testapparatuur en -technieken.

SOC Code: 17-2011.00

Middelen

Als u overweegt een nieuwe carrière te beginnen, of van baan wilt veranderen, hebben we een handige zoektool voor banen gemaakt die u mogelijk helpt bij het vinden van die perfecte nieuwe functie.

Zoek naar banen in uw lokale omgeving

Opmerkingen

Leave a comment

Felipe Duarte Padilha (Geen kans) 5 months ago
Airplanes or general aircraft are extremely complicated machinery that would need AI inside of the craft to be engineered. It is also extremely costly and would most likely not be able for it to be replaced.
0 0 Reply
Nirmal Teja (Geen kans) 8 months ago
It's almost impossible to any type of artificial intelligence to think out of the box as a human thoughts go there is no limit to human creativity but the artificial intelligence is limited even after decades..
0 0 Reply
James (Geen kans) 1 year ago
Needs innovation and creativity
0 0 Reply
Aero (Laag) 1 year ago
Required novel application of physics
0 0 Reply
L.M. (Geen kans) 1 year ago
the risk of even a slight failure could prevent an ai that could replace this job from ever leaving development
0 0 Reply
duck (Onzeker) 1 year ago
Engineering is a difficult job and with the precision of present machines, they could make things more accurate than human hands. The only downside is a machine/robot can't make full decisions, Humans are able to go through options and choose the best one based on circumstance. Robots can't do that... yet
0 0 Reply
Bagle 6 months ago
pls don't tel me me future profssion will b replaced by AI
0 0 Reply
Kauã (Geen kans) 1 year ago
No way people trust building ROCKETS to A.I.S
0 0 Reply
Sawle (Onzeker) 1 year ago
It really depends on how we see it, if we as engineers use AI to our advantage and adapt it's positives we can easily stay in the field, but if we step aside then you know what will happen eventually.
World now is not waiting for us to improve it WILL improve.
0 0 Reply
BibirMengkeroet (Laag) 2 years ago
Applying for a position as an Aerospace Engineer is already challenging. It's also a job where, if something goes wrong even in the slightest, the financial losses could be enormous.

Take a look at the 2013 Proton rocket crash. It occurred because the engineer installed the rotation sensors upside down, causing it to plummet to the ground. Such a small mistake resulted in $65 million dollars in losses.

However, it could be possible that AI will create more efficient propulsion designs in the future.
0 0 Reply
A (Matig) 2 years ago
Because we could use robots to design and build the aircraft and do the calculations for us.
0 0 Reply
Rick 1 year ago
Robots currently lack the creative ability and proccessing power to do complex designing, so as of the near future its not likely it will be taken over.
0 0 Reply
Saltine (Onzeker) 2 years ago
Some aspects like assembly could be covered by robots but idk if the design and testing process can
0 0 Reply
Bret (Laag) 3 years ago
It's a complex job. Many constraints need to be accounted for. A computer just may not be as good at it.
0 0 Reply
N (Small Chance) 3 years ago
I personally do not believe that rocket scientists/aerospace engineers will be overthrown by AI/robots because it requires complex math, complex designing, and building. I do understand that AI will improve over the years, but I don't see robots doing a job like this. Though I do see them helping around. This scares me as they could probably move up a position.
0 0 Reply
G (Geen kans) 3 years ago
This job designs vehicles that are specifically made for aeronautical and astronautical transportation. It is a highly creative job that requires thinking outside the box.
0 0 Reply
Nicolas (Geen kans) 3 years ago
aerospace engineering is an area that needs innovation and creativity, always discovering new things and not always doing the same task, testing new materials and things that have never been used are constant tasks, etc.
0 0 Reply
Apoorva 3 years ago
As it is a very risk taking job, the one working in this sector has to have a clear mindset of what is right and what is wrong. Whereas robots take decisions according to the way they are programmed. Adding to this, robots are machines so even if they can impress yet they cannot express. Flying or operating a spacecraft or a missile or a rover needs some emotional attachments with hard work, dedication and dreams. Just completing a task within a short span of time won't give happiness 🙂
0 0 Reply
katie 3 years ago
Clever minds. Aerospace engineers need to come up with clever solutions, which robots cannot (at least with today foreseen technology). Think about all different trade studies which were sometimes counter intuitive and required completely surprising and innovative solutions. This would drive robots crazy, right?

Teamwork. Aerospace engineers are required to help each other during product creations, which robots can not do properly. Either you guided someone younger, or you gave a hand on CAD or FEA software tips to a bloke close to retirement. Most of the time you did not care if this person is different skin colour, religion, gender or beliefs. Well this pays off in the end.

No tight space requirement. Unless you are working in a design or manufacturing sweat shop, aerospace engineers do not require squeezing into small spaces which is strong point of robotics.

Negotiation. Aerospace design requires negotiation skills, robots cannot do this properly. Think about all interface and supplier and customer meetings you have ever been to. Or even meetings with different functions like manufacturing and maybe stress analysis.
1 0 Reply
Cody T. (Laag) 4 years ago
I just don't think it is realistic to replace this job within the next 20 years. It seems it take at least a little longer, as this job requires extremely difficult math, and hands on experience engineering. It also requires the capable human mind. Therefore it is unlikely that this job is replaced soon.
0 0 Reply
Julien 4 years ago
The occupation will not be replaced any time soon because it requires critical and creative thinking, which AI or robots do not possess currently.
0 0 Reply
Julien (Laag) 4 years ago
Aerospace Engineers will not be replaced any time soon because robots and AI are not technologically advanced yet.
0 0 Reply

Laat een reactie achter over dit beroep

Deze site wordt beschermd door reCAPTCHA en het Privacybeleid en de Servicevoorwaarden van Google zijn van toepassing.